Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-07, 10:06 PM   #1
thebikeguy
Smiling and Waving
Thread Starter
 
thebikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Merrickville,Canada
Bikes: -
Posts: 364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Steel vs aluminum.

**

Last edited by thebikeguy; 01-10-08 at 01:11 AM.
thebikeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-07, 10:25 PM   #2
Banzai
Jet Jockey
 
Banzai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD9, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Nashbar X-frame bike.
Posts: 4,364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Countdown to the next steel v. aluminum fight in 5...4...3...
__________________
Good night...and good luck
Banzai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-07, 11:10 PM   #3
StephenH
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 11,286
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
"Would a 150 lb rider on a 30 lb bike have an advantage over a 220 lb rider on a 10 lb bike?" The only advantage would be if he were more fit. I would expect each rider to go faster on the lighter bike, other things being equal.
StephenH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 12:28 AM   #4
maddyfish
Senior Member
 
maddyfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ky. and FL.
Bikes: KHS steel SS
Posts: 3,944
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
steel vs alum I don't know. But I have been in great cardio shape at 195 pounds, and average cardio shape at 165 pounds. I am MUCH MUCH MUCH faster in average cardio condition at 165 pounds, than in great cardio shape at 195.
maddyfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 06:34 AM   #5
geo8rge
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,012
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The person with the 30 lb bike will have the advantage because they will have saved US$5000 or so.

The heavier you are the more efficiency of the components is important as percentage wise knocking a few pounds off a 200 lb package does not change much.
__________________
2000 Montague CX, I do not recommend it, but still ride it.
Strida 3, I recommend it for rides < 10mi wo steep hills.
2006 Rowbike 720 Sport, I recommend it as an exercise bike.
1996 Birdy, Recommend.
Wieleder CARiBIKE (folding), decent frame.
geo8rge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 07:08 AM   #6
BarracksSi
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
 
BarracksSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Bikes: Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
Posts: 13,858
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If the weight difference mattered at all, it would've likely been in the wheels.

Other than that, you're just faster, that's all.
BarracksSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 08:52 AM   #7
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Posts: 8,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The lighter rider in the 30# bike would, as the 220# rider in the 10# bike would have the bike fold up under them.
DieselDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 11:23 AM   #8
Doug5150
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,661
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebikeguy View Post
Would a 150 lb rider on a 30 lb bike have an advantage over a 220 lb rider on a 10 lb bike?...
Firstly--10 lbs is kinda light for a bike.

Secondly--a 150-lb rider will definitely have an advantage over a 220-lb rider, just based on their weights. Most of the time there's no use for the extra power that a 220-lb rider could put out, so carrying the muscle mass is just more of a burden.

There's a reason you don't see any marathon runners with huge, bulging muscles. Endurance sports do not favor the biggest and strongest.
~
Doug5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 02:13 PM   #9
MKahrl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Bikes: Rivendell A.Homer Hilsen, Paramount P13, (4) Falcon bicycles, Mondia Special, Rodriguez Tandem
Posts: 1,028
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
On flat ground weight doesn't really matter. The lighter rider may have an advantage if he is smaller and has less frontal area. Climbing the rider with the lighter system, bike + rider, will have the advantage that will not completely made up for in descents. The rider with the lighter wheels when accelerating from a dead stop will have an advantage that is so infinitesimally small as to be unmeasurable by Newtonian physics but will none the less offer monstrously huge psychological benefits.

30 lbs isn't that heavy.

And none of this is important compared to the really big advantage that the more fit rider has.
MKahrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-07, 11:21 PM   #10
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 11,606
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
It's more of a question of a 180# bike+rider combo vs. a 230# bike+rider. The 230# combo has A LOT of extra mass to contend with (50#) and I doubt your friend has 28% more lung-capacity or muscle-strength than you just to be even. I've lost about 60# from my most-heavy weight and I can tell you that the weight on the body makes a MUCH more significant impact on performance than the weight of the bikes.

It actually hurts more than weight on the bike because that extra weight results in a much larger body-size and blocks more wind (heavy bikes don't block any more wind than light bikes). AND that flab steals oxygen and energy from your muscles just to keep itself alive, yet contributes no power to make you go faster. About the only place the extra weight would help is on a downhill straightaway.
DannoXYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-07, 05:45 PM   #11
rmfnla
Senior Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: La La Land (We love it!)
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
Posts: 6,049
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 156 Post(s)
Rider ability is far more important than equipment.

When I was in college (and riding a lot) we had a CAT-1 racer join us for a 50-mile loop of Northern Florida (Gainesville). He was on a borrowed Raleigh Record (steel wheels, etc) and pulling his kid in a Bugger; we were all on our Campy ego boosters and he still lead the way.

As Lance's book title says, it's not about the bike (or how much it weighs).
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-07, 06:11 PM   #12
thebikeguy
Smiling and Waving
Thread Starter
 
thebikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Merrickville,Canada
Bikes: -
Posts: 364
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
**

Last edited by thebikeguy; 01-10-08 at 01:11 AM.
thebikeguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 PM.