Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-17-08, 01:59 PM   #1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bike Size

I am looking to replace a 15 year old 20" Trek 700 with a Trek 7200 or 7300. I'm in my 50's and 5'10-1/2" or 5'11" with a 32" inseam. The salesman said a 17.5" would be a good fit (perhaps because that's the only size they had in stock). I almost touch the top tube on the 20" when standing over it and have a couple of inches of space from the top tube on the 17.5". I don't know if the 17.5 or 20" is more comfortable, as the shop doesn't have a 20" in stock. Is there a set formula for determining the proper size?
JagAddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-08, 03:16 PM   #2
Senior Member
SweetLou's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Kind of, there are fitting calculators on the web where you put in your measurements, inseam, arm length, overall height, etc. and out comes a recommendation. But not everyone wants what that program says is best. For me, it is the top tube length that matters the most. I have short legs and a long torso for my size. None of my bikes have any standover clearance. The older 2 inches of standover is the size to get method would make none of my bikes fit me.

If I were you, I would do one of a couple of things.
1. If the bike you ride now is comfortable, measure the top tube length and get the bike that is the same.
2. Get a fitting done at a bike shop.
3. Ride each size at go decide from that.

If you are unsure of what size is best for you, I would not buy a bike that I haven't test ridden.
SweetLou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-08, 03:18 PM   #3
Abneycat's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Base of the Rocky Mountains, Canada. Wonderous things!
Bikes: 2010 Cannondale Hooligan 3
Posts: 1,431
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
There isn't a set formula, really: due to some bicycles having differently shaped top tubes (different angles, dropping, so on), the height of the tube shouldn't be the guiding factor unless its uncomfortable to stand over.

Have you taken a ride on the 17.5" and felt if you thought it was too cramped?
Abneycat is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 PM.