Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Advice - Trek 7200 fx or Trek 7300

    Hello, I am looking to buy a bike, I haven't owned a bike since a 1970's 10 speed. I will be riding on pavement, gravel and some state park bike trails. I don't know how much I will be riding as I have some knee and back problems, so I don't want to spend alot of money until I see how it goes.

    Here is my question, I am looking at the following bike:

    1) 2001 Trek 7200 fx - $100

    2) 2004 Trek 7300 - $200

    Both of the used bikes are like new

    or a new entry level bike - $300 - $350

    Which option is best, if you suggest a new bike - which one would you recommend?

    Thanks for your help!

  2. #2
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Neither is much of an off-road bike for trails. They're both pavement/bike trails/road bikes, with the FX being more the road bike than the 7300.

    The 7000 series hybrids (not the fx'es) are a "hybrid" but in reality they don't do either very well. They're a mediocre road bike and a poor trails bike in stock form. That said, if you just want to go putz around on a bike they're ok.

    -R

  3. #3
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Trek FX - series are very nice bikes. And they are hybrids. I have a 7.5 FX which I've upgraded. But not to make it into a road-bike. Rather into the best hybrid a hybrid can be. They are fast and can navigate tame trails in the woods and hills - but they are NOT mountain-bikes. What are they really? Put it this way: These are bikes that you'd want to have in the Old West. Before roads were paved, but were still roads. And that's like a good percentage of what our roads are like here in Vermont.
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  4. #4
    Team Water Andy_K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Jake, 2008 Kona Major Jake, 2013 Kona Jake the Snake, 1999 Kona Muni Mula, 2012 Ridley Excalibur, 2008 Surly Long Haul Trucker
    Posts
    7,018
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Everything depends on which bike fits you. If both fit you, given your situation, I would go with the 7200 FX. Ride it for a few months. If you love biking, you can sell it for about the same price you bought it and get something snazzier.

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the input - what about a 2007 Raleigh Mojave 2.0?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yup, what Andy said. I just bought a 7.3FX used. It had about 10 miles on it, literally, for $450 with a disc brake upgrade.

    I think another applicable term for "hybrid" bikes is exercise bikes. It's definitely not a mountain bike but it can go very well in the <30 mile range, comfortably; which makes it a perfect exercise bike. I'm very happy with mine, riding in the 10-30 mile range very effectively. Solid, reasonably fast bike.

    The 7000 series are more upright sitting by several inches. They're more of a "comfort" bike. The FX series are a bit more leaned over. If your intent is <10 miles, go for the 7000 series. If 10-30, go for the FX. If >30 miles, you need another bike.

  7. #7
    Senior Member KungPaoSchwinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ms/Ca, USA,Earth.
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek FX 7.3 ( pimp moment )
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The man has knee and back problem,the up right position of the 7300 series is better ,technically speaking of course.Yeah, them FX series bike kick butts,i love mine and it's bone stock.
    2009 Trek FX 7.3

  8. #8
    Senior Member edp773's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Illinios
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Cypress, 2006 Trek 7.3 FX, 2007 Gary Fisher Wahoo
    Posts
    1,143
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KungPaoSchwinn View Post
    The man has knee and back problem,the up right position of the 7300 series is better ,technically speaking of course.Yeah, them FX series bike kick butts,i love mine and it's bone stock.
    +1 With back problems I would suggest the 7300. For knee problems I would suggest proper bike fit and using lower gears.
    Born Again Bicyclist! I found my Faith.

    Giant Cypress, GF Wahoo, Trek 7.3FX, Schwinn Sprint

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne in Australia
    My Bikes
    Old 12-speed commuter, When I earn enough I'll get a fixed KHS flite 100
    Posts
    568
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    7.2fx here. The best bike I've ever owned. I'd be wary of having front suspension, simply cause its extra weight and you might need it. Concentrate on which bike fits you better as well. After the shiny paint wears off, and the drive-train starts rattling, the only thing that will differentiate one bike from another is which is more comfortable to sit and pedal on.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •