Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    ******** modmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    My Bikes
    vintage schwinn speedster, Soma Rush, Centurion Accordo fixie convertion, lotus eclair conversion, univega sport tandem
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    height advantages and disadvantages?

    i was wondering if there were any advantages or disadvantages when it comes to leg length and cycling. are there particular things that come into play for long legged riders and short legged riders (ex. crank length, gear ratios).

  2. #2
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think it matters much in cycling as one can fine tune the equipment to match his/her physique. In many other sports, yes, size does matter.

    George
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  3. #3
    Devilmaycare Cycling Fool Allister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Wynnum, Australia
    My Bikes
    1998 Cannondale F700
    Posts
    3,819
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tall riders can turn longer cranks which is a slight advantage, but we're also heavier and need bigger, heavier bikes (I'm 6'3"). Each body type has it's own advantages and disadvatages.
    If we learn from our mistakes, I must be a goddamn genius.

  4. #4
    ******** modmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    My Bikes
    vintage schwinn speedster, Soma Rush, Centurion Accordo fixie convertion, lotus eclair conversion, univega sport tandem
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah, i thought that there would be difference between the two. seems like there would be different muscle development too? or am i wrong about that?
    i was kind of looking at it like with cars, stroke length.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,073
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When big guys turn big cranks, they are usually more comfortable at a lower cadence, and a higher cog-ratio. The angular speed may be the same as a smaller rider (or slower), but you are doing more work turing a large crank.
    You really have to factor crank length into your overall gearing for a comparison. I dont think there is much point comparing a big guy on big cranks to a small guy on small cranks. Each will spin at their comfortable cadence, in a gear of their chosing.

  6. #6
    orange claw hammer Bryan T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    cloud nine
    My Bikes
    '00 IF Club Racer
    Posts
    202
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    At 6'8" and (I think) 200 pounds, my disadvantages are having to be careful pedaling when cornering (I've tapped the pavement a couple of times), and having a bit more wind resistance than not-as-tall people on a fast downhill.
    But: I can really climb on long hills.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •