Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-04-03, 02:24 PM   #1
acantor
Macro Geek
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Bikes: True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985
Posts: 1,248
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
XTR vs. XT and Ultegra vs. 105

I am in the process of choosing components for a custom-built touring bicycle. The bike will include mountain components (e.g., gears and derailleur), and road components (e.g., handlebars and brakes).

In terms of durability, mechanical precision, and ease of maintenance, what are the important differences between Ultegra and 105 stuff, and between XT and LX gear? I have already ruled out Durace and XTR components on the basis of price alone. My goal is to ensure that I make best use my bike budget. Will I notice a difference if I opt for the more expensive components? How can I save on components so that I can sink more money into the frame and fork?

I would especially appreciate hearing about people's experiences with Ultegra vs. 105 1) hubs and 2) STI brakes. However, any opinions about the relative merits (or disadvantages) of the different lines of components will also be appreciated.

Alan
acantor@interlog.com
acantor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 02:26 PM   #2
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Scccccrrrrrpppppptttttttt!

That's the sound of a can of worms getting opened!

I can notice a difference between 105 and Ultegra, but almost none between Ultegra and Dura Ace.

Same goes for LX to XT and XT to XTR.

I'd stick with Ultegra and XT level components for precision, and durability.

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 02:53 PM   #3
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by a2psyklnut
Scccccrrrrrpppppptttttttt!

That's the sound of a can of worms getting opened!

I can notice a difference between 105 and Ultegra, but almost none between Ultegra and Dura Ace.

Same goes for LX to XT and XT to XTR.

I'd stick with Ultegra and XT level components for precision, and durability.

L8R
I'll back that up.
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 03:11 PM   #4
SamDaBikinMan
Crank Crushing Redneck
 
SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Posts: 2,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A2 and Raiyn has it right. XTR and DURA ACE are good if you just want to get the best and most expensive without getting a proportional increase in performance.

I have had them all and I'd just as soon have Ultegra and XT as anything.

Interestingly enough the absolute best longevity I ever got from a set of road wheels came from a set of RX100 road hubs that came on an entry level road bike I bought years ago. those wheels and hubs would not die. I have trashed wheels that cost 5 times as much since and in short order.

I am convinced that in the process of creating super light components the sacrafice is in its useful lifespan. More maintenance is required to keep the ultra high grade stuff working also. I have had frequent adjustments made to my dura ace derailleurs while my older Ultegra stays dialed in with little or no maintenance.
SamDaBikinMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 03:22 PM   #5
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Anything made by Chris King is the exception. If you want to buy a headset you don't ever have to worry about get a Chris King!

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 03:35 PM   #6
georgesnatcher
newbie newbie
 
georgesnatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Happy to be in FLORIDA
Bikes: Titanium Indy Fab 29" mtb
Posts: 633
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I agree about the DA and Ultegra, but. I think when it comes to MTB components XTR is way beyond XT. Don't get me wrong XT is a really good group (had it on my last bike), I just find XTR to be smoother and more "accurate". Maybe you can find some old XTR at a good price and work it in. I really like their old rear der.
georgesnatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 04:18 PM   #7
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
XTR won't last as long as XT. That wonderful accuracy and lightweight comes at a price (and I'm not talking$$$).
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 05:21 PM   #8
SamDaBikinMan
Crank Crushing Redneck
 
SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Posts: 2,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Exactly Raiyn. I want more product life for my money than accuracy. Besides the accuracy is so good with even LX or Deore it is not even a significant issue. I have LX shifters on a bike right now that have been working fine for almost 5 years of steady riding.
SamDaBikinMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 05:28 PM   #9
JasBike
Senior Member
 
JasBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: CT
Bikes:
Posts: 496
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just thought I'd say that the accuracy of my XT is 100% perfect. I can't even imagine how to improve this derailer, and I don't see how XTR could be necessary
JasBike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 05:34 PM   #10
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm running an all XT driveline right now on My Rockhopper (except for the crankset and BB) and the only reason I upgraded to that was due to the fact i wanted the lower end (but gently used) Deore and LX stuff that the bike came with for my (originally Alivo) commuter bike.
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 07:56 PM   #11
georgesnatcher
newbie newbie
 
georgesnatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Happy to be in FLORIDA
Bikes: Titanium Indy Fab 29" mtb
Posts: 633
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess I'm spoiled then. I had Deore on one bike, XT on the next and XTR on my current one. I thought each move upwards was better than the last.
georgesnatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 08:09 PM   #12
SamDaBikinMan
Crank Crushing Redneck
 
SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Posts: 2,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I do not think it is an issue of better it is just an issue of is it good enough. But my personal experience with XTR was not of significant improvement that would compel me to pay the high pricetag again. Especially the new ultra high pricetag. But for me money is an object and acceptable performance does not require the gold plated stuff.

Good quality wheels will make a much larger difference than almost any upgrade. If weight is an issue then light tires will make the most difference. Tires and wheels/hubsets are the single most cumbersome parts of a bike. Poor choices here will make or break you.
SamDaBikinMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 08:24 PM   #13
Rich Clark
A Heart Needs a Home
 
Rich Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 1,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the levers have more to do with precision in the rear mech, anyway.

One one bike I have Ultegra levers and drivetrain but with an XTR RD (2001). It, of course, performs wonderfully.

On the other bike I recently replaced the rear lever (was a Sora, which wore out) with a 105 lever. This bike has an LX RD.

To be perfectly honest, to me there is very little (if any) noticeable difference in shifting performance between the Ultegra/XTR combo and the 105/LX combo in normal road riding on a touring-type bike. In critical applications, racing or precision technical off-road riding, maybe it would matter.

If I were building up a similar bike today I'd probably go with Ultegra and XT.

RichC
__________________
Training: 2002 Fuji Roubaix Pro (105 triple)
Commuting/Daytripping: 2001 Airborne Carpe Diem (Ultegra/XTR, touring wheels)
Commuting/Touring: 2000 Novara Randonee (Sora/Tiagra/LX, fenders, lights)
Rich Clark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-03, 10:38 PM   #14
FLYBYU
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 182
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would go with LX and 105 myself if you want to save money, all you get by upgrading is lighter weight which equals only a few grams. I had XTR on one of my mountain bikes (not the current XTR, it was a 2002) but I had nothing but troubles with the derailer going out of adjustment, the adjustment barrel would move all the time. As far as durability goes, on a derailer what is going to break down? You still have to replace XTR jockey wheels then same time that you have to replace any other, so why pay through the nose for nothing? Can't say how good Ultegra is, but I have all 105 on my road bike and it shifts fine and seems to be trouble free and durable, also simple to adjust.
FLYBYU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-03, 04:34 AM   #15
Richard D
Donating member
 
Richard D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Faversham, Kent, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 1,852
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It depends on your priorities - for example the 03 LX chainset only differed from the XT in that the granny ring was steel against the XT's ali inner - for the sake of a few grams the LX may be the longer lasting option.

Performance wise the differences in precision is non-existent.

With other components e.g. rear mech's you get do get slightly better bits, which may be more obvious.

As far as front mech performance goes, when they're new I think you're in 'Princess and the Pea' territory as to telling the difference in precision.

I'd look at it on a component by component basis
__________________
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
Richard D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-03, 06:09 AM   #16
mrfix
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: mass
Bikes:
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bottom line, If it's shimano deore or above or 105 or above, it works well. The feel of a system has a lot to do with tune, properly tuned you would be hard pressed to tell the difference between XT and XTR except for the new 960's, or the Ultegra and DA. The difference you would notice is if you were to ride a bike with a set of STI shifters that have been ridden for tons of miles, with a well maintained and tuned drive trane, the DA would still maintain its accuracy and the ultegra would start to feel sloppy. A lot of the precision riders feel with the DA system comes from the chain, the CN-7701 chain will improve the shifting on any Shimano drive system. The above posts are on the money, To build the most dependable touring bike I would opt for the XT/Ultegra, if you want ultra dependability go with bar end shifters. One other thing to consider for the crankset is the standard XT crankset, 26-36-48, for loaded touring you can't beat it, it's available in octalink and tapered square drive, the octalink is a better system and the cost is the same. The only difference between the compact and standard crankset aside of the ring size is, the compact set has alloy rings for the 44 and 32 and steel for the 22, the standard has alloy for the 48 and steel for the 36 and 26. But on a touring bike the weight would be unimportant and the steel is far more durable. On the wheel end of things the XT or Ultegra hubs are hard to beat, they're tough as they come and last forever at a reasonable price. On a touring bike I don't know if I would use the Chris King hubs, you need to carry the tools to repair them if a problem should occur, You can find parts and repair an XT or Ultegra hub anywhere.

Last edited by mrfix; 11-05-03 at 07:05 AM.
mrfix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-03, 12:12 AM   #17
slide13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie
Posts: 458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think the 105 and LX groups are the best values for your money out there. Most of the performance, technology and longevity of the higher end groups at a lower price. If your looking to build a quality bike on a budget, I think that is where the best choices are.

I recently built up a cyclocross/commuter out of road and mtb parts on a Surly Cross Check frame. I used XTR rear (new rapid rise), 105 front, XT cassette, FSA cross cranks (38/48), bar con shifters, Chris King hubs and headset. I'm very happy with all my drivetrain choices and wouldn't change a thing.
slide13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-03, 06:41 PM   #18
Avalanche325
Senior Member
 
Avalanche325's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Bikes: Litespeed Firenze / GT Avalanche
Posts: 3,162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would say go XT on the rear. You could do LX or XT on the front, that is not exactly precision shifting anyhow. I did wear one out, but it took 4 years.
Avalanche325 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-03, 08:06 PM   #19
Phatman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Bikes:
Posts: 3,411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slide13
I think the 105 and LX groups are the best values for your money out there. Most of the performance, technology and longevity of the higher end groups at a lower price. If your looking to build a quality bike on a budget, I think that is where the best choices are.

I recently built up a cyclocross/commuter out of road and mtb parts on a Surly Cross Check frame. I used XTR rear (new rapid rise), 105 front, XT cassette, FSA cross cranks (38/48), bar con shifters, Chris King hubs and headset. I'm very happy with all my drivetrain choices and wouldn't change a thing.
You built up a commuter with CK and XTR? Is your work on the other side of the planet?
Phatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-03, 08:10 PM   #20
late
Senior Member
 
late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Bikes:
Posts: 8,413
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 735 Post(s)
Location, location, location
For your rear der, megarange just makes sense. The Xt is nice, but LX is ok.
For the cranks, I use Ultegra. if you plan on heavy loads, then LX or XT cranks makes more sense. If you use mtb cranks, you may wind up with bar end shifters. If you have the Ultegra (or 105) cranks, I'd go with the Ultegra shifters. The XT hubs are pretty heavy.
late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-03, 11:40 PM   #21
slide13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Bikes: Gunnar Roadie
Posts: 458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hahaha....no, about 4 miles away. It isn't just a commuter really, more of an all arounder. I use it as my road bike, my off road bike, and my commuter. Basically my only bike. Plus, I work at a bike shop so I get a decent deal on the parts.

Spending 6+ years working in bike shops you gain a true appreciation for the finer things in the cycling world. I always wanted a bike built this way and I finally decided to do it. It still isn't perfect, I'd like Race Face cranks and some cool brakes, but I'm satisfied for now. Always been a big fan of Chris King parts, they arn't cheap, but they are the best IMO. After you get used to the almost instant ingagement, everything else just feels sloppy....plus you learn to love that sound.

I'll be the first to admit for the type and amount of riding I do my bike is complete overkill, but I like it. It's the first bike I've done where I've handpicked every component and it was a lot of fun.

Besides, I'm a shop guy, we're supposed to have cool bikes....I think is a job requirement or something
slide13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-03, 12:37 AM   #22
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slide13

Besides, I'm a shop guy, we're supposed to have cool bikes....I think is a job requirement or something
Ain't it the truth?
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM.