Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    MAK
    MAK is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Delaware
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubix, Trek 520, Felt F80, Schwinn Madison, Gary Fisher Nirvana, Nishiki Bravo, Mercian Olympic
    Posts
    903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Does 100 grams per tire make that much of a difference?

    I'm getting ready to change tires and I'll be moving from All Condition Armadillos to either Continental 4000s ot Michelien Krylion Carbons. The Micheliens are about 15 grams lighter and the Contis are 100 grams lighter for each tire. Since 100 grams is "only" about 3 1/2 ounces, is that really that big a deal. I'm a recreational/enthusiast rider and don't race. Your opinions and experiences please.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rotational weight 'weighs' twice as much as non-rotational weight. So those 200 grams is now 400 grams.

  3. #3
    on your left.
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    My Bikes
    Scott SUB 30, Backtrax MTB
    Posts
    1,802
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i don't think at a non-racing level that really matters much.
    might get crap for that, but whatever.

    'gascostalot' made a good point though.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a casual rider too, and struggle with this comparison. i've been thinking about trying to skim weight from my heavy mtb, and tires seem an obvious place to do it. If i could shave 200 - 400 grams, am i really making a significant change to my bike?

  5. #5
    surly old man jgedwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
    Posts
    3,300
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that rotational mass is one factor that the recreational user is MOST likely to notice and appreciate.
    Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
    --------------------------
    SB forever

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gascostalot View Post
    Rotational weight 'weighs' twice as much as non-rotational weight. So those 200 grams is now 400 grams.
    Only under acceleration and even then acceleration effects are so small compared to the major players (drag, gravity, and rolling resistance) as to be insignificant. So the impact of those 200 gms is about 200/80,000 (0.0025).

  7. #7
    I'm made of earth! becnal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Frankfurt, Germany
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Aspen touring/off-road hybrid, and a Bob Yak trailer. Yak very useful for us car-free types that like to buy lots of beer.
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No, it doesn't make a difference at all. Enjoy your ride!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #8
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless you are an elist racer competitive at the very upper levels of racing who does it for 3 weeks at a time like in the Tour de France... shaving a few hundred grams isn't going to do a thing.

  9. #9
    Senior Member biknbrian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    My Bikes
    BiknBrian brand custom 26 inch commuter trekker, Cannondale F600 Single Speeded MTB, some other bikes and parts that could be made into bikes.
    Posts
    349
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Changing from heavy studded winter tires to lightweight XC tires was the only time I've ever changed a part and felt the weight difference. There was such an obvious difference in increased acceleration and sharper handling. Rotational mass matters, espesially in situations with lots of direction and speed changes like mountain biking. Perhaps it makes a bit less difference on the road, but it is still important.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by biknbrian View Post
    Rotational mass matters, ...
    Of course it does. It matters about 0.01%. Some people think that's a lot. Given the higher speeds and accelerations on the road it matters more there than on dirt
    http://www.biketechreview.com/archive/wheel_theory.htm
    .

  11. #11
    surly old man jgedwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
    Posts
    3,300
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I might guess that a recreational rider is going to be dealing with a lot more speed changes than a pro (at least on the road).
    Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
    --------------------------
    SB forever

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jgedwa View Post
    I might guess that a recreational rider is going to be dealing with a lot more speed changes than a pro (at least on the road).
    Have you ever raced? Training rides don't come close to the accelerations in a race. Recreational rides are even further behind.

  13. #13
    surly old man jgedwa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Carlisle, PA
    My Bikes
    IRO Mark V, Karate Monkey half fat, Trek 620 IGH, Cannondale 26/24 MTB, Amp Research B3, and more.
    Posts
    3,300
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nope, I have not, and I suppose my guesswork shows it.

    Can I still salvage my hypothesis that a recreational masher is going to be doing a lot of catch-up on the cranks, and so lighter wheels would be very noticeable?

    If even this is wrong, I will go ride a Varsity up a long hill as punishment.

    jim
    Cross Check Nexus7, IRO Mark V, Trek 620 Nexus7, Karate Monkey half fat, IRO Model 19 fixed, Amp Research B3, Surly 1x1 half fat fixed, and more...
    --------------------------
    SB forever

  14. #14
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    100 grams is about 1/4 pound. Spin 1/4 pound weight at the end of a 14" string and decide for yourself. Personally, tires are the one place I can note minor weight differences. But having said that, 100g is quite nominal compared to tire construction. Same for frame design.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    200
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The weight isn't the only thing when going from Armadillos to Conti 4000s. The sidewalls are much more flexible on the 4000s and the rubber compound is softer/stickier. Not as flat proof as the Armadillos to be sure but a much smoother ride. I think these differences are probably even more noticable than the 100 gram weight savings.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    2,976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CastIron View Post
    100 grams is about 1/4 pound. Spin 1/4 pound weight at the end of a 14" string and decide for yourself.
    Decide what? That there's a centripatal force on the weight from the string? My spokes pretty much take care of that for me. On the other hand, I can spin up a wheel with the pedals using a single finger easily, and that's at an acceleration much faster than any rider can accomplish and includes all the rotational, aero drag and drivetrain losses.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Bill Kapaun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
    My Bikes
    86 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds.
    Posts
    7,364
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a "commuterized" MB in the city with a lot of stop & go. Going from 26x2" to 26x1.5" made a world of difference in acceleration. Part of that was the lower gearing (4%) from the smaller rear diameter. Same as going from a rear 25T cog to a 26T.
    When I made the change, I could only afford 1 tire, so I did the front. I was so impressed, I changed the rear as soon as I could. It really helps me get across an intersection (and out of "harms way") from a stop much quicker.
    Steady "cruising", the effect isn't so noticeable.
    Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 05-27-08 at 03:35 PM.

  18. #18
    Sensible shoes. CastIron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    St. Paul,MN
    My Bikes
    A few.
    Posts
    8,799
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
    Decide what? That there's a centripetal force on the weight from the string? My spokes pretty much take care of that for me. On the other hand, I can spin up a wheel with the pedals using a single finger easily, and that's at an acceleration much faster than any rider can accomplish and includes all the rotational, aero drag and drivetrain losses.
    The spokes don't magically eliminate the mass. It's a very simple way of giving folks some idea of what kind of force we're talking about. I thought it was sufficiently obvious that it wasn't necessary to point out the differences between the two.

    In real terms, when I switch to studded tires in winter (1Kg/ea), the difference is remarkable. It takes about two weeks to adjust in terms of acceleration from lights and up steep hills. 100g in road tires might be noticeable under some conditions, but even then it's likely a function of design.
    Mike
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    It looks silly when you have quotes from other forum members in your signature. Nobody on this forum is that funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by cedricbosch View Post
    Why am I in your signature.

  19. #19
    Senior Member coldfeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by biknbrian View Post
    Changing from heavy studded winter tires to lightweight XC tires was the only time I've ever changed a part and felt the weight difference. There was such an obvious difference in increased acceleration and sharper handling. Rotational mass matters, espesially in situations with lots of direction and speed changes like mountain biking. Perhaps it makes a bit less difference on the road, but it is still important.
    Yes, it does make a difference. It's not just the weight though, churning those lumps of rubber sticking out the surface of the tire ( knobbies ) takes some effort too. The difference between two types of road tire would be less I think.

    A lot of this is subjective, without something like power measuring cranks, it's difficult to get an objective reading. I recently switched from semi studs to Big Apples, they're faster, but not as fast as slicks at high pressure, but I'm having difficulty defining exactly how much slower.
    One thing is definite, they are much more comfortable, they are also faster than other tires would be at the current pressures, ( 35PSI ) I'm going to be playing around with pressures and see what they feel like. To give some idea of the ride difference, one short cut takes me over some hard packed grass tracks, the semi studs had the fender rattling constantly, with the BA's they hardly rattle at all, and when they do it's brief and muted. Like riding a new bike.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Keith99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,806
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by asgelle View Post
    Only under acceleration and even then acceleration effects are so small compared to the major players (drag, gravity, and rolling resistance) as to be insignificant. So the impact of those 200 gms is about 200/80,000 (0.0025).
    Agreed,

    In fact the rolling resistance difference may in fact be a greater benefit than the weight.

    The otehr side is that tires are often the best gms/$ if you do start being a weight weenie.

    On the gross level often lighter, more expensive tires are often of better quality than heavier tires. But these days this is not always true as some manufacturers go for the only look at the weight crowd.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,975
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that weight is the least significant factor.

    The biggest single factor in ride quality and performance is how supple the sidewalls are. Armadillos have ultra stiff sidewalls so I'm thinking either of the other tires are going to ride more smoothly.

    What Armadillos do offer is puncture resistance that is second to none.

  22. #22
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    My Bikes
    litespeed, cannondale
    Posts
    2,795
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well at a multiday ride last year the following happened. A guy I know had a brand new carbon fiber bike that was very light. So Diane took the sucker apart and filled the tubes with rice about 2 lbs of it. The guy did not notice anything different until miles down the road he happended to notice that one of the bar end plugs was a bit loose. He pulled it off and out came rice! With Diane's help later, he managed to get it all out.

    I suspect that very few riders can tell if a bike is a lb lighter or not.

    I did pull off my frame pump, tool pack and water bottles for a short race once. I noticed that the bike did definitely feel lighter. But all that stuff probably weighed over 5 lbs.

  23. #23
    Getting older and slower
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA, USA
    My Bikes
    Beat-up commuter, Chumba XCL for the dirt
    Posts
    102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can only speak from my mountain bike experience. Lighter tires made a huge difference in how nimble the bike felt and how quickly it accelerated. I don't have enough experience with lightweight road tires to make the same claim.

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,936
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Imagination makes a big difference.

  25. #25
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One of the better improvements you can make to a bike is to lose weight on it. But 1/2 lb on a 30 lbs bike is not going to be noticed.

    But lighter tyres will mean less rotational weight-at the extremity of the wheel. Less effort involved in getting the bike up to speed and anything that takes less effort is good in my book.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •