Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Quick Question about Surly Steamroller and BB height

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Quick Question about Surly Steamroller and BB height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-09, 11:43 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quick Question about Surly Steamroller and BB height

I've been looking at getting a surly steamroller for my next bike project and have come across a good deal on some crank arms. However, I am having a dilemma. The size steamroller I would need is a 49 cm, but the crank arms that I am looking/leaning to get are 167.5 mm in length. Would this put me at risk for pedal striking? I plan on exclusively riding this on city streets, with the rare possible of it seeing the track.

Are these size crank arms okay to get? Or should I stick to looking for ones that are 165 mm in length?

Thanks for any advice.

Carla
carlaftw is offline  
Old 04-21-09, 07:55 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fair warning: I ride a 64, so I'm not an expert on small frames. But my wife's only 5'1", and she's never hit the 170mm cranks I put on her bike (I had a set in the garage when I built it). The difference between 165 and 167.5 is only a tenth of an inch; I can't imagine it would cause a significant problem. Pedaling through sharp turns isn't a very good idea anyway, and i have the scars to prove it.
Velo Dog is offline  
Old 04-21-09, 07:28 PM
  #3  
surfrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I've got a 56cm Steamroller with 165 crank arms, and my feet WILL strike the front wheel if I'm trying to trackstand (I say try, because I'm a failure at it ). However, while riding, I tend to lean into corners, and typically don't pedal while going around corners really slowly, so its never been a problem. The bigger issue for me is the Steamroller's more compact geometry compared to my Trek hybrid bike; changing between them can be an 'experience'. No problem with toe strike on the hybrid.

Last edited by surfrider; 04-21-09 at 07:30 PM. Reason: no such thing as 165cm crank arms!
 
Old 04-21-09, 08:41 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by surfrider
I've got a 56cm Steamroller with 165 crank arms, and my feet WILL strike the front wheel if I'm trying to trackstand .
Just FYI, this is very common. I can touch the front wheel with my feet on four of my five bikes if I try--but it's never once happened while I was riding. It used to be called "toe clip overlap," but I don't know what it's called now. In any case, it's not an issue. I rode my Trek 12,000 miles before somebody asked me if I could touch the wheel with my toes and I found out I could.
Velo Dog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.