Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-08, 06:34 AM   #1
capsicum
Evil Genius
Thread Starter
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Posts: 1,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Effect of a smaller wheel on bumps

So I would like to know how much of an effect wheel size has on ride quality. Ride quality being the time and amplitude of the accelerative forces generated by bumps in the pavement.

Assume a rigid wheels of iso 622 and iso 540, 25mm tires at 100 psi, forward speed of 25kph, 75kg bike and rider, standard 1g of gravity. Rider can be rigidly attached or not, and energy loss can be figured in or not, please specify though.

The obstacles will be a 3mm 6mm 15mm and 30mm step up, 3mm 6mm 15mm and 45mm step down, and a 100mm wide bottomless gap.

If anyone would like to tackle this physics problem then go for it.

Last edited by capsicum; 11-18-08 at 09:27 PM. Reason: more detail
capsicum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-08, 09:04 AM   #2
rbrian
Senior Member
 
rbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Bikes: '07 Brompton S6L; '10 Brompton M6R
Posts: 482
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


rbrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-08, 12:48 PM   #3
StephenH
Uber Goober
 
StephenH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas area, Texas
Bikes:
Posts: 11,235
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
I worked a most marvelous solution on the margin over there ====>>>
But there wasn't enough room to post in the forum.
But I proved that bigger bumps bump you more, and
that bigger wheels bump you less.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
StephenH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-08, 01:07 PM   #4
black_box
Fax Transport Specialist
 
black_box's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chicago burbs
Bikes: '07 fuji cross pro, '10 gary fisher x-caliber
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
when you hit a bump, the bump applies a force directed towards the hub of the wheel. I'm assuming that the more annoying portion of this force is the part thats directed horizontally and in the opposite direction of travel. See the figure of trig terms here (2nd one down on the right):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometry

Imagine that the "wheel" is rolling up the page and encounters the bump. So we have
bump size = Radius - cos(theta) = the green section
and we solve for theta so that
theta = inverse cosine (1 - (bump / Radius))

once you have the angle, the horizontal portion of the force is:
Force * sin(theta)
Lets assume the force is primarily based on the speed, wheel inflation, and weight, and is accordingly a fixed value, its just being applied at a different angle due to the wheel size. I came up with the smaller wheel applying roughly 7% more force than the bigger wheel for each of your "step ups". (between 6.77 and 7.09 percent, smaller value for larger bump)
black_box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-08, 09:25 PM   #5
capsicum
Evil Genius
Thread Starter
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Posts: 1,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
So would it be resonable to assume that 7% more horizantal force would mean the wheel takes about 7% less time to rise from first contact to full bump elevation. Or is it just a different acceleration curve?
capsicum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-08, 02:10 PM   #6
black_box
Fax Transport Specialist
 
black_box's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chicago burbs
Bikes: '07 fuji cross pro, '10 gary fisher x-caliber
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
no, because thats an instantaneous force when it first hits the bump. It will be reduced as soon as the wheel starts moving up and over the bump (i think).

there are more difficulties to consider, its not really an easy problem from what i can tell. The bigger wheel receives less force in the reverse direction. It also spreads out the impact over a slightly longer travel path, which means less force required to do the same amount of work. I think i'll get back to my day job
black_box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-08, 02:31 PM   #7
capsicum
Evil Genius
Thread Starter
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Posts: 1,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes. Now who can say by how much? Anyone have the acceleration sensors and high speed cameras to do this the empirical way?
capsicum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-08, 07:08 PM   #8
Velo Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Bikes:
Posts: 3,802
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Somebody else can do the math, but as a practical matter, you're not going to notice much difference over bumps. Grant Petersen at Rivendell is the most recent champion of 650B wheels, and I got wheels from him to convert an old Bridgestone my wife didn't use much because the widest 700s it could fit were 25mm. The smaller wheels gave more clearance for fatter tires, and it transformed a bike she didn't like at all to one she loves. It's 12cm too small for me, so I can't really get a good feel for specifics, but she's an experienced rider, and she says it's more comfortable, more stable and no slower. whetever it loses, theoretically, in hitting obstacles seems to be more than countered by the increased volume of the tires.
You can read Grant's pitch at www.rivbike.com
Velo Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-08, 02:05 AM   #9
capsicum
Evil Genius
Thread Starter
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Posts: 1,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am more interested in comfort than efficiency but either way it must be apples to apples (same size tires and pressures, say 25mm 100psi) ISO 584 [650b] with a larger tire is close to the same dia. and has more cushion. I selected 3mm bumps to simulate a rough chip seal, 30-45mm big bumps for pavement edges, stuff in between for graphing. 100mm wide gap for a small potholes, cattle grate, or storm drain.
capsicum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-08, 03:47 PM   #10
atbman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Bikes:
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Small or big, wheels have no effect on bumps
atbman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-08, 03:08 AM   #11
capsicum
Evil Genius
Thread Starter
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).
Posts: 1,529
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by atbman View Post
Small or big, wheels have no effect on bumps
These wheels do... 175 short tons
capsicum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.