Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Man on Bike vs Man on Horse - Which is faster???...

    Consider a man on a Mountain bike in a competition just a tad over 22 Miles against man on a horse. Who do you think would win and under what circumstances???.

    I am considering all types of horses and terrain. The course is over rough Country ground, mainly flat with the horse running on the grass alongside.

    Also, Could an endrance runner stand a chance of beating the horse over the same course and distance???...

    Thoughts???...
    Last edited by Vitamin X; 10-21-03 at 04:05 AM.
    You do not get into Cycling, Cycling gets into you

    Vitamin X

  2. #2
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    18,898
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    While a horse can run faster, it loses in endurance. So over the long haul, the mountain biker will pull the horse in.13.1 miles, the MTB would probably prevail. Also, an endurance runner would have a really good shot at it.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  3. #3
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitamin X
    Consider a man on a Mountain bike in a competition just a tad over 22 Miles against man on a horse. Who do you think would win and under what circumstances???.

    I am considering all types of horses and terrain. The course is over rough Country ground, mainly flat with the horse running on the grass alongside.

    Also, Could an endrance runner stand a chance of beating the horse over the same course and distance???...

    Thoughts???...
    Have you been reading Walden?
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Allister
    Have you been reading Walden?
    Walden???...
    You do not get into Cycling, Cycling gets into you

    Vitamin X

  5. #5
    Bike Happy DanFromDetroit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI USA
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At one point in his life Jesse Owens was reduced to racing with horses. He used to beat them in short sprints. I guess it takes longer for a horse to get up to speed.

    Dan
    There is nothing homlier than the face on your last dime.
    --John Wildcat, Greenback Friend

  6. #6
    A Lost Member aluckyfiji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Aiken, SC
    My Bikes
    '03 Felt 35R, ~'88 Basso fixie
    Posts
    359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Funny Cide (the 2003 Kuntucky Derby winner) ran a 2:01.19 for 1.25 miles, which puts him at about 37.5mph
    So for the distance no man can run that fast, and I dont think that sprinters can hold up that speed for that long of a distance
    I personally think that if a horse is in shape, then it can beat a mtb on the same course, saying that it is rideable by both
    just my thoughts
    "Please don't be mad. I know we were supposed to bequeath to the next generation a world better than the one we were handed. So, sorry."
    -Jon Stewart at W&M Commencement

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by aluckyfiji
    Funny Cide (the 2003 Kuntucky Derby winner) ran a 2:01.19 for 1.25 miles, which puts him at about 37.5mph. So for the distance no man can run that fast, and I dont think that sprinters can hold up that speed for that long of a distance. I personally think that if a horse is in shape, then it can beat a mtb on the same course, saying that it is rideable by both
    just my thoughts
    You have lost the point...

    The course is no where near 1.25 Miles in length, its 22 Miles... We all ready know horses can outrun daylight, but this isn't a sprint, Are horses quick over an endurance distance???...

    Read my post again...

    Quote Originally Posted by Vitamin X
    Consider a man on a Mountain bike in a competition just a tad over 22 Miles against man on a horse. Who do you think would win and under what circumstances???.

    I am considering all types of horses and terrain. The course is over rough Country ground, mainly flat with the horse running on the grass alongside.

    Also, Could an endrance runner stand a chance of beating the horse over the same course and distance???...

    Thoughts???...

    A sprinter couldn't even come close to racing at speeds of 37MPH. They usually travel at 27-28MPH and can only hold that for 150-200 Metres.
    You do not get into Cycling, Cycling gets into you

    Vitamin X

  8. #8
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DanFromDetroit
    At one point in his life Jesse Owens was reduced to racing with horses. He used to beat them in short sprints. I guess it takes longer for a horse to get up to speed.

    Dan
    I read about that one Dan. But the race was rigged! First it was short. And second, the beginning of the race was signalled by a starter ******. They fired the ****** nearly in the horse's ear so while the horse was recovering from the shock and the "What the @*#$ was that!", Jesse was flying down the track.

  9. #9
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitamin X
    Consider a man on a Mountain bike in a competition just a tad over 22 Miles against man on a horse. Who do you think would win and under what circumstances???.

    I am considering all types of horses and terrain. The course is over rough Country ground, mainly flat with the horse running on the grass alongside.

    Also, Could an endrance runner stand a chance of beating the horse over the same course and distance???...

    Thoughts???...
    Well, I think it depends on the course. A really nasty technical course would slow the mountain biker and probably have less effect on the horse. Four legs trump wheels on really nasty terrain. You can ride a horse over stuff that you would never think of riding a mountain bike. You don't see mountain bikes in steeple chases now do you? I know if you threw in a nice river to ford, the horse would win swimming away. Now on really steep grades, you do have to get off a horse and walk. But that is really steep stuff. I don't know how horses compare against mountain bikes on going up grades. Also cyclists have a big advantage over horses on downhills - wheels win here.

    Now, for 22 miles a road cyclist can scorch a horse. A good local racer can do that in less then an hour and I don't think that there is a horse alive that can do that.

    An endurance runner would really not have a chance against a horse in 22 miles. Runners are just too slow. Cavalry could travel 100+ miles in a day and anything over 25 miles is a lot for infantry. Thing is that you use up horses fast if you keep them at it day after day and people seem to recover better. For long distances, humans get competitive because horses take a long time to eat. People can catch horses just by chasing them on foot. It just takes a long time and a lot of determination.

    I understand that in England they have a cross country race with people on mountain bikes, horses and riders and runners competing. I don't know which group ends up winning though.

  10. #10
    Very Senior Member MikeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Central Pa
    My Bikes
    2000 Bianchi San Remo and a mint 1984 Trek 720
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There was a whole magazine article comparing man to horse in a recent edition of a bicycle magazine published by the Saturn car company. They sponsor a bike team and this free mag was all about cycling - pretty good articles. I got a copy at a local cycle event. Don't know if the Saturn Cycling team magazine is on line or not.
    It's better to cycle through life than to drive by it.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeR
    There was a whole magazine article comparing man to horse in a recent edition of a bicycle magazine.
    So what was the outcome???...
    You do not get into Cycling, Cycling gets into you

    Vitamin X

  12. #12
    Very Senior Member MikeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Central Pa
    My Bikes
    2000 Bianchi San Remo and a mint 1984 Trek 720
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitamin X
    So what was the outcome???...
    I had to wait until I got home to find the article again. It’s a whole page of data. Comparing a horse and rider to a bike and rider – weight, calories, height, race speed etc.

    There’s also a side bar that tells a story of Jack Simes “a one time Olympian and legend in American pro cycling circles”. In 1972, in New York as a promotional stunt for the Olympics Jacke raced a harness racer around a standard harness track. The account is very exciting, but the result is that Jack won by 21 lengths.
    It's better to cycle through life than to drive by it.

  13. #13
    Very Senior Member MikeR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Central Pa
    My Bikes
    2000 Bianchi San Remo and a mint 1984 Trek 720
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know you asked about mountain bikes, but I ride a road bike and have passed horses. There are Amish buggies around here (central Pa). They don't race but they go down the road at a pretty good clip. They sometimes have a long way to go so they are trotting pretty well. I'm no racer but I can catch and pass them without too much trouble. They go a little faster than I can on the uphill, but I am faster on the flats and (of course) downhill.
    It's better to cycle through life than to drive by it.

  14. #14
    Yes that's Me lamajo25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Payson AZ
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Let's go with the possibility of a moderately rough trail. If a horse can do a mile and a quarter in 2 minutes and at 37 miles an hour, what do you think the average speed of the cyclist would be? My guess would be that they could keep up a pace of about 15 miles an hour. The horse is going more than twice that speed though. I would say that the horse would have time to cool down between sprints and would probably be able to keep out front. And to be honest with you 15 is probably more than the cyclist can actually do.

  15. #15
    Every lane is a bike lane Chris L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
    Posts
    9,622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was chasing a truck up a 14% grade on my bike a couple of weeks ago. I gave him some start and was seriously reeling him in until the hill levelled out. I think he was carrying horses. Does that count?
    "I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
    "We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
    My blog.
    My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.

  16. #16
    Yes that's Me lamajo25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Payson AZ
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We'll give that one to ya Chris. That's pretty funny.

  17. #17
    cycle-powered nathank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
    My Bikes
    '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
    Posts
    1,848
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hm... interesting question to consider...

    it all depends on the course: length and difficulty.

    i ride extreme XC/freeride and so i often ride very steep/rocky technical _hiking_ trails in the Alps. on these trails _HIKERS_ sometimes pass me on the technical sections as all the rocks, fallen logs and huge obstacles slow me down more than those one foot (plus dismounting and walking for really HUGE stuff). of course as soon as the trail gets less technical i catch up and blast by them (not rudely and unsafely of course)

    first assume the runner, the horse and the MTBer are all fit and skilled...

    i would say on a non-technical course the MTBer would almost always win:
    * uphill:
    -- horse slightly faster i think (10)
    -- MTB(5) about the same speed as a runner(5) (i did the Zugspitz mountain run in July and ran up 20-30% grades for 2200meters vertical and i also ride the same course on my MTB in roughly the same speed/time. the top pro runners were faster than me (roughly 2 hours for the 2200meters) but then pro hillclimb cyclists are also faster than me by roughly the same (for SHORT distance the runner is faster but cannot sprint the whole way, so i think it is roughly the same --- probably for >30% the runner is faster and you reach a point where the cyclist can no longer ride due to traction, especially if dirt/gravel)
    *on the flat:
    --- MTB faster (10)
    --- horse nearly as fast (8)
    --- runner slower (5)
    *downhill:
    --- MTB fastest by far (10)
    --- horse slower (3)
    --- runner much slower (1)

    now on a VERY technical course where the MTBer would have major obstacles, maybe small cliffs, streams to ford, etc, i think on a very technical course the horse would win:
    --- horse can navigate amazing terrain with 4 long legs and jumping ability (10)
    --- runner can navigate quite a bit too (8)
    --- but even a trials, downhill or freeride MTBer gets significantly slowed down by obstacles like major drops, fallen logs, stream crossing, etc (1)

    *** my number is a 1-10 estimate, 10 being best, for that type

    Note: i was verysurprized a few years ago in an XC MTB race where the boyfriend of one of the top women ran alongside her (he was a pro distance/hillclimb runner) and actually waited for her at the top of the hills and until the last descent was with her the whole race (about 15 mile technical XC course, with the last descent being maybe 4 miles, so he ran about 11) -- i passed him but only b/c he waited for his girlfriend
    why drive when you can ride?
    now a fully certified German MTB Guide! (DAV)

  18. #18
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lamajo25
    Let's go with the possibility of a moderately rough trail. If a horse can do a mile and a quarter in 2 minutes and at 37 miles an hour, what do you think the average speed of the cyclist would be? My guess would be that they could keep up a pace of about 15 miles an hour. The horse is going more than twice that speed though. I would say that the horse would have time to cool down between sprints and would probably be able to keep out front. And to be honest with you 15 is probably more than the cyclist can actually do.

    Well, first off not any old horse can do 37 mph. That was a champion race horse on a perfect surface running as fast as he could. He can not do that on a trail and he can not do it far. Also, racing is extremely taxing. The horse can not just catch his breath and do it again.

    I really do not think that a horse can sustain 15 mph for very long. That is a lot faster then you think. Cavalry on the march generally averaged about 7 mph.

    Now there are endurance races for horses. There are some held out in CA where the horses do 100 miles in a day. But they have mandatory stops and vet checks. 100 miles in a day is a really serious distance for a horse and in order to do it, the horse has to be in superb shape and have a good rider. A poor rider can kill a horse surprisingly quickly.

  19. #19
    bac
    bac is offline
    Senior Member bac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    My Bikes
    Too many to list!
    Posts
    7,487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Vitamin X
    Thoughts???...
    Horse.

  20. #20
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I found the race in England that I was thinking of. It is the William Hill Man vs Horse Marathon held in Wales. It is a horse against a runner on a trail. It might be pretty hilly. The winning horse recently had a time of just over 2 hours for an average speed of 11 mph. In 24 years, no human runner has beaten the winning horse. Humans have come surprisingly close though, lagging by just a couple of minutes.

    I would think for that distance and course, a strong mountain biker should have no problem winning. Of course, on a paved road, any recreational cyclist could win easily.

  21. #21
    Mercrudgeon Bikedud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    NW, Georgia
    My Bikes
    Favorites- Giant TCR Advanced SL, Torelli Corsa Strada, Schwinn Paramount Titanium, Fat Chance Wicked, Lemond Zurich, Specialized Allez SE, Trek 930, others
    Posts
    597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the 2003 endurance horse racng championship (AERC ) the fastest horse finished 50 miles with a 16.7kph average. The course was trails near Red Rock, Nevada.

    Sounds like a cyclist vs. equestrian race might be close.
    The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit.
    Somerset Maugham

  22. #22
    Šāy la`xe Šạp của tōi bombusben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    milwaukee
    Posts
    436
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think a cyclist would have a problem beating a horse. A mtb rider (and I don't think he was a top ranking pro) beat the horse by 3 min in the 1989 marathon Pat mentioned (William Hill Man vs Horse)
    I would also bet that an elite marathoner could beat a horse over 22 miles on an actual marathon course (no river fording etc)

  23. #23
    Senior Member Bobatin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what do you think the average speed of the cyclist would be? My guess would be that they could keep up a pace of about 15 miles an hour.
    I have ridden 100 miles in 5 hours. The pros ride 100 miles in less than 4 hours.
    So, if you're in the car, waiting impatiently. . . get over it - you're not that special.
    "Its not what you take when you leave, Its what you leave when you go."
    Some country and western song

  24. #24
    A Lost Member aluckyfiji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Aiken, SC
    My Bikes
    '03 Felt 35R, ~'88 Basso fixie
    Posts
    359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Something that has to be keep in mind when comparing a horse to a bike... the horse is an animal and that means that it has to eat and drink, something that a bike does not, this adds time
    In endurance racing (for horses) the competators have to stop at check point along the way where the horse is examined (i.e. pulse and temperature) to prevent over heating of the horse, so there are things that make a horse sound like it is going slower then it really is
    The winner finished in 11 and a half hours for 100miles, which I know that a biker could beat, but the trails are for the most part not bikeable and there are creek crossing and things of that nature
    http://www.equisearch.com/equiwire/r...02/equset3204/
    I am still pulling for the horse (but not by much) on a very difficult XC course, but it all depends on the case
    "Please don't be mad. I know we were supposed to bequeath to the next generation a world better than the one we were handed. So, sorry."
    -Jon Stewart at W&M Commencement

  25. #25
    Mercrudgeon Bikedud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    NW, Georgia
    My Bikes
    Favorites- Giant TCR Advanced SL, Torelli Corsa Strada, Schwinn Paramount Titanium, Fat Chance Wicked, Lemond Zurich, Specialized Allez SE, Trek 930, others
    Posts
    597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by aluckyfiji
    I am still pulling for the horse (but not by much) on a very difficult XC course, but it all depends on the case
    I agree. If an endurance horse can cover 50 miles at @ 10mph. He should be able to cover a little over twenty miles considerably faster. The course for the 50 mile AERC was very difficult terrain.
    http://www.homestead.com/qsendurance/files/NC50map.jpg

    I think it would be close.
    The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit.
    Somerset Maugham

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •