Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-28-07, 07:49 PM   #1
CrimsonEclipse
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Question on crank arm length

I've been looking for a crank arm for a beater bike and while looking
for a replacement I noticed the different lengths. 170mm seems to be
midrange while + or - 10 to 15mm.

To my question, why would I want to go to a longer or shorter length
crank arm. Better torque? Longer (shorter) legs? Use specific? (road -vs-
MTB -vs- commuter)

CE
CrimsonEclipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-07, 07:53 PM   #2
operator
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Posts: 28,306
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Longer crank = shorter seat height. Keep that in mind. Too long cranks = greater knee flex = might hurt unless you are a tall person.

In general (with a gazillion exceptions), the taller you are the longer your cranks.
operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-07, 08:31 PM   #3
biknbrian
Senior Member
 
biknbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: BiknBrian brand custom 26 inch commuter trekker, Cannondale F600 Single Speeded MTB, Nashbar Cro-Mo CX, some other bikes and parts that could be made into bikes.
Posts: 352
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I switch between bikes with 170, 172.5, and 175mm cranks. I can't even tell difference apart from the over all feeling of a completely different style of bike. 5mm is nothing, it's only 1/5 of an inch. If you're tall get 175mm just because, if you're short get 170mm just because, If you can't decide, get 172.5mm, but there's really not much difference in my opinion.
biknbrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-07, 08:56 PM   #4
Rev.Chuck
The Red Lantern
 
Rev.Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh NC
Bikes:
Posts: 5,966
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It depends on your leg length, with variation for the kind of riding you are doing. The longer your leg, the longer the crankarm(And I cannot remember the numbers off hand). However if you need a high cadence you want a shorter arm(smaller circle, lower foot/leg speed) But if you want more oomph you want a longer arm(off road torque) For a putz around bike it does not matter to much.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.

I am in the woods and I have gone crazy.
Rev.Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-07, 09:22 PM   #5
Sci-Fi
Senior Member
 
Sci-Fi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depends on how your knees feel about the crank length. It's different for many people and some prefer longer cranks because they feel they can get more leverage/torque while other prefer spinning/higher cadence with shorter cranks. It's a matter of preference and/or what your body tells you is the right comfort length for your riding style/conditions/distance.
Sci-Fi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-07, 09:47 PM   #6
Bill Kapaun
Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Bikes: 86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
Posts: 9,194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Sometimes 5MM makes a world of difference, as it did for me!

Are Your Cranks Too Long?
Bill Kapaun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-07, 12:12 AM   #7
Mr. Beanz
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem
Posts: 20,030
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have 172.5 and 175 on my bikes. I can't feel a darn difference. If it affected my stroke that much, I think buying a new pair of shoes or shorts might end my cycling career!
Mr. Beanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-07, 12:35 PM   #8
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Bikes:
Posts: 12,920
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you assume that 170mm is normal for an average male 5'10" rider then you can scale the crank length to some proportion of leg length (often femur length) to get a normal crank for any other size rider.
The reasons for departing from "normal" size are several:
You might use a shorter crank if:
You want to spin faster.
Ride a banked track
Your bike lacks sufficient ground clearance.
You want to avoid toe-clip overlap with the front wheel.

You might use a longer than normal cranks for:
slow, hilly off roading.
If you prefer to apply lots of force to the pedals.

Crank length affects the torque at the bottomk bracket but has no effect on the speed (at constant power). Longer cranks rotate through a longer distance so require more work per rev but each rev takes longer.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-07, 12:53 PM   #9
edp773
Senior Member
 
edp773's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinios
Bikes: 2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
Posts: 1,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
If you assume that 170mm is normal for an average male 5'10" rider then you can scale the crank length to some proportion of leg length (often femur length) to get a normal crank for any other size rider.
The reasons for departing from "normal" size are several:
You might use a shorter crank if:
You want to spin faster.
Ride a banked track
Your bike lacks sufficient ground clearance.
You want to avoid toe-clip overlap with the front wheel.

You might use a longer than normal cranks for:
slow, hilly off roading.
If you prefer to apply lots of force to the pedals.

Crank length affects the torque at the bottomk bracket but has no effect on the speed (at constant power). Longer cranks rotate through a longer distance so require more work per rev but each rev takes longer.
A great explanation. I would like to add two things:

You might use a shorter crank if:

You have knee problems
You have ankle flex problems
edp773 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-07, 08:43 PM   #10
Doug5150
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse View Post
To my question, why would I want to go to a longer or shorter length
crank arm. Better torque? Longer (shorter) legs? Use specific? (road -vs- MTB -vs- commuter)
Short version:
longer cranks allow more low-speed torque, but can't be spun as fast and is considerably harder on your knees on long rides.
shorter cranks is the other way around.

You don't see a whole lot of variation among upright bikes, but it's not unusual for people with recumbents to run shorter-than-usual cranks: 150mm cranks won't raise any eyebrows in that crowd. Even fairly-tall people use them.

-----

It would seem to make sense to me that crank length should be somewhat proportional to leg length, but many studies have found not much difference in outputs. Overly-long cranks do tend to cause knee problems, and I wonder how many of these studies used durations long enough to detect that.
~
Doug5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-07, 09:20 AM   #11
markhr
POWERCRANK addict
 
markhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Acton, West London, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 3,783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There'e are multiple schools of thought on this. Shorter cranks = less stress on joints and easier spinning. Longer cranks = more muscle use so larger gears can be used, shorter cranks = better cornering clearance, longer cranks = better for taller riders, shorter cra.....etc.

Everything from homemade 100mm cranks on recumbents to 200mm+ cranks for triathletes

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...e+crank+length

Powercranks and a few other crank companies make adjustable cranks if you really want to spend the time working out what's the optimal length for you.

http://www.google.com/search?num=100...length&spell=1
__________________
shameless POWERCRANK plug
Recommended reading for all cyclists - Cyclecraft - Effective Cycling
Condor Cycles - quite possibly the best bike shop in London
Don't run red lights, wear a helmet, use hand signals, get some cycle lights(front and rear) and, FFS, don't run red lights!

Last edited by markhr; 12-02-07 at 09:26 AM.
markhr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-07, 09:18 AM   #12
Houston
titleless
 
Houston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just read of a study conducted by Leonard Zinn on this exact subject. Supposedly the findings suggested strongly that most people would do better with 165mm cranks. I have 180mm cranks on both of my bikes, road and mountain, and after having reconsidered my purpose in riding I will go to shorter cranks, possibly 170mm.
Houston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-07, 08:28 PM   #13
bbattle
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Trevisio, 1991 Colnago Master, '06 Bianchi San Jose, 1987 Moulton Fuso, 1990 Gardin Shred, '82 John Howard(Dave Tesch)
Posts: 12,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I"m 5'8" and went from 175mm to 170mm cranks on the roadie. I liked the change. I noticed I could spin easier, cadence went up 10-15rpm immediately. My Fixed gear Bianchi has 165mm, as does my mtb. Pedal strike is bad, but pedal strike on a fixed gear bike can be catastrophic.
bbattle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 AM.