Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Fit question

  1. #1
    Senior Member wez312's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    2010 Motobecane Team Track
    Posts
    161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fit question

    So let's say I am riding a 60cm bike right now, have been for a little while, according to the competitivecyclist.com fitting calculator thing I should be riding about a 49cm. How much of a difference if this going to make?

    Here are my stats from competitivecyclist.

    Measurements
    -------------------------------------------
    Inseam: 29.5
    Trunk: 24
    Forearm: 13
    Arm: 23
    Thigh: 22.5
    Lower Leg: 22
    Sternal Notch: 56
    Total Body Height: 69


    The Competitive Fit (cm)
    -------------------------------------------
    Seat tube range c-c: 48.5 - 49.0
    Seat tube range c-t: 50.0 - 50.5
    Top tube length: 53.4 - 53.8
    Stem Length: 10.2 - 10.8
    BB-Saddle Position: 71.5 - 73.5
    Saddle-Handlebar: 48.7 - 49.3
    Saddle Setback: 0.9 - 1.3

    Thanks for your help!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think your measurements may be off. If you are 5'9" tall and you have been comfortable on a size 60 bike, there is no way your inseam is just 30 inches. A cycling inseam is measured from the floor to your public bone, and more likely your cycling inseam is 33 inches or 34 inches.

    To measure your cycling inseam, you need a book that is about 18 inches long and two inches wide, a tape measure, and a friend. Pull the book up against your crotch until it is uncomfortable. Then push the book an inch higher. Have your friend measure from the top of the book to the floor. Take the measurement about seven times, and the medium measurement is your cycling inseam.

    An easier way to see if a bike fits is simply stand over it. I am 5' 9 1/2 inches tall. When I stand over my size 60 and size 62 bikes, the top tube is pressing slightly against my crotch. But, not to a painful degree. When I ride this bikes, they fit me perfectly.

    For myself, there are three sizes of bikes that work for three types of riding. Using traditional geometry, a size 60 fits me well for urban riding in heavy traffic where I want a higher head position to watch motorists closely.

    For faster riding on road with little or no motor traffic, I would want a bit lower bar position, and would ride a size 57 or size 58. If I were forty years younger, and racing on a closed course, I would select a size 55 or 56, to get the bars ultra-low, and make it easier to ride in an aero position.

    Go to two or three shops, and tell the staff EXACTLY how you plan to use your bike (urban commuting, touring, fast touring, racing) and get their fit suggestions. Which ever shop tries to put you on a bike less than a size 55 is staffed by idiots, and you should leave immediately.

  3. #3
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Crystal River and Hernando, Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2013 Cannondale CAAD 10.
    Posts
    13,695
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wez312 View Post
    So let's say I am riding a 60cm bike right now...

    Inseam: 29.5
    ???

    My inseam is 30" and my bikes are 57cm.
    My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---
    2013 Cannondale CAAD 10 2 "Racing Edition"--The bike shop owner said it's toast. R.I.P.

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  4. #4
    Senior Member deraltekluge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    My Bikes
    Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
    Posts
    1,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by wez312 View Post
    So let's say I am riding a 60cm bike right now, have been for a little while, according to the competitivecyclist.com fitting calculator thing I should be riding about a 49cm. How much of a difference if this going to make?
    The numbers just don't add up. 11 cm difference is huge! On a road bike, Trek calls 60 cm "large" and 50 cm "extra small". You're a bit less than "medium" in height, and with short legs. The 60 cm bike has a stand-over height of 80.3 cm (31.6").

  5. #5
    Hey guyz? Guyz? Wait up!! Siu Blue Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    10,477
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by RonH View Post
    ???

    My inseam is 30" and my bikes are 57cm.
    ???!!! My inseam is 30" and my bike is 50cm.

    You guys are proportioned funny.
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddha
    We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.
    Quote Originally Posted by making View Post
    Please dont outsmart the censor. That is a very expensive censor and every time one of you guys outsmart it it makes someone at the home office feel bad. We dont wanna do that. So dont cleverly disguise bad words.

  6. #6
    Senior Member wez312's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    My Bikes
    2010 Motobecane Team Track
    Posts
    161
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok so I measured inseam again and the most it is is 32"...so apparently that should put me in the range of anywhere from 50cm-56cm? (ideally)

  7. #7
    Senior Member deraltekluge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    My Bikes
    Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX
    Posts
    1,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Siu Blue Wind View Post
    ???!!! My inseam is 30" and my bike is 50cm.

    You guys are proportioned funny.
    Or you are. Or, perhaps more likely, talking about different types of bikes??

    Again, using Trek as examples, their SU 2.0 "urban" bike in "medium" size has a 19.5" (49.5 cm) seat tube and a 77.5 cm stand-over; while their 2.3 "road" bike in "medium" size has a 22" (56 cm) seat tube and a 76.6 cm stand-over.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The best way to find out if a bike fits is to test ride it. Pick a model you are interested in. Stand over the bike with your belt buckle against the back of the stem. Look for a bike where the top tube will lightly brush against the crotch of your jeans when you are standing flat-footed up against the stem.

    Have the store staff adjust the saddle height and bar height, and take the bike for a test ride. If a bike fits you properly, you should have a comfortable fore/aft weight balance. If too much weight is on your hands, the top tube is too long. If very little weight is on your hands, the top tube is too short.

    Bike fit also depends on how and where you ride. If you ride on busy streets, with vehicles on your left and right, you need have your head up where you can watch those vehicles closely. If you plan to get a racing license, and enter short time trials, you will want a bike that puts the bars into an ultra-low position.

    Visit two or three good shops. Take test rides. Ignore internet advice (except the foregoing).

  9. #9
    Hey guyz? Guyz? Wait up!! Siu Blue Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    10,477
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deraltekluge View Post
    Or you are. Or, perhaps more likely, talking about different types of bikes??

    Again, using Trek as examples, their SU 2.0 "urban" bike in "medium" size has a 19.5" (49.5 cm) seat tube and a 77.5 cm stand-over; while their 2.3 "road" bike in "medium" size has a 22" (56 cm) seat tube and a 76.6 cm stand-over.
    I'm 5'5" and have a road bike with compact geometry. I think competitive cyclist is measuring for road bikes because it doesn't match my mtb bike measurements.

    Last edited by Siu Blue Wind; 07-14-08 at 10:40 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddha
    We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.
    Quote Originally Posted by making View Post
    Please dont outsmart the censor. That is a very expensive censor and every time one of you guys outsmart it it makes someone at the home office feel bad. We dont wanna do that. So dont cleverly disguise bad words.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,936
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's got to be something way out of whack with how you're measuring something. It's pretty much impossible to ride a 60 cm bike when a proper fitting one would be 49 cm. For what it's worth, I have a 30 inch "inseam" and I ride 49 cm centre-to-centre, and even that just gives me minimum clearance when in bare feet (just right when in riding shoes, but not tons of clearance).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •