Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-19-07, 03:45 PM   #1
hatshepsut
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
700 vs. 27 why the switch?

ok, the roadie section has no interest in this...

Man, I can't believe I want through all that registration for one silly question, but this has been bothering me. Does anyone know why road bikes switched from 27" to 700c? Anyone that works as a mechanic long enough accidentally grabs a 27 and when installation is attempted one finds that it is significantly larger than a 700c.
With all this hoopla about 29ers and bigger being better, why not the 27? Was it due to the quicker acceleration of the smaller wheel? Some kind of industry induced standard? The rest of the world snubbing the U.S. for its rejection of the metric system?
hatshepsut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 04:05 PM   #2
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I don't think it's a silly question, but I doubt there's really a simple, clearcut answer. I think hook edged clincher rims probably had a lot to do with it. True racing bikes always used 700c, in the form of tubulars, even in America. And in America, if you weren't running tubulars, you were usually running 27" clinchers on road bikes. In Europe, 700c was common regardless.

Once hook edge rims became common by the early to mid '80's, and the performance gap between tubular and clincher tires was narrowed because clinchers could run at significantly higher pressures than before because of the hook edge design, the 700c size began to show up on clincher wheels in America. There was a certain racy stylishness in running 700c's, even if you weren't running tubulars. That's my theory, anyway.

The tire and rim manufacturers were probably behind it because it made things simpler for them. I don't think the reasoning had anything to do with any performance difference, one way or the other, based on the 8mm difference in diameter.

Last edited by well biked; 11-19-07 at 04:12 PM.
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 04:27 PM   #3
alanbikehouston
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This question gets asked a lot in the "Vintage" forum. "Well Biked" has answered the question about as well as anyone.

There are still lots of "27" inch wheels around...I have two or three bikes that use them. If you are riding through most tiny villages in America, a hardware store is likely to have a few "27" inch tires on the wall, and so will the local K-Mart. And, outside of a "real" bike shop, finding a 700c tire can be impossible.

So, if I lived in "North Moose, South Dakota", I'd be hanging on to my 27 inch wheels for a bit longer.
alanbikehouston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 04:40 PM   #4
edp773
Senior Member
 
edp773's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinios
Bikes: 2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
Posts: 1,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do you think it is because the rest of the world uses the metric system and and bicycle componets are made overseas?
edp773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 05:03 PM   #5
cyccommute 
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Bikes: Some silver ones, a black one, a red one, an orange one and a couple of titanium ones
Posts: 17,849
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by edp773 View Post
Do you think it is because the rest of the world uses the metric system and and bicycle componets are made overseas?
This is probably the best answer. If you only have one market in the world that uses a goofy measurement, why make tires to fit their arcane measurement system? Especially when they don't buy that many bikes, per capita, to begin with.

Mountain bike, on the other hand, started under our goofy measurement system and spread to the rest of the world. And we bought more of them in the early years than the rest of the world so they stuck with that measurement system.
__________________
Stuart Black
New! Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
New! Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Days of Wineless Roads. Bed and Breakfasting along the KATY
Twisting Down the Alley. Misadventures in tornado alley.
An Good Ol' Fashion Appalachian Butt Whoopin'.
cyccommute is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 05:41 PM   #6
wahoonc
Senior Member
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Posts: 16,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree with the other posters. I suspect it also may have been fueled by the fact that there are/were more bikes per capita in the Europe (read metric) than in the US especially in the 700c size. As far as the 29'ers are concerned, IMHO it is nothing but marketing hype.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 06:03 PM   #7
deraltekluge
Senior Member
 
deraltekluge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
Posts: 1,195
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Think about automobile tires...the common sizing system today is to give the tire width in millimeters, and the wheel diameter in inches. Are bicycle tire sizes any weirder?
deraltekluge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-07, 06:23 PM   #8
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,543
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyccommute View Post
This is probably the best answer. If you only have one market in the world that uses a goofy measurement, why make tires to fit their arcane measurement system? Especially when they don't buy that many bikes, per capita, to begin with.
So what size headsets are they using? How about pedal spindles?
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-07, 08:55 AM   #9
well biked 
biked well
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 7,065
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Here's a link to some of the 1984 Schwinn catalog specs:

http://www.trfindley.com/flschwinn_1...984Ltwt18.html

Scroll down to the rim and tire specs, and you can see that among Schwinn's three "competition" bikes that year, the top-line Peloton came with tubulars, the Super Sport came with high pressure 700 x 25c clinchers, and the Tempo came with high pressure 27's. Each year, the 700c clinchers "trickled down" further and further into the line. I don't think it was necessarily metric vs. English, just more of a performance-image kind of thing. The hook edged high pressure 700c's, presta valves, etc. were emulating the racing tubulars. As often happens, the trickle down effect eventually meant pretty much all road bikes made the switch, and 27's were phased out.

Last edited by well biked; 11-20-07 at 10:57 AM.
well biked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-07, 09:44 AM   #10
hotbike
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike
Posts: 2,851
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I don't see too many 26x1 3/8ths tires or rims anymore.
Anyone using 26x1 3/8ths?
They are not compatible with 26x2.125, as the 26 inch measurement is the *outside* diameter.
hotbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-07, 04:41 PM   #11
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Posts: 8,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotbike View Post
I don't see too many 26x1 3/8ths tires or rims anymore.
Anyone using 26x1 3/8ths?
They are not compatible with 26x2.125, as the 26 inch measurement is the *outside* diameter.
That is the old 590mm rim size that only American bicycle companies used. The newer, MTB derived 26" rim is 559mm, and became the new standard for MTBs, comfort, and cruisers bikes.
DieselDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-07, 10:27 PM   #12
MKahrl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Bikes: Rivendell A.Homer Hilsen, Paramount P13, (4) Falcon bicycles, Mondia Special, Rodriguez Tandem
Posts: 1,028
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
In the 70's even top of the line touring bikes used 27". And they were designed so that you could swap out to 700c just by moving the brake pads down. You could also put either centerpulls or Campy sidepulls on the same bike. It was the invention of the short reach brake that screwed everything up. With the brake bridge and fork crown moved down and clearances around the tire minimized so that only small tires fit; not only was the 27" rim size dead but all notions of decent size tires and/or fenders were no longer thinkable on a road bike.
MKahrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-07, 04:13 PM   #13
Kommisar89
Bottecchia fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Bikes: 1959 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional (in progress...), 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special (in progress...), 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame), 1974 Peugeot UO-8
Posts: 3,425
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoonc View Post
As far as the 29'ers are concerned, IMHO it is nothing but marketing hype.

Aaron
In fact, 700C rims and 29'ers are exactly the same rim bead diameter, 622mm. A wide 700C rim intended for road touring is likely to be the same as a mountain bike 29'er rim.

Much of the confusion today stems from the archaic system of considering the rim and tire to be a single system and using the outside diameter of the tire as the size designation, exactly the opposite of actual current practice where rims sizes are relatively standardized and you buy the size and style of tire by width for your specific purpose. Thus in the old days, a narrow, low-profile tire might have the same outside diameter as a fat high profile tire which means the narrow, low-profile tire would require a larger diameter rim but both might be refered to by the same outside diameter designation even though they were not interchangeable.
__________________
1959 Bottecchia Professional (frame), 1966 Bottecchia Professional, 1971 Bottecchia Professional (frame),
1973 Bottecchia Gran Turismo, 1974 Bottecchia Special, 1977 Bottecchia Special (frame),
1974 Peugeot UO-8, 1988 Panasonic PT-3500, 2002 Bianchi Veloce, 2004 Bianchi Pista
Kommisar89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-07, 05:50 PM   #14
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselDan View Post
That is the old 590mm rim size that only American bicycle companies used.
And Raleigh and all the other English 26" 3 speeds bikes.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-07, 06:16 PM   #15
dr.raleigh
I like bikes
 
dr.raleigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Butler PA
Bikes: Raleigh M20
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think its because most other countries already used the 700c size.
dr.raleigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-08, 10:01 PM   #16
graywolf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Boone NC USA
Bikes: Bianchi hybrid. Dunelt 3-sp. Raleigh basket case. Wanting a Roadster.
Posts: 622
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
And Raleigh and all the other English 26" 3 speeds bikes.
Why am I replying to an ancient thread?

37-590 (1-3/8x26) are a British size. AFAIK no American made bicycle had them. Of course a lot of department store imports had them. Schwinn also had a 1-3/8x26 tire but it fit on a 597mm rim not the 590mm rim of the British. I am aware of this because I just put some cheap new 37-590 tires on my 3-speed. Strangely they are actually only about 30mm in cross-section and just barely fit on the enrich rims, I would think they would be too narrow to use on a westricks (the drop center rim used on Raleigh Sports). However, they were very cheap, and are only intended to be used until I build the alloy rim wheels.

For what it is worth the Brits & Scandinavians used one set of tire sizes, the French and Italians used another, and we Americans used yet a different set of sizes. Everyone making serious tubular tired bikes seemed to use 700 sized tires (I almost said rims, but that is wrong it would be 622 rims) though.

150 years later we are still influenced by terminology from the days of high wheel bicycles where the diameter of the tire controlled how fast you could go.
graywolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 06:31 AM   #17
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,543
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by edp773 View Post
Do you think it is because the rest of the world uses the metric system and and bicycle componets are made overseas?
If that were true then explain the logic of steerer tube and headset sizing.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 12:16 PM   #18
hotbike
Senior Member
 
hotbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Bikes: a lowrider BMX, a mountain bike, a faired recumbent, and a loaded touring bike
Posts: 2,851
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselDan View Post
That is the old 590mm rim size that only American bicycle companies used. The newer, MTB derived 26" rim is 559mm, and became the new standard for MTBs, comfort, and cruisers bikes.
I was going to say something , but I-like-to-bike corrected you.

The 26 by one-and-three-eighths was found on all those three speed "English Racers", as we Americans called them.

Also , My first ten speed was a 1976 Columbia with the 26x1 3/8ths tires.
hotbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 12:20 PM   #19
Tom Stormcrowe
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
 
Tom Stormcrowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Posts: 16,120
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd almost bet that material cost has something to do with it as well. It takes X amount less material to manufacture a rim or a tire 4mm smaller in radius, so for the sales volume, every Y wheel or tire is free from a manufacturing standpoint.
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche

"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
Tom Stormcrowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 01:09 PM   #20
maddyfish
Senior Member
 
maddyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ky. and FL.
Bikes: KHS steel SS
Posts: 3,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think a better question is--- why did we ever use 27" tires? Quality bikes here, and in Europe used 700 tires, why did 27s ever get used in the first place?
maddyfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 02:35 PM   #21
Ex Pres
#39
 
Ex Pres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: the 35223 (AL)
Bikes:
Posts: 6,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddyfish View Post
I think a better question is--- why did we ever use 27" tires? Quality bikes here, and in Europe used 700 tires, why did 27s ever get used in the first place?

Because the English and the French (and the rest of Europe for that matter) don't see eye-to-eye; and out of spite the English adopted 27", and we followed in their footsteps.


(Pure speculation but it sounds logical to me - now someone shoot holes in it with the truth )
Ex Pres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-08, 03:35 PM   #22
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,543
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotbike View Post
I don't see too many 26x1 3/8ths tires or rims anymore.
I disagree. Any number of 26 X 1 3/8 tires or rims is way too many.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-08, 12:57 AM   #23
Wino Ryder
"Purgatory Central"
 
Wino Ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: beautiful "Cypress Gardens" florida
Bikes:
Posts: 1,757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The way I understand it, 27-in wheels started with the american 'bike boom' era in the mid 70's. American consumers were confused by the metric designation 700c and the japanese bike manufacturers, veying to fill the american demand, created the next closest size in American Standard of 27 inch for the adult bikes. This faired well all through the 80's and was even spec'd on some of the high end japanese bikes of the time. Europe on the other hand, was very reluctant to go to 27-in because most of their sales were domestic, and saw no need to change or add 27 inch tooling to the tried and true 700c measure, which they loved and embraced for over 50 years.

European road racers for years and years rode on european bikes with their standard 700c metric designation and were'nt about to change. Because of this 'bullheadedness' of sticking to their guns, and the continuous wins in european racing, it eventually sealed the fate for the 27 inchers, and by the early 90's they were phased out.

but then again, I could be wrong.
Wino Ryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-08, 06:22 AM   #24
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,543
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wino Ryder View Post
American consumers were confused by the metric designation 700c and the japanese bike manufacturers, veying to fill the american demand, created the next closest size in American Standard of 27 inch for the adult bikes. Europe on the other hand, was very reluctant to go to 27-in because most of their sales were domestic, and saw no need to change or add 27 inch tooling to the tried and true 700c measure,
Might be true but doesn't sound logical to me. My first derailleur equipped bike was a Raleigh Grand Prix (67 model maybe?) that had a sticker saying it was made in Worksop England. It had 27" wheels.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-08, 07:55 AM   #25
LWaB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barker View Post
Because the English and the French (and the rest of Europe for that matter) don't see eye-to-eye; and out of spite the English adopted 27", and we followed in their footsteps.


(Pure speculation but it sounds logical to me - now someone shoot holes in it with the truth )
Fairly close. In reality Dunlop developed the 27" wheel size to try to keep other European tyre manufacturers from competing in Britain. It then spread to America and other former colonies, before eventually dying out.
LWaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.