Bike shorts?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,518 Times
in
2,860 Posts
If your voice sounds like Michael Jackson while wearing them, they are too tight.
#27
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
but it's simply not a comfortable or practical way for ordinary people to ride
Telling people that "saddle fit is critical" and then saying with the next breath that "you're not supposed to place your full weight on the saddle" doesn't make any sense...... If bicyclists (by and large) are not placing their full weight on the saddles, then saddle fit should be even less critical, not more.
~
Telling people that "saddle fit is critical" and then saying with the next breath that "you're not supposed to place your full weight on the saddle" doesn't make any sense...... If bicyclists (by and large) are not placing their full weight on the saddles, then saddle fit should be even less critical, not more.
~
It is critical that you have your saddle at the right height so that your leg extension is efficient and won't cause you pain. And it is critical that you have your saddle in the correct foreaft position so that your body is in the right position and your knees especially are in the right place. And it is critical that your saddle is wide enough so that you can perch lightly with your sitbones.
As as for the comment that it is not comfortable or practical ... it IS both comfortable and practical, especially if you've got the core strength to do it. Plopping most of your weight in the saddle is uncomfortable and not practical ... you know all the people complaining of saddle sores. My bet is that a lot of these people don't perch, they plop. And all that extra friction causes sores.
I'm no pro, but I've learned to ride mainly in a perched position (which is very natural and comfortable), and logged a lot of kilometres with only one saddle sore.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#29
Two Wheeled Maniac
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So what about the "double shorts" that have a pair of cycling shorts with the pad inside a more traditional pair of shorts? I like this style for more casual riding, or for times when I might stop off somewhere and don't particularly want to look like a walking billboard for the splendor of my crotch.
The problem is, most of the ones I've seen really have pretty normal outer shorts -- they don't have the cycling panel stitched in and I end up sitting on a big ol' seam anyways -- at which point I might as well wear cycling shorts under a pair of regular shorts. Does anyone know of a set of double shorts (sometimes called mountain biking shorts) that have the panel sewn in?
The problem is, most of the ones I've seen really have pretty normal outer shorts -- they don't have the cycling panel stitched in and I end up sitting on a big ol' seam anyways -- at which point I might as well wear cycling shorts under a pair of regular shorts. Does anyone know of a set of double shorts (sometimes called mountain biking shorts) that have the panel sewn in?
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I'm not sure I'm following you ...
As as for the comment that it is not comfortable or practical ... it IS both comfortable and practical, especially if you've got the core strength to do it. Plopping most of your weight in the saddle is uncomfortable and not practical ... you know all the people complaining of saddle sores. My bet is that a lot of these people don't perch, they plop. And all that extra friction causes sores.
I'm no pro, but I've learned to ride mainly in a perched position (which is very natural and comfortable), and logged a lot of kilometres with only one saddle sore.
As as for the comment that it is not comfortable or practical ... it IS both comfortable and practical, especially if you've got the core strength to do it. Plopping most of your weight in the saddle is uncomfortable and not practical ... you know all the people complaining of saddle sores. My bet is that a lot of these people don't perch, they plop. And all that extra friction causes sores.
I'm no pro, but I've learned to ride mainly in a perched position (which is very natural and comfortable), and logged a lot of kilometres with only one saddle sore.
And normal people don't ride that way.
Okay, here's a classic Amsterdam bicycling page:
https://www.ski-epic.com/amsterdam_bicycles/
As I look, I see that almost all of these bikes have the handlebars set high, and the riders are sitting up pretty straight on their saddles. Many of the bikes have the pedals shifted forward as well (like the Townie does, with the bottom bracket set forward of the seat tube) making it even less likely that they're supporting any of their weight on their hands or feet.
You think they're doing it wrong?
~
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Incorrect. There is no such thing as normal.
Comparing the US to Amsterdam is an insult to Amsterdam. Anyhow, many of the riders I encounter daily ride with their weight distributed between their back and hands. My back flips out when all of my weight is supported by it. Consequently, a bike with a decent saddle to bar drop is comfortable to me.
Comparing the US to Amsterdam is an insult to Amsterdam. Anyhow, many of the riders I encounter daily ride with their weight distributed between their back and hands. My back flips out when all of my weight is supported by it. Consequently, a bike with a decent saddle to bar drop is comfortable to me.
#32
An Army of Fred
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lost South of Nowhere East of Edan On the Waterfront Far from the Madding Crowd (Biloxi, MS)
Posts: 1,003
Bikes: 1992 Specialized Crossroads Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
+1 on the Brooks. Hard as a bowling ball the first time you use it (B.17 in my case, the aged series are already broken in), but given enough saddle time, it will conform to your sit bones and give you a comfortable ride. I also wear bike shorts/tights, mostly because I don't like having loose fabric flapping in the wind.
#33
Senior Member
The problem with this theory is that it is exactly that--only a theory.
Maybe pro racers do it, and I bet a lot of "ordinary folks" do it after their butts get so sore that they have to do it just to keep going, but it's simply not a comfortable or practical way for ordinary people to ride. It's poor salesmanship covering up a poor design--"blaming the customer" as it were.
Maybe pro racers do it, and I bet a lot of "ordinary folks" do it after their butts get so sore that they have to do it just to keep going, but it's simply not a comfortable or practical way for ordinary people to ride. It's poor salesmanship covering up a poor design--"blaming the customer" as it were.
Granted, more casual riders will not likely achieve this form, nor do they need to if they will be riding shorter distances and are not performance oriented.
FWIW: I am fussy about shorts, but not so much about saddles as long; as the saddle isn't too soft or too wide I am usually fine with it. I really like Pearl Izumi Ultrasensor shorts. They have the right amount and placement of padding and are made of materials that wick moisture away nicely and dry quickly. They are also reasonably comfortable even if soaking wet.
I rode coast to coast with the stock saddle that came on my bike and the PI shorts with zero saddle complaints.
#34
Senior Member
Normal people? It depends what you call normal.
Does everyone need to ride the way I describe? No.
Is it a good thing to strive for if you are serious about your riding? I think so.
Is there anything wrong with a more casual approach? No.
Last edited by staehpj1; 11-20-08 at 11:16 AM.
#35
Senior Member
Okay, here's a classic Amsterdam bicycling page:
https://www.ski-epic.com/amsterdam_bicycles/
As I look, I see that almost all of these bikes have the handlebars set high, and the riders are sitting up pretty straight on their saddles. Many of the bikes have the pedals shifted forward as well (like the Townie does, with the bottom bracket set forward of the seat tube) making it even less likely that they're supporting any of their weight on their hands or feet.
You think they're doing it wrong?
~
https://www.ski-epic.com/amsterdam_bicycles/
As I look, I see that almost all of these bikes have the handlebars set high, and the riders are sitting up pretty straight on their saddles. Many of the bikes have the pedals shifted forward as well (like the Townie does, with the bottom bracket set forward of the seat tube) making it even less likely that they're supporting any of their weight on their hands or feet.
You think they're doing it wrong?
~
https://www.elynx.nl/onactivity.php?1...php?Sports@@@@
#36
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
And to think the poor OP asked a simple question about saddle and shorts padding.
#37
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
The problem with this theory is that it is exactly that--only a theory.
Maybe pro racers do it, and I bet a lot of "ordinary folks" do it after their butts get so sore that they have to do it just to keep going, but it's simply not a comfortable or practical way for ordinary people to ride. It's poor salesmanship covering up a poor design--"blaming the customer" as it were.
Telling people that "saddle fit is critical" and then saying with the next breath that "you're not supposed to place your full weight on the saddle" doesn't make any sense...... If bicyclists (by and large) are not placing their full weight on the saddles, then saddle fit should be even less critical, not more.
~
Maybe pro racers do it, and I bet a lot of "ordinary folks" do it after their butts get so sore that they have to do it just to keep going, but it's simply not a comfortable or practical way for ordinary people to ride. It's poor salesmanship covering up a poor design--"blaming the customer" as it were.
Telling people that "saddle fit is critical" and then saying with the next breath that "you're not supposed to place your full weight on the saddle" doesn't make any sense...... If bicyclists (by and large) are not placing their full weight on the saddles, then saddle fit should be even less critical, not more.
~
Too often ordinary Joe wants that racing bike and will not consider anything else; even though he's never going to ride more than 5 miles up and down the greenway. Then he rides less because his butt hurts so he buys that big fat gel saddle. Feels good for a few miles then hurts worse than ever. Bike gets pushed to the back of the garage to collect spider webs. Hopefully he sees the neighbors riding together on their cruisers around the neighborhood and decides to get one for himself but more than likely Joe will just go inside to watch tv and drink beer.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 435
Bikes: Giant OCR1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use a relatively uncushy saddle, Selle Royale Viper, and ride without padding. I've done 70 mile rides no problem. It's all about getting the adjustment right, which took a few weeks of fiddling. I might wear padding on 100 mile + rides, but I'll try it first without.
#39
Senior Member
Some here say you need that bike short chamois for speed. Don't forget distance.. Soft saddles don't substantially reduce friction.. Plus, I get tired of leg openings interfering with leg movement, due to the up and downs of pedaling. Good luck. Go great distances and see if you don't have saddle sores... Good luck with that, one way or the other.
__________________
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
Pray for the Dead and Fight like Hell for the Living
^ Since January 1, 2012
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Merrick, NY
Posts: 822
Bikes: 2009 Mercier Galaxy (custom build), 2008 Argon 18 Mercury
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So what about the "double shorts" that have a pair of cycling shorts with the pad inside a more traditional pair of shorts? I like this style for more casual riding, or for times when I might stop off somewhere and don't particularly want to look like a walking billboard for the splendor of my crotch.
The problem is, most of the ones I've seen really have pretty normal outer shorts -- they don't have the cycling panel stitched in and I end up sitting on a big ol' seam anyways -- at which point I might as well wear cycling shorts under a pair of regular shorts. Does anyone know of a set of double shorts (sometimes called mountain biking shorts) that have the panel sewn in?
The problem is, most of the ones I've seen really have pretty normal outer shorts -- they don't have the cycling panel stitched in and I end up sitting on a big ol' seam anyways -- at which point I might as well wear cycling shorts under a pair of regular shorts. Does anyone know of a set of double shorts (sometimes called mountain biking shorts) that have the panel sewn in?
I exclusively use these for all my riding (30+ miles sometimes) and also spin classes with underwear and have no problems with saddle sores, pain, irritation, or anything else.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 409
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just bought two pairs of Fox Mid-Ranger shorts, which are baggy cycling shorts. So far I've done a 30 mile road ride and the shorts felt good. I did not wear underwear with them, btw.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Merrick, NY
Posts: 822
Bikes: 2009 Mercier Galaxy (custom build), 2008 Argon 18 Mercury
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Cool, they are great I love them. I have the mid rangers (I think) and the base short, need to buy a couple more pairs.
I wear underwear cause the inside seems a bit too fuzzy, like I don't think they intended for you to go commando in them. Aside from having swamp ass from so many layers, I am comfortable with smooth cotton boxer briefs underneath the Fox Racing shorts.
#43
Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why not wearing bike shorts if you don't mind the tight fitting in public ?
No matter how far you ride (of course, not only a few minutes ride !!!), 5 km, 10 km or 20 km ... the padding gives you extra support and comfortable feeling.
Bike shorts are designed for cycling, not for swimming (Tri-suit is different attire), not for sleeping!
WHY NOT WEARING CYCLING SHORTS FOR BIKRING **********?
Don't bother any other people's opinions, Do whatever you feel likely to do (except illegal things or unusual behaviours) .
Go wearing BIKE SHORTS FOR CYCLING .....GO GO GO !!!
Thank you !
No matter how far you ride (of course, not only a few minutes ride !!!), 5 km, 10 km or 20 km ... the padding gives you extra support and comfortable feeling.
Bike shorts are designed for cycling, not for swimming (Tri-suit is different attire), not for sleeping!
WHY NOT WEARING CYCLING SHORTS FOR BIKRING **********?
Don't bother any other people's opinions, Do whatever you feel likely to do (except illegal things or unusual behaviours) .
Go wearing BIKE SHORTS FOR CYCLING .....GO GO GO !!!
Thank you !
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 187
Bikes: Pinarello Veneto
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my bike shorts recently tore, so instead of buying a new one, i'm using what i have (regular shorts). i recently bought an ergonomic seat with a cut-out relief section. instead of sitting on the narrower front part, i just moved to the top part, and it feels great.
i have used a cheap $20 seat, but the seat cushioning had no cut out. it was actually opposite of a cut-out, it buldged in the middle length-wise.
edit: i should point out that i have the seat tilted down (at an angle below horizontal) at the front, so that's why i said i sit at the top of the seat. in other words, i sit at the wider back part of the seat. to do this, i also vertically lowered the seat-post significantly.
the cost of the seat recently purchased was less than the cost of the quality bike shorts that had torn.
i also ride a fixed gear, but have not used this seat arrangement. my weight may shift differently on the seat when riding fixed gear and spinning down hills at high rpms.
i have used a cheap $20 seat, but the seat cushioning had no cut out. it was actually opposite of a cut-out, it buldged in the middle length-wise.
edit: i should point out that i have the seat tilted down (at an angle below horizontal) at the front, so that's why i said i sit at the top of the seat. in other words, i sit at the wider back part of the seat. to do this, i also vertically lowered the seat-post significantly.
the cost of the seat recently purchased was less than the cost of the quality bike shorts that had torn.
i also ride a fixed gear, but have not used this seat arrangement. my weight may shift differently on the seat when riding fixed gear and spinning down hills at high rpms.
Last edited by Lone; 07-24-14 at 06:57 AM.
#45
Senior Member
True, if your bike has a saddle. OTOH, if your bike has a lazyboy chair, the chamois is unnecessary and you SHOULD plunk yourself down, put your feet up, and enjoy the show.
#46
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Someone did a search and replied to a 6 year old thread...
But just to join in on the thread, I wore biking shorts under other shorts for a while, but just decided to go with exposed spandex to keep a little cooler. At 321 pounds, some would not make my decision, but I'm comfortable with it.
But just to join in on the thread, I wore biking shorts under other shorts for a while, but just decided to go with exposed spandex to keep a little cooler. At 321 pounds, some would not make my decision, but I'm comfortable with it.
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#47
Banned
Was Chamois, the skin of a Goat, now easier to wash and dry synthetics are used ..
its the seamless sweat absorbant surface that helps, the Spandex shorts hold it agains your Body.
..so.. saddle friction has the 'Shammy' and the fabric of the shorts to rub against, not your skin..
its the seamless sweat absorbant surface that helps, the Spandex shorts hold it agains your Body.
..so.. saddle friction has the 'Shammy' and the fabric of the shorts to rub against, not your skin..
#49
Senior Member
It's fine when it is another question someone has on the subject and he searched as he should have and read the thread without a complete answer to his question. It's quite different when someone somehow finds the thread and answers the original first post question 6 years later as if that original poster will see it and finally be satisfied that his question was answered after 6 years of waiting like this one was.
#50
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
It's fine when it is another question someone has on the subject and he searched as he should have and read the thread without a complete answer to his question. It's quite different when someone somehow finds the thread and answers the original first post question 6 years later as if that original poster will see it and finally be satisfied that his question was answered after 6 years of waiting like this one was.