Front brake - Flying over the handlebars
#26
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Actually, maximum braking occurs when you spot the sign that says "free beer" with an arrow pointing down a driveway you just passed..... or when your brakes fail and you stop by hitting the side of a building...... and when your parachute doesn't open (but that generally will only ever happen to you once).
Q1): That would be the "Oh*****I'mAboutToDie" force. It's one of the most powerfull forces in the universe. It's so powerfull that survivors often report a slowing down of time and everything happening in slow motion while under its influence.
Q1): That would be the "Oh*****I'mAboutToDie" force. It's one of the most powerfull forces in the universe. It's so powerfull that survivors often report a slowing down of time and everything happening in slow motion while under its influence.
My dear friend, I don't know if your answer is more funny than pathetic or more pathetic than funny.
So... . by the way.. .. what's your point?
#27
Senior Member
There is no "force" pushing the rider over the bars. The only force is the bike pushing backwards due to the deceleration from the friction of the pads on rim and tyre on ground. You can calculate this force indirectly by measuring braking-distance from a given-speed at maximum-deceleration. Plug into these two physics equations to arrive at deceleration-G:
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
Last edited by DannoXYZ; 12-12-07 at 07:37 AM.
#28
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I still believe that it has to be a formula that this force (Angular Momentum I believe) can be calculated taking in consideration the speed, height and weight of the bike, rider's weight and gravity center.
Its like this; A bike with a mass of 15Kg, having a rider with a mass of 80 kg hits a parking concrete barrier at 5 km/h, where hitting the barrier equals with brake force.
In this example, at this speed, chances are the rider will not fly over the handlebar.
Yet in the same equation, if we change the variable "speed" with 15 km/h, chances are the rider will start sailing thru the air.
Now the case scenario, only that the rider would have 120 kg. Most likely the bike wouldn't tip over. (due to rider's mass)
Now if we take this last rider's mass of 120kg but we increase the variable "speed at 40 km/h, chances are the bike will tip over
The question is how do I calculate the force of the impact occurred at 5km/h and at 15 km/h knowing the speed, and the mass of both rider and bike.
Thank you!
Its like this; A bike with a mass of 15Kg, having a rider with a mass of 80 kg hits a parking concrete barrier at 5 km/h, where hitting the barrier equals with brake force.
In this example, at this speed, chances are the rider will not fly over the handlebar.
Yet in the same equation, if we change the variable "speed" with 15 km/h, chances are the rider will start sailing thru the air.
Now the case scenario, only that the rider would have 120 kg. Most likely the bike wouldn't tip over. (due to rider's mass)
Now if we take this last rider's mass of 120kg but we increase the variable "speed at 40 km/h, chances are the bike will tip over
The question is how do I calculate the force of the impact occurred at 5km/h and at 15 km/h knowing the speed, and the mass of both rider and bike.
Thank you!
I realize that winter is upon us, and we are often shut up within our respective laboratories, but seriously, put your slide rule away and go ride your bike. Clearly, you are smart as a whip (whatever that is supposed to mean), and will figure out this mystery before anyone else. Or, are you just looking for an argument to pass the winter solstice, hmm?
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Long Beach, ca
Posts: 952
Bikes: RadRunner Plus, Kona Dew Deluxe
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I went over my bike's bars on braking alone -- the trick is to be going downhill.
My dislocated shoulder took about 10 months to fully recover.
My dislocated shoulder took about 10 months to fully recover.
#30
Sensible shoes.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Paul,MN
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: A few.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I seriously wonder how much saddle time some of you folks have.
Danno, you really should drop by more often. As always, your posts elaborate far better then I ever could.
Danno, you really should drop by more often. As always, your posts elaborate far better then I ever could.
#31
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is no "force" pushing the rider over the bars. The only force is the bike pushing backwards due to the deceleration from the friction of the pads on rim and tyre on ground. You can calculate this force indirectly by measuring braking-distance from a given-speed at maximum-deceleration. Plug into these two physics equations to arrive at deceleration-G:
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
Trying to analyze your theory and calculations I realized that I was looking in the wrong place for answer. Thus in order to come up with the right answer I have to look at the longitudinal stability because we have to consider in the first place mechanical forces generated by the a bike.
Where the wheelbase (L) and a center of mass halfway between the wheels and at height (h), with both wheels locked, reveals that the normal (vertical) forces at the wheels are
#32
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is no "force" pushing the rider over the bars. The only force is the bike pushing backwards due to the deceleration from the friction of the pads on rim and tyre on ground. You can calculate this force indirectly by measuring braking-distance from a given-speed at maximum-deceleration. Plug into these two physics equations to arrive at deceleration-G:
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
V=at
D=1/2at^2 ; substitute for t in 2nd-equation gives
a=1/2(V^2/D) = deceleration rate in G
The actual weight-transfer amount to the front-tyre can be calculated based upon deceleration-G, wheelbase and COG-height:
where:
Lf = load on front-wheel
Lr = load on rear-wheel
d = static weight-distribution on front wheel (fraction or percentage)
G = static total weight
B = braking-force in G
h = center-of-gravity height
w = wheelbase
And at some point when braking-force is increased more and more, the rear-wheel WILL lift off the ground and you'll get 100% of the braking-force from the front-tyre. Skilled riders are able to brake with the rear-tyre skipping up and down slightly. Adding more lever-force at this point will not result in any faster deceleration, but it will raise the rear-tyre ever higher and higher...
Trying to analyze your theory and calculations I realized that I was looking in the wrong place for answer. Thus in order to come up with the right answer I have to look at the longitudinal stability because we have to consider in the first place mechanical forces generated by the a bike.
Where the wheelbase (L) with a center of mass halfway between the wheels at height (h) and where both wheels are locked, will make that the normal (vertical) forces at the wheels for the rear wheel and
Now, the frictional (horizontal) force is Fr = μNr (rear wheel) and Ff = μNf (front wheel), where (μ) is the friction coefficient, (m) is the mass and (g) is the acceleration of gravity.
Based on this theorem we have
At his point the normal force of the rear wheel will be negative and the bike will flip over.
Please, please... .. no pictures, no autographs.. . (crowd cheering in awe)
#33
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My dear friend,
I realize that winter is upon us, and we are often shut up within our respective laboratories, but seriously, put your slide rule away and go ride your bike. Clearly, you are smart as a whip (whatever that is supposed to mean), and will figure out this mystery before anyone else. Or, are you just looking for an argument to pass the winter solstice, hmm?
I realize that winter is upon us, and we are often shut up within our respective laboratories, but seriously, put your slide rule away and go ride your bike. Clearly, you are smart as a whip (whatever that is supposed to mean), and will figure out this mystery before anyone else. Or, are you just looking for an argument to pass the winter solstice, hmm?
I wish was that easy. If I would have choose any pass time subject that would have been girls, soccer or 9/11 conspiracy theory.
"smart as a whip".. .. is that a good or a bad thing?!?
#34
Uber Goober
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efD-tiNmgR4
Do a search on youtube for "bike" and "endo"- there's a lot on there, with bicyles and motorcycles.
Note that the intentional endos involve a good bit of body movement relative to the bike, and are nothing like a free-body problem.
Do a search on youtube for "bike" and "endo"- there's a lot on there, with bicyles and motorcycles.
Note that the intentional endos involve a good bit of body movement relative to the bike, and are nothing like a free-body problem.
#35
Gemutlichkeit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I think "smart as a whip" is a play on words from the 19th century, and may have little meaning in our highly technical existance: a drover who was good at driving a team of oxen or horses knew exactly how to just barely touch the animal to get it's attention. He would be considered "a smart whip." A stupid drover just beat the animals because it got them going, but it was considered poor form.
#36
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think "smart as a whip" is a play on words from the 19th century, and may have little meaning in our highly technical existance: a drover who was good at driving a team of oxen or horses knew exactly how to just barely touch the animal to get it's attention. He would be considered "a smart whip." A stupid drover just beat the animals because it got them going, but it was considered poor form.
#37
Senior Member
And at the same time, you want to slide your butt back and down so your tummy is on the seat. This changes COG-height (h) dynamically. Also the tyre's friction-coefficient (u) is not constant and varies with vertical-loading. So while total total load (N) remains constant, the change from 50/50 weight-distribution to 100/0% on the front (Nf), doubling the front-tyre's normal-force won't result in double the traction. Depending upon how you juggle the braking-modulation and lowering height h, you may actually slide the front-tyre before developing enough deceleration-force to go over the bars:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aus
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My dear friend, dismissing something without contributing with a replacement theory, thus substituting the previous one, does not make you more knowledgeable, nor demonstrate that I am wrong and your are right (or me incorrect and you correct), and certainly you are not entertaining a constructive discussion.
Your answer would have been more regarded if you would have say: "This is incorrect. This is what I believe to be correct.. .. etc, etc... based on ... . etc, etc"
But thank you for your insight anyway.
By the way, do you have any "correct" theory that you'd like to share with us?
Your answer would have been more regarded if you would have say: "This is incorrect. This is what I believe to be correct.. .. etc, etc... based on ... . etc, etc"
But thank you for your insight anyway.
By the way, do you have any "correct" theory that you'd like to share with us?
And while I have the chance, thanks to the people who have posted the humorous replies, you've made my night.
#39
Senior Member
I've braked with rear wheel liftoff successfully a few times but on one occasion I had almost slowed to a stop when my wheel hit a small obstacle and up I went. I hung there for a bit, still on the bike and looking straight ahead at the ground below me, and then my front wheel folded. I would have been better off if I released the brake and rolled over the obstacle but it was a small bike on its side and and the twelve year old owner was still on it.
#40
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Common sense my dear friend.. .. common sense.. .
- "Maximum braking occurs when the front brake is applied so hard that the rear wheel is just about to lift off. At that point, the slightest amount of rear brake will cause the rear wheel to skid"
- "the most effective technique for powerful stopping is to use the front brake almost exclusively"
- "the most effective technique for powerful stopping is to use the front brake almost exclusively"
- "When you’re stopping -- in a car, on a bike or on foot -- your weight shifts to the front."
- "The front brake is actually 70-90% of your braking power"
... just to name a few
Any way.. .. take good care of your heart my dear friend.. .. you got me worried a tad knowing that you get bothered so easily.. ..
Best regards,
SR
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 102
Bikes: Cannondale t2000, Schwinn Moab mountain bike, Specialized allez cro-mo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
physics?
I don't know what you call it but when I went over my bars a couple weeks ago I called it "Oh sh_t.
#42
Time for a change.
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Just a couple of observations and these have been extreme cases that have happened to me. First of all on a Tandem. Lots of weight to hold a bike down and top quality disc brakes. Tested the brakes to see how effective they are and jammed on the brakes on a dry road at 40mph. Rear wheel lifted but there is no way a Tandem is going to endo. Offroad on an mtb and just about to tackle a technical bit of track downhill at slow speed. Too much front brake and straight over into face plant.
Now on the road- And take it that the road is perfectly dry and that sufficient speed is there to be able to lift the rear wheel under braking. It would take a very effective brake to keep the amount of braking force on the front wheel to enable it to stop the front wheel and if there was enough force to do that- The Sninny tyres would skid in preference to keep the wheel braking to enable the bike to endo. I have had this happen once and I did not endo. Just lost the front wheel grip and fell over sideways. What would normally happedn is that under hard braking the rear wheel would have the weight lifted off it and the rear tyre lose grip and skid. At that point the natural rider reaction would be to release the brakes a bit or put more weight over the rear wheel to regain braking control.
Then again- Endo's are possible on all bikes but this is normally caused by the front wheel hitting an imovable object like a Dog- Car or tree. Not the usual situation on a normal bike ride.
Or Do you Know Better?
Now on the road- And take it that the road is perfectly dry and that sufficient speed is there to be able to lift the rear wheel under braking. It would take a very effective brake to keep the amount of braking force on the front wheel to enable it to stop the front wheel and if there was enough force to do that- The Sninny tyres would skid in preference to keep the wheel braking to enable the bike to endo. I have had this happen once and I did not endo. Just lost the front wheel grip and fell over sideways. What would normally happedn is that under hard braking the rear wheel would have the weight lifted off it and the rear tyre lose grip and skid. At that point the natural rider reaction would be to release the brakes a bit or put more weight over the rear wheel to regain braking control.
Then again- Endo's are possible on all bikes but this is normally caused by the front wheel hitting an imovable object like a Dog- Car or tree. Not the usual situation on a normal bike ride.
Or Do you Know Better?
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
Last edited by stapfam; 12-16-07 at 03:30 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
...Now on the road- And take it that the road is perfectly dry and that sufficient speed is there to be able to lift the rear wheel under braking. It would take a very effective brake to keep the amount of braking force on the front wheel to enable it to stop the front wheel and if there was enough force to do that....
And some are less likely to flip forward in a crash than others, as well: witness the Ryan/FOMAC/Avatar-2000 types, one current example from another company would be the Longbikes Slipstream. With this style of bike, if you crash, you always do so feet-first, and there's no parts of the bicycle to get entangled in as you are making your "unscheduled dismount". The riding position is a matter of taste however, and the Slipstream is a nice but expensive piece of work.
~
#44
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
LOL!!! That was funny! I'll remember this one
I you ride at a regular speed 20-25 km/h yes. However, if the bike would be tested in the crash lab environment, and the speed will be increased at 120km/h, and the front brakes will be instantly deployed at 100% braking power, chances are, Slipstream too will flip over.
I do understand that some bike are more stable than others, and in the ideal riding conditions the wheel base parameter will make all the difference in an event of a frontal (and perfectly perpendicular) crash... ...
As well I know that the rider's skill makes all the difference in the emergency braking situation as well as the amount of force the riders applies on the front brake (well.. .. technically on the brake levers on the handle bar) and all that, but that was not my initial query "if someone can flip over or not"
The question was, as far as the physics is concerned, what are called the forces pushing the rider and how can one calculate them. (mass, distance and speed in meters per second, all the good stuff)
My topic does not refer to this... the beautiful blue bicycle
but to this...
and this...
(see video on Youtube)
I you ride at a regular speed 20-25 km/h yes. However, if the bike would be tested in the crash lab environment, and the speed will be increased at 120km/h, and the front brakes will be instantly deployed at 100% braking power, chances are, Slipstream too will flip over.
I do understand that some bike are more stable than others, and in the ideal riding conditions the wheel base parameter will make all the difference in an event of a frontal (and perfectly perpendicular) crash... ...
As well I know that the rider's skill makes all the difference in the emergency braking situation as well as the amount of force the riders applies on the front brake (well.. .. technically on the brake levers on the handle bar) and all that, but that was not my initial query "if someone can flip over or not"
The question was, as far as the physics is concerned, what are called the forces pushing the rider and how can one calculate them. (mass, distance and speed in meters per second, all the good stuff)
My topic does not refer to this... the beautiful blue bicycle
but to this...
and this...
(see video on Youtube)
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Which leads back to the age old question of brake lever/caliper orientation.
I'm right handed and have the front brake lever on the RIGHT side of the handlebars.
Motorcycle-esque.
That way my skilled hand is controling the important front brake for better modulation.
And when braking hard, I shift my weight towards the back.
That's what Miguel Duhammel does when he hits 180 on the straightaway and still enters the next corner at 70. That's mastering the front brake.
Like Grolby said.
#46
Navy Recruiter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 500
Bikes: Trek VRX 300; Scott Speedster S2; Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
47% of all statistics are made up on the spot...or maybe it was 48%.
-Barry-
-Barry-
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bossier City, La
Posts: 628
Bikes: 70's Motobecane, 89 Centurion Ironman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
[
Ohh but there is my friend.. .. just do a brief Google search and you'll find tons of statistics.
... just to name a few
Thanks for the links. I had an "over the bar experience" with my first 10 speed when I was 15 and I used the front brake only. Sheldon is right when he says applying the right pressure because if you "lock em up", and you going at least 16 mph, you will go over the bars.
Ohh but there is my friend.. .. just do a brief Google search and you'll find tons of statistics.
- "Maximum braking occurs when the front brake is applied so hard that the rear wheel is just about to lift off. At that point, the slightest amount of rear brake will cause the rear wheel to skid"
- "the most effective technique for powerful stopping is to use the front brake almost exclusively"
- "the most effective technique for powerful stopping is to use the front brake almost exclusively"
- "When you’re stopping -- in a car, on a bike or on foot -- your weight shifts to the front."
- "The front brake is actually 70-90% of your braking power"
... just to name a few
Thanks for the links. I had an "over the bar experience" with my first 10 speed when I was 15 and I used the front brake only. Sheldon is right when he says applying the right pressure because if you "lock em up", and you going at least 16 mph, you will go over the bars.
#48
Idea Investor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
[
... just to name a few
Thanks for the links. I had an "over the bar experience" with my first 10 speed when I was 15 and I used the front brake only. Sheldon is right when he says applying the right pressure because if you "lock em up", and you going at least 16 mph, you will go over the bars.
... just to name a few
Thanks for the links. I had an "over the bar experience" with my first 10 speed when I was 15 and I used the front brake only. Sheldon is right when he says applying the right pressure because if you "lock em up", and you going at least 16 mph, you will go over the bars.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bossier City, La
Posts: 628
Bikes: 70's Motobecane, 89 Centurion Ironman
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, you are right also. I was just reading from the link. Since we have this issue taken care of, we can now move on to the real issue. Let's design some "Anti-Lock" front brakes and market them.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I agree with his theory in general, but his "dry pavement" approximation just doesn't fit many of the road surfaces I ride on throughout the year. And of course, road cycling is only one branch of the sport.