Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    I am a lonely visitor RegularGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Where even Richard Nixon has got soul
    My Bikes
    Michelle Pfieffer, the Carbon Fiber Wonder Bike: A Kestrel 200 SCI Repainted in glorious mango; Old Paintless, A Litespeed Obed; The Bike With No Name: A Bianchi Eros; RegularBike: A Parkpre Comp Ltd rebuilt as a singlespeed.
    Posts
    2,630
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why Lance has to win the TdF in 2004

    Okay...So I'm reading Every Second Counts and it occurs to me that Lance Armstrong has to win the 2004 Tour de France. He has to.

    I'm a fan, I'll admit. But I don't believe that Lance is either a god or Superman. He looked especially vulnerable in the 2003 TdF. The hounds will be snapping at his heels next year, but Lance has to win.

    Lance Armstrong is probably the most focused and dedicated competitor in professional cycling. His career is based on le Tour. He is criticized for being a one race rider and there is something to that. Despite the criticism, Lance owns the Tour de France.

    As remarkable as Lance's acheivements in the TdF have been, he still has something to prove. To date, he has done nothing that hasn't been done before. He is not the first American to win the Tour. He is not the first American to have won multiple tours. He is not the first rider to come back from the brink of death to win the Tour. Greg Lemond did all of these things first.

    This year, Lance joined an elite group of champions who have won five Tours de France, but he is not the first to have done so. He won five consecutive Tours, but Indurain already held that record. There is nothing that Lance has done that hasn't been done before.

    Lance Armstrong had to win the 1999 Tour de France after coming back from cancer, just to prove that he could. He had to win the 2000 Tour de France when Pantani and Ullrich re-entered the competition, just to prove that '99 wasn't a fluke. He had to win in '01, '02 and '03 to show that he could be a five-timer. He especially had to win in '03 because it was harder than ever.

    Now, he has to win in 2004. He still has something to prove.

    Rumors have been flying around linking him romantically to Sandra Bullock and Sheryl Crow. Has Lance gone Hollywood? Personally, I doubt it. I don't think Lance has the time or the inclination to let his head be turned. Not now. Not yet. Maybe next August.

    Lance still has to win the Tour de France in 2004. The only question is...can he?
    Religion is a good thing for good people and a bad thing for bad people. --H. Richard Niebuhr

  2. #2
    Not-so-Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Norfolk, England
    My Bikes
    Orbea Enol roadie, Fly Micromachine BMX, Fort Track fixed
    Posts
    805
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    True, but he is the only person to do all those things. He is the only American to have come back from the brink of death to win five consecutive Tours. That alone makes him different. But I agree, he has to win in 2004, not to prove he can win 6, not for the money, not for the glory, but simply because he is nothing (to himself) without his yellow jersey.

    If you read Graeme Obree's book you'll know what I mean. His attitude was 'I'd rather be dead than not break this hour record', and I feel Lance is exactly the same. If he's not winning the Tour, or preparing himself for another victory, he might as well not be alive.

    NB: Just my personal opinion, not based on fact.

  3. #3
    extra-t Resident's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The most biggest smoke-icus
    My Bikes
    Trek 520, Trek 5500, Cervelo Carbon Soloist
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    By winning this much, Lance has really pushed the envelope for the Tour riders. Hopefully, the teams will respond with fierce competition, and make next years' Tour even more dramatic.
    Unfortunately, North America doesn't have the rich cycling heritage as in Europe. Lance's win would set off a short lived media frenzy - that's all.

    I guess I'm questioning what Lance has to prove beyond physical feats. Does he, as an ambassador of cycling, have more to offer?
    Taking photos of your lovely planet...

  4. #4
    Senior Member danr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Midwest USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 8000 (I'm testing a prototype).
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see a commentating job on OLN in his near future.
    Does the perfect bike really exist?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Arkansas
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR1/Specialized Epic
    Posts
    607
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see Lance winning next year, retiring in Austin, and raising his kids. If I were him, I'd screw working and just ride everyday. A little mtbiking here a little road cycling there. Here a fork there a fork everywhere a fork, fork.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    58
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I expect when he retires from professional riding a sources of income will continue to be great. Apparently he owns the patent to the helmit he wears in the time trials, and I would expect a lifetime career with Trek and the Carmicheal training institute.

  7. #7
    don d.
    Guest

    nothing to prove

    Lance doesn't have any thing to prove to me. He already seems somewhat heroic in his accomplishments. He's won every kind of race more than once and the only real criticism of him as a rider is that he doesn't have a pro level sprint.

    If he wins a 6th TDF, it will mark him as one of the greatest all-around tour riders in the sports history. He will be given accolades at every subsequent TdF and will kinda be like Merckx, Hinault and Gimond -an everpresent Icon to the history of the sport.

    If he loses the 6th, he may finally find his fans in France whom Americans love to hate, but France loves the pathos of failure.

    Either way, he comes out a winner to me.

  8. #8
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why does Lance have to win a 6th Tour de France? It isn't as if the previous 6 time winners like Meryx and Indurain and others were slouches or anything. These people are cycling gods. It isn't bad sharing a spot in a pantheon.

    Shoot, winning ONE tour is pretty amazing. To even win a stage, you have to be a tremendous cyclist. There isn't anyone participating in the tour who isn't a superb cyclist.

    Maybe Lance's body will hold up another year and maybe it won't. Maybe some guy will come along and take it instead. It doesn't matter. Lance's place in the history of the Tour de France is already secure.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,411
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    no one has won it 6 times before

  10. #10
    Tour DAY France Random's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Headwind, Indiana
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Regularguy,
    Good post. I have to agree, this is as important to him as the 99, and 00 wins.
    "Random is coming down this finishing straight away like a Grand Prix motorcar!"
    --Phil Ligget (Well Sort of)

  11. #11
    Senior Member Don Cook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Memphis TN
    My Bikes
    Raleigh, Benotto, Schwinn, Trek
    Posts
    816
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like most people, I consider Lance Armstrong to be a role model in numerous ways. The Postal team and Armstrong's performance has been amazing in LeTour. But, after doing some reading last summer on the performance of some of the previous greats, Lance could win two or three more tours, but he still wouldn't be recognized as the greatest: Unless his individual performance stood out separately and above that of the US Postal team's. Meryx, would typically win eight or more stages each time he did the tour (in one tour he won 14 stages). Meryx dominated in virtually every category. Last summer Lance won 1 stage (and was lucky to do it). It's my opinion that Armstrong depends to a much greater degree on his team than did some of the previous greats. Most notably, Meryx.

  12. #12
    Senior Member keithnordstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    290
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hmm i also think that competitive cycling has become much more refined in recent years tho. and everybody has begun to concentrate on one race, i think it's what you need to do to rise above the competitino. when mercks was riding, there were only a few people with the training to hang with him. now everybody's training - and, i suspect, a great many are doping. levels the field a bit.

    i think lance will remain an icon like the others, whether he wins next year or not. and pundits will speculate back and forth about whether he is of the same calibre as merckx, anquetil, hinault, indurain ... but it will all be meaningless. the only way to compare these guys is to somehow take em all out of time and race them against each other.

    that said, i really hope he does win next year.

  13. #13
    Forum Admin lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    n.w. superdrome
    My Bikes
    1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
    Posts
    17,623
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonny B
    . . . But I agree, he has to win in 2004, not to prove he can win 6, not for the money, not for the glory, but simply because he is nothing (to himself) without his yellow jersey.

    . . . If he's not winning the Tour, or preparing himself for another victory, he might as well not be alive.
    After the cycling Lance will still be a cancer survivor, read the books and
    what he says on his LAF website. I think (personal opinion here) that his
    cancer survivorship will be his personal legacy, and his reason to be alive.

    Marty
    Sono più lento di quel che sembra.
    Odio la gente, tutti.

    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.

  14. #14
    Geezer Member Grampy™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    My Bikes
    Airborne, LeMond, Bianchi CX, Volae Century, Redline 925 (fixed) and a Burley Tandem.
    Posts
    1,384
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Phatman
    no one has won it 6 times before
    Ya know what? No one has won it 7 times either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •