Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Can someone explain the difference between these two bikes?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Can someone explain the difference between these two bikes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-09, 03:41 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Can someone explain the difference between these two bikes?

I don't really know anything about bikes, went to a few shops today to get an idea.

The staff recommended this:

https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-GB/...in/2450/32675/

Our requirements were - not too expensive (these come at £200), for general leisure use (with a 7 year old coming along, we're never going to be doing 30 miles on road) on gravel paths, forest tracks, etc. Nothing particularly demanding.

I had a look at the Giant website. I couldn't particularly see anything in the 'Sport' Mountain Bike range (https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-GB/bikes/mountain/) to persuade me to upgrade (the Boulder is £250 and the Rincon is £300).

But I'm curious about the Sedona bicycle. This comes in at £250, and is classed by Giant as 'Comfort'

Specs here:
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-GB/...le/2474/32880/

What are the practical differences between the two?
thelawnet is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 04:12 PM
  #2  
The Improbable Bulk
 
Little Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I have a 2003 Sedona DX (US Version)

The Sedona will probably have you riding a little more upright, and have a little more adjustability due to the adjustable stem.

The differences are basically that the Sedona is oriented to riding on paved roads and smooth paths with an occasional relatively easy trip off road. The Rock is oriented toward riding off road. You would find the Sedona would ride a little more efficiently on the smooth surfaces, but would not perform as well in the rough stuff.

Another option, if you are really oriented toward the road/smooth path, to take it even one more step, is the Cypress, which is basically the same as the Sedona with smoother tires in the 700c size. Slightly less capable for off road, but slightly more efficient on the smooth path.
Little Darwin is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 04:40 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't think we want efficient really, because we need to take the 7-year-old into account.

I assume a mountain bike will 'go' on any surface, just not very fast?

We're really not planning to ride on-road.
thelawnet is offline  
Old 05-27-09, 05:38 PM
  #4  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by thelawnet
I don't think we want efficient really, because we need to take the 7-year-old into account.

I assume a mountain bike will 'go' on any surface, just not very fast?

We're really not planning to ride on-road.
If you're going to be tooling around offroad with a kid and not going very fast, the giant classified as "comfort" is probably going to be a fine choice. If you plan on going a little faster then get the giant rock.

The sedona is really a upright, slow cruising type bike. The rock is almost performance hybrid, but not quite. The 'sport' range is for serious offroading, which is not what you plan on doing.
operator is offline  
Old 05-28-09, 10:56 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
badmother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,720
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 317 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by thelawnet
for general leisure use (with a 7 year old coming along, we're never going to be doing 30 miles on road) on gravel paths, forest tracks, etc. Nothing particularly demanding.
Just remember that three yrs fom now your seven yr old is going to be ten, and then twelve.. They can be quite demanding.
badmother is offline  
Old 05-28-09, 12:07 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So I bought the Giant Sedona. Wife likes this one:

https://www.2x2worldwide.com/LR2008/saqqara.html#

Any thoughts? Better bike? Worse? She likes the styling and mudguards. Any other similar bikes to suggest?
thelawnet is offline  
Old 05-28-09, 12:51 PM
  #7  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,498

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7346 Post(s)
Liked 2,452 Times in 1,430 Posts
Mudguards are very nice to have. It's amazing how few people use them, at least here in the US (where we call them fenders).

The Saqqara looks nice, though having a ladies style frame offers no real advantage unless she truly will ride wearing a skirt.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 05-30-09, 04:42 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think we will buy a 14" men's 2007 model Sedona DX for her. It's 40% cheaper than a 2009 model and the components seem to be pretty similar.
thelawnet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.