Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member djbowen1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Cervelo Soliost
    Posts
    2,283
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Determining Crank arm length for Road Bike

    I have a pretty average body type, 130 lbs, 5'9''. I am going to upgrade my Cannondale R600 from Cannondale cranks to Ultegra while the shimano stuff is so inexpensive. I dont know what crank arm lenght i have and dont know what to but. I am guessing a 175mm?

  2. #2
    Mad For Marinoni !!! Captain Crunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Matheson, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    438
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Figuring out what you have is the easy part. You just measure from the centre of the pedal spindle hole to the center of the crank bolt and that will give you the measurement in (mm). Many cranks also have the length marked on the inside of the crank arm so look for this first.

    The hard part is figuring out what you need or want. This is usually done through the painstaking process of trial and error. Shorter cranks are easier on the knees and are easier to spin or keep a higher cadence. Some people like the longer cranks as they get more leverage especially when climbing. It is really a matter of personal taste. I used to use 175's but switched to 170's and just love them as do my knees. It has not slowed me down at all and in fact the hills are much easier as my cadence has stayed up significantly since the switch.

    Good luck.
    One does not cease to play because one grows old.
    One grows old because one ceases to play.

  3. #3
    A Heart Needs a Home Rich Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've gradually reduced my crank lengths over the years as well, and now use 170's on all my bikes. This does seem to have helped my knees, and I do tend to spin up hills without standing a lot more than I used to. All of this being part of the adjustments we make to the way bodies can change as they age.

    I would be surprised if an R600 that's the right size for a 5'9" rider -- probably a 55? -- came with 175's. Probably 172.5's or even 170's.

    I'd probably recommend going with the same crank length if you've been happy with it, and changing to something else if you haven't. Wow, that took years of study and experience to figure out, didn't it?


    RichC
    Training: 2002 Fuji Roubaix Pro (105 triple)
    Commuting/Daytripping: 2001 Airborne Carpe Diem (Ultegra/XTR, touring wheels)
    Commuting/Touring: 2000 Novara Randonee (Sora/Tiagra/LX, fenders, lights)

  4. #4
    On Your Right ZackJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Warner Robins, GA
    Posts
    1,422
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    djbowen1: Most crankarm lengths are indicated on the back of the crankarm. Look on the inside of the arm just above where the pedal bolts on. You should see something 170, 172.5 or 175.

    I recently switched from 175's to 170's and really like the shorter cranks.

    Zack
    "You never fail, you simply produce results. Learn from these" - Anonymous

  5. #5
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,920
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'8" tall, wear a 30" trouser inseam, ride a 55cm C-T road frame, and have almost always used 170mm cranks, which should be about right for you, as well. I put 165s on my UO-8 to reduce the pedal / front tyre interference resulting from its fork, which has a shorter-than-stock rake.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  6. #6
    feros ferio John E's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Location
    www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
    My Bikes
    1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
    Posts
    14,920
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Zack -- Since my mother died of MS, please count me in for a $75 pledge.
    "Early to bed, early to rise. Work like hell, and advertise." -- George Stahlman
    Capo [dschaw'-poe]: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
    Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
    Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
    Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069

  7. #7
    bac
    bac is offline
    Senior Member bac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    My Bikes
    Too many to list!
    Posts
    7,487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why would shorter cranks be easier on the knees? Wouldn't it increase the load on the knees as the mechanical advantage would lessen?

    Anywho, for what it's worth, I'm 5' 8" with long legs relative to my body. Both my mountain bike and road bike have 175mm crank arms. For some reason, the cranks on my road bike seem larger, but they are indeed the same as my mountain bike.

    Perhaps I should bump down to 172.5 or 170 to see how it feels????

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,269
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Crank length is part of the gearing equation. Applying the same force on a longer crank generates more torque, so you can turn a higher gear. BUT you will take longer to spin the crank through its larger radius. Under the same riding conditions, a rider would normally chose to ride in a different cog-ratio when using different sized cranks. Whatever way you do it, you have to apply the same amount of work to get the same speed, its a matter of pedalling force vs cadence.

    You should chose cranks to fit the size of your legs, or more probably your femur. At 5'9" you are just below average male hight, so should probably use a 170. The common range of sizes gos from 160 to 175, but cranks are available from about 150 to 185mm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •