Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Stand over clearance should be measured from top tube to...

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • "family jewels", "the boys", "kugel sack" etc.

    7 43.75%
  • pubic bone

    7 43.75%
  • some other way to measure standover

    2 12.50%
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Stand over height: measure up to the jewels or pubic bone?

    Lots of threads on stand over height but no conclusive reasoning whether to measure it up to the family jewels or the pubic bone. Family jewels makes sense because as pointed out before, they are possibly the first to contact the top frame should you need to dismount quickly. That's not always the case (if the jewels are out of the way by luck) but I wouldn't chance it. Do the pubic bone supporters have a better reason beside it being easier to measure?

    I am 5' 9 1/2" with a Fuji Absolute 2.0 19" hybrid bike. Sure, the 17" was probably my best fit but it was not on the LBS' floor and I got a really good deal with the 19". When I stand over the bike without shoes, my jewels brush over the top tube. When I put on sneakers, there's probably some but very little clearance (~.5 - 1 cm) between the top tube and the jewels. I can ride, control, straddle over, mount and dismount the bike comfortably. Now if I lift the bike so that it presses against the pubic bone (and not too hard btw) - then there is 1.5" clearance without shoes. Therefore, the 19" fits me fine if we go by PB method whereas it does not if we go by jewels measurement. I'm thinking of getting shoes with 1" sole thickness to add more clearance.

    I ride for fitness in state parks / touring. There's always the fear that I may for that one time slip & fall or maybe crash into someone. In this case I may fall of the seat with bent legs onto the top tube. Even though it may happen rarely - that rare occurrence may be a very traumatic experience.

    So my questions are: (1) PB or jewels to measure stand over and why do you say? (2) Does the 19" sound too big for me? (3) What are the typical sole thickness for bikng shoes? Is 1" too much?

    Thank you all for your precious time.
    Last edited by common man; 08-10-09 at 07:31 AM.

  2. #2
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    Road & Hybrid
    Posts
    5,571
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As high as you can insert something between your legs, without meeting an ommovable obstruction. (No insertions)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so you say to measure up to pubic bone. the "jewels" are movable whereas the pubic bone is not. ok - thanks. now why do you say this when we know that the "jewels" may possibly be the first to contact? i'm not questioning your answer but just want to know the reasoning. if (i am) obsessing too much - i apologize.

  4. #4
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    Road & Hybrid
    Posts
    5,571
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just like you would be sit/straddling a pipe.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Nermal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Farmington, NM
    My Bikes
    Giant Cypress SX
    Posts
    1,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like Wanderer says, bare heel to naked crotch. Measure to any of the dangling bits you want, but you will be getting a very small bike if you do - probably.

    I'm not sure why you are considering 1" heels to add to your standover height. You don't really pedal with your heels, do you?
    Some people are like a Slinky ... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs.

  6. #6
    Senior Member badmother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This has been discussed a lot, especially since the measuring of the seattube is a bit outdated since most modern frames has got a sloping toptube.

    Also your total bodylenght is not the only interesting thing, your inseam is more important for the standover height.

    I`ve seen peopel saying that the effective toptube lenght on the bike is the most important when deciding if the bike fits.

    Also there is info that peopel used to ride much bigger frames "in the old days", and still a lot of peopel like bigger frames better, especially to get the bars higher up.

    You can do a search (use the search option on the top of the page) and read earlyer postings on the topic.

    How often do you stand with one foot on the ground like that? If nothing hurts there is no problem with contact.

    Forget the heels, use shoes that is right for you.

    Edit: Here is a link, you can find other pages and they might have slightly different opinions on some details.

    http://www.rivbike.com/article/bike_...g_a_frame_size

    Look to the right down the page, you`ll find more about bike fittng.
    Last edited by badmother; 08-09-09 at 09:26 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll probably sound like a wise-guy (who didn't answer your question directly) but the definitions ain't going to matter if you hit "right", no matter how comfortable/confident you feel/think about the situation. I remember as a teenager riding a bike with "negative" standover clearance (I didn't know anything about checking for standover clearance either), when I got off the bike I leaned (lopsided-like) one leg down first and avoided straddling the top tube. I never had a top-tube "incident" with that bike, but I realize now that that was not an ideal situation.

    I'm guessing about 3 inches below the pubic bone is the clearance I'm getting (I just checked and was surprised it was that much), that includes my shoes with about an 1 inch-thick sole (I ride regular flatform pedals). I'm going to say measure via pubic bone because that's where the "dead-end" contact would equal pain (seems like the "squishy" parts could move a lot to escape injury).

    My original point was that there is a bar between your legs and you might hit it wrong and cause some pain (no matter what the "official" ideal clearance is) but (since you have at least some clearance) I think your fear is a bit overblown and you are relatively safe from a top-tube catastrophe.

  8. #8
    I have senior moments... bikinfool's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Woodside, CA
    My Bikes
    Many
    Posts
    2,153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Where's the "who cares" option in the poll? Didn't you ever ride dad's bike when you were a kid? Do you still have functionality? What a ridiculous fear sell this whole top tube clearance thing is. Maybe a better poll would be along the lines of how many of you have actually lost your balls due to top tube contact?

    Get a frame that fits, if you're stupid enough to land on the top tube 1" ain't gonna make a difference...
    suum quique
    Mountain bikes: Santa Cruz Hecklers (99, 02, 07), Santa Cruz Nomad, Moots YBB, Trek OCLV Pro Issue, American Breezer
    Road bikes: TST, Trek 2300 (Carbon/Alum)

  9. #9
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You mean after I shaved my legs - I wasn't supposed to get castrated??
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  10. #10
    Senior Member badmother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panthers007 View Post
    You mean after I shaved my legs - I wasn't supposed to get castrated??
    Have you visited the Road Forums again?
    Last edited by badmother; 08-10-09 at 05:38 AM.
    °Empty drums make a lot of noice... (Old Hungarian proverb).

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    14,274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WTF does the road forum have to do with anything?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    poor wording on my part - i meant 1" thick soles (not heels rofl). i edited that. thanks for the replies.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    All I know is that the boys had better be clear.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have an older bike with a fairly level top tube (91 Trek 750 Multitrack hybrid). Used to be 5' 10", but am shrinking, so I'm probably same height as you. My Trek is also a 19. I do have a shorter inseam than a lot of guys our height (or smaller) at 29". I have a moderate amount of seat tube showing, ~5". It seems to work well for me so far.

    My concern is Trek seems to have only 20" and 17.5". Twenty is MAYBE too big, but I'm curious about going to 17.5".

    Seems to me that a LOT has to do with seat post height, especially given that many top tubes are angled these days. Nobody ever seems to mention seat tube exposed, but I think that plays just as much a role as other measurements...

    No, I'm not in the immediate market for a new bike, but I sure lust after one.

  15. #15
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikinfool View Post
    Where's the "who cares" option in the poll? Didn't you ever ride dad's bike when you were a kid? Do you still have functionality? What a ridiculous fear sell this whole top tube clearance thing is. :

    ..
    Hate to say it but standover height is not the main criteria for a bike fitting. I have bikes that I cannot touch the ground unless I lean the bike over. Even on some Compact frames I struggle. And once I am on the saddle- I cannot touch the ground on any of my bikes, The feet are still a couple of inches short. But I do have the Crank to Crutch height right- the reach is perfect and The bikes fit.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  16. #16
    Senior Member badmother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,941
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DataJunkie View Post
    WTF does the road forum have to do with anything?
    Just trying to make a joke about the shaved legs.

    Edit: Short legs-need suggestions-Touring/non-paved
    Last edited by badmother; 08-10-09 at 12:38 PM.
    °Empty drums make a lot of noice... (Old Hungarian proverb).

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
    Posts
    3,424
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's a concern for me and the boys.If your not worried about singing soprano someday,standover height don't matter.

    In the old days,being able to lift the bike about an inch or so was the rule around these parts.
    Everything should be as simple as possible...But not more so.---Albert Einstein

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •