Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-13-07, 10:37 AM   #1
joe_5700
CAT4
Thread Starter
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Trek 7100 or 7200?

I recently got back into biking. I haven't ridden since I was in my teens, and I am now 34. To make sure I didn't waste money on something I wouldn't stick to, I bought a cheapo Schwinn Ranger mountain bike at Target. After riding for a few months, I know I want a more serious bike. The Schwinn is just not a good bike. It makes me nervous at higher speeds, and the gears are terrible. I think a hybrid bike would best suit my recreational riding. I have narrowed my choices down to a Trek 7100 or 7200. Can anyone tell me if the 7200 is worth the extra money?

thanks,

Joe
joe_5700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 10:45 AM   #2
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,666
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 497 Post(s)
What are the differences?
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 11:01 AM   #3
joe_5700
CAT4
Thread Starter
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker
What are the differences?

From a price standpoint, the 7200 is about $90 more. It looks like the 7200 has 3 more gears and upgraded rims and tires. The differences in equipment are:

7100:
Shifters: SRAM 3.0 Comp 7 speed
Rear Dearailleur: SRAM ESP 3.0
Crank: SR NEX-208
Cassette: Sunrace 13-34 7 speed
Wheels: Matrix 550 alloy rims
Tires: Bontrager invert 700x35

7200:
Shifters: SRAM 3.0 Comp 8 speed
Rear Dearailleur: Shimano Alivio
Crank: Shimano TX71
Cassette: SRAM PG830 8 speed
Wheels: Matrix 750
Tires: Bontrager invert puncture resistant 700x35
joe_5700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 11:23 AM   #4
Gingergin
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Bikes: Trek 7200FX
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi Joe. Though I don't know anything about the technical differences between the 2, I can tell you that I am happy with my 7200. I bought it last year as an out-of-shape-not-been-on-a-bike-in-forever 44 year old woman and have never had any problem. OK,so I'm only about 45 miles a week on a paved trail, and not a speed demon, but it has made me feel safe and sturdy, very easy to get used to and I've never had gear-changing problems even though I'm always messing around with them. I switched my seat out once but just put the Bontrager back on, and the only thing I added was mini toy clips.
Gingergin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 01:39 PM   #5
bkaapcke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Before you buy, look at the 7300's too. Same frame, better stuff. bk
bkaapcke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 01:39 PM   #6
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,666
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 497 Post(s)
I don't know if the more expensive shifters on the 7200 are a little smoother or more reliable than on the 7100, and someone who knows shifters better than me will have to answer.

However: the cassette on the 7200 is 11-32, and the one on 7100 it is 13-34. That means the cheaper bike is geared a bit lower (better for steep hills) and the more expensive bike has a higher top speed, but not as low a lowest gear. If you really have a struggle getting up some of the hills around you, the 7100 has a better gear range for you.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 01:57 PM   #7
CTAC
Senior Member
 
CTAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkaapcke
Before you buy, look at the 7300's too. Same frame, better stuff. bk
Or 7.3 FX. Very nice bike.
CTAC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 02:16 PM   #8
joe_5700
CAT4
Thread Starter
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thank you for your replies. The 7300 is a little more than what I want to spend. Right now I am mostly riding around my suburb neighborhood in Omaha Nebraska which has hills a-plenty. I may want the longer gears of the 7200. I know with my Schwinn on flat roads I am able to pedal as fast as I can in it's final gear (21), when a higher gear would increase my speed. When I first started riding again I found myself hunting for lower gears on hills. Now I blast into them sometimes in final gear standing on the pedals. I found out that the front suspension can work against you so I slightly sway the bike side to side to avoid this. After my rides my hands get a little sore even though I play the drums. I was considering the 7000 (solid fork) for that reason before I found the work around.
joe_5700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 09:59 PM   #9
bkaapcke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 3,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
One of my ride buddies has a 7200 and is really happy with it. It has been very reliable for him. I've worked on it for him (adjusted rear der) and , for the money, I was impressed. bk
bkaapcke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 11:07 PM   #10
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,371
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
I'd vote for the 7200.
The large cog on it is 32 teeth, so it's not quite as law as the 34 tooth on the 7100. Most likely, that is good! Either one would let you climb a wall if you could get traction.
I think the componant upgrade is worth the money.
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-07, 11:22 PM   #11
Groundhawg
Senior Member
 
Groundhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
IMO either bike is good. I purchased a trek 7100 in August of 2004. The bike has been trouble free. The bike is comfortable and pretty fast. I do have flat bars on my bike so the riding position isn't as upright as other 7100's.

I've had one flat on the bike in 4 years. After having the flat, I purchased some "Specialized Armadillo tires" and put on it. So far, no more flats.

You can't go wrong with either bike. Good luck

One other thing. I live in a flat rural area. If your going to do a lot of shifting the 7200 maybe a better choice. I don't know for sure though. The reason I picked the 7100 over the 7200 is I wasn't for sure I was going to like cycling. So I took the cheaper route.
Groundhawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-07, 02:06 PM   #12
Patman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Bikes:
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My GF and I got 7100s a bit over a year ago, and they've been great bikes.
Patman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 02:49 PM   #13
joe_5700
CAT4
Thread Starter
 
joe_5700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
Posts: 1,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Well, yesterday I made up my mind and purchased the 7200. I rode both at the LBS and the 7100's gearing was just too short for my tastes. Also the 7200 had smoother shifting, with less "clickity clack". I bought a little cheapo Bell wireless computer at Walmart. It seems to be fairly accurate.

Does anyone know why Trek bikes come so stripped accessory wise? My bike didn't even come with a kickstand. I pulled off the kickstand and water bottle holder off of my Schwinn mountain bike and everything fit perfectly.
joe_5700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 03:41 PM   #14
bbattle
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, 1990 Gardin Shred, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
Posts: 12,557
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_5700
Does anyone know why Trek bikes come so stripped accessory wise? My bike didn't even come with a kickstand. I pulled off the kickstand and water bottle holder off of my Schwinn mountain bike and everything fit perfectly.
Many people don't want a kickstand. It's not just Trek, most bikes sold outside of x-mart do not come with kickstands. They don't come with bottle cages, either. Most road bikes don't come with pedals, too.
bbattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-07, 04:42 PM   #15
Groundhawg
Senior Member
 
Groundhawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_5700
Does anyone know why Trek bikes come so stripped accessory wise? My bike didn't even come with a kickstand. I pulled off the kickstand and water bottle holder off of my Schwinn mountain bike and everything fit perfectly.
Could be the bike shop where you purchased it? My 7100 came with a kickstand and water bottle holder already installed. The water bottle holder is painted the same color as the bike. However, I purchased mine in 2004. Things may be different now.

I remember my son was about to purchase a 7200 the same day I bought the 7100. He decided to buy a mountain bike after riding both. I believe that 7200 already had a water bottle holder on it. I know it had a kickstand because my son accidently broke it and had to pay for it.

He stopped at a stop sign and the bike rolled backwards a little bit breaking the kickstand. It wasn't because the kickstand was weak. It's just that my son is a big guy who also happens to lift weights and is a personal trainer. He tends to be tough on things.

Anyway, congrats on the 7200. I think you will enjoy the bike very much.
Groundhawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-07, 07:15 AM   #16
neoz
Just Rockin'
 
neoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida
Bikes: Trek 7000 xtracycle
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I looked at the 7000, 7100 and 7200 and decided to go with the 7000, just because I wanted rigid forks. The components work well, and I prefer it to my old Bianchi commuter.
neoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.