Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27
  1. #1
    Senior Member mustang1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    My Bikes
    2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    "NO!" to (govt led) bike registration

    They'll tell you it "only cost (small small amount)".
    Yeah, for now.

    They'll tell you we need a revenue stream to invest in bike paths.
    Yeah right, and who pays the revenue stream for pedestrians? What, you gotta pay a tax to walk on the sidewalk?

    Dunno about you, but I've been riding just fine in my younger years when we didn't have bike paths. What's the big deal now? More traffic? Yeah, but more traffic means it's moving slower too. What about dedicated bus lanes that the MOTORIST has to pay for (in London for example, we've had many two lanes roads being blocked by one lane, dedicated to bus lanes). Who pays for that? The car owner is paying for the entire length of road, even though half of it is dediated to buses. They should reduce our damn taxes and obtain additional money from the bus companies (they probably are in some format).

    They'll tell you some dumb excuse after another. The fact is, they're attempting to find more revenue streams. More ways to tax us, and I dont like it. And neither do you. So whenever this kinda stuff comes up, just say NO ok? We dont want to be monitored all the time. Bikes cause no pollution, no traffic, no wear on the tarmac. It IS however a form of freedom, and those in control do not like us to have freedom.

    The only thing they have left is "we wanna stop cyclists from breaking the law" by which they mean "we dont want you running red lights". If that's all there is to it, then stop running red lights. I agree when it's safe to do so (no police, no peds, no cars), then go ahead. Whenever I pass a ghost cycle (the whites ones where a cyclist has died), it's always at a junction/intersection. Just be careful there. Dont do dumb things that'll attract risk of injury or problems with the cops, and they wont have any more excuses to tax us. It may not stop them from taxing us, but at least they'll be doing it without a reason.

    JUST. SAY. NO.
    Last edited by mustang1; 08-12-09 at 09:22 AM. Reason: re-formatted paragraphs
    1 cx bike, commuter (light off road), 2 road bikes (sportives and fair weather commuter), 1 mtb (off road fun and antics)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    My Bikes
    Cervelo R3 (Force)
    Posts
    2,458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ew. i haven't bought a California bicycle license though its "required" for the city of Davis. its two stickers with numbers on them but i'd rather not have somethign that silly on the seat tube of my Cervelo...
    Cervelo Soloist Team (Rival)
    Cervelo R3 (Force)

  3. #3
    Senior Member kwrides's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    My Bikes
    2007 Orbea Onix, 2007 Windsor The Hour, 2008 Kona Jake
    Posts
    3,199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dewaday View Post
    I'm 50 years old. My parents find cycling 6-8 hours completely incomprehensible and self indulgent. Of course they're right, but I continue to ignore them as a form of rebellion.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Scorer75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll never register my bikes...EVER

  5. #5
    Sua Ku rollin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hot as hell, Singapore
    My Bikes
    Trek 5200, BMC SLC01, BMC SSX, Specialized FSR, Holdsworth Criterium
    Posts
    5,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would pay if there were real infrastructural changes.

    The downside is that taxing cycling would discourage people from riding which would be a massive set back.

    I also happen to agree with bus lanes.

    By the way OP, where do you think "sidewalks" come from? someone somewhere is paying a tax for them.

  6. #6
    Go Buckeyes! MissKristen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio. Powell.
    My Bikes
    Fuji road bike and a totally crap MTB that I use(d) for gnarly trail riding.
    Posts
    548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm moving this to Hybrids & General Cycling as it doesn't strictly pertain to Road Cycling only... thanks
    No matter what happens now
    You shouldn't be afraid
    Because I know today has been the most perfect day I've ever seen.

    - Videotape

    R A D I O H E A D

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NYC
    My Bikes
    Felt AR1, Cervelo S2
    Posts
    2,760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i WOULD be in favor of bike registration for NYC restaurants, though.

    they are the ones who buy, and therefore create a market for, stolen bikes in NYC.
    as a result, you can't lock up a nice bike anywhere, and lock up any bike, you need to carry 20lbs of locks and chains.

    registration required
    receipt required for registration
    $300 fine for biking without registration
    work with LBS to set up bulk deals and maintenance programs...make it cheaper to buy than to steal.

  8. #8
    Senior Member mustang1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    My Bikes
    2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rollin View Post
    I would pay if there were real infrastructural changes.

    The downside is that taxing cycling would discourage people from riding which would be a massive set back.

    I also happen to agree with bus lanes.

    By the way OP, where do you think "sidewalks" come from? someone somewhere is paying a tax for them.
    Yup, but there isn't a separate Pedestrians Tax. Similarly, there shouldn't be a separate Cycle Tax.
    1 cx bike, commuter (light off road), 2 road bikes (sportives and fair weather commuter), 1 mtb (off road fun and antics)

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by rollin View Post
    By the way OP, where do you think "sidewalks" come from? someone somewhere is paying a tax for them.
    I don't know how it works where you're from, but in Austin and San Antonio, sidewalks are payed for by the property owner or the developer of the land. Even after the city takes over ownership and maintenance of the streets, the sidewalks are still the responsibility of the land owner. Sidewalks are rarely payed for by taxes.

  10. #10
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    20,624
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mustang1 View Post
    They'll tell you it "only cost (small small amount)".
    Yeah, for now.

    They'll tell you we need a revenue stream to invest in bike paths.
    Yeah right, and who pays the revenue stream for pedestrians? What, you gotta pay a tax to walk on the sidewalk?

    Dunno about you, but I've been riding just fine in my younger years when we didn't have bike paths. What's the big deal now? More traffic? Yeah, but more traffic means it's moving slower too. What about dedicated bus lanes that the MOTORIST has to pay for (in London for example, we've had many two lanes roads being blocked by one lane, dedicated to bus lanes). Who pays for that? The car owner is paying for the entire length of road, even though half of it is dediated to buses. They should reduce our damn taxes and obtain additional money from the bus companies (they probably are in some format).

    They'll tell you some dumb excuse after another. The fact is, they're attempting to find more revenue streams. More ways to tax us, and I dont like it. And neither do you. So whenever this kinda stuff comes up, just say NO ok? We dont want to be monitored all the time. Bikes cause no pollution, no traffic, no wear on the tarmac. It IS however a form of freedom, and those in control do not like us to have freedom.

    The only thing they have left is "we wanna stop cyclists from breaking the law" by which they mean "we dont want you running red lights". If that's all there is to it, then stop running red lights. I agree when it's safe to do so (no police, no peds, no cars), then go ahead. Whenever I pass a ghost cycle (the whites ones where a cyclist has died), it's always at a junction/intersection. Just be careful there. Dont do dumb things that'll attract risk of injury or problems with the cops, and they wont have any more excuses to tax us. It may not stop them from taxing us, but at least they'll be doing it without a reason.

    JUST. SAY. NO.

    Who is this "They" you are ranting about? A handul of cranks and crackpots posting on blogs or writing letters to the editor?

  11. #11
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    Who is this "They" you are ranting about? A handul of cranks and crackpots posting on blogs or writing letters to the editor?
    Thanks... That same question was the first thing in my mind. I was looking for a reference or a link to some article.

  12. #12
    I am Joe's lactic acid. Big M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    My Bikes
    2008 Windsor Cyclo, and some spares.
    Posts
    370
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CCrew View Post
    Thanks... That same question was the first thing in my mind. I was looking for a reference or a link to some article.
    Me too.
    I was looking for a story about some newsworthy legislation being proposed somewhere, but I guess this is just some random rant.
    If there was a problem, yo, Ill solve it
    Check out the hook while my dj revolves it

  13. #13
    rebmeM roineS JanMM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    My Bikes
    RANS V3, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
    Posts
    11,851
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Beware of "they"!
    RANS V3 (steel), RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

  14. #14
    Older than dirt CCrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Winchester, VA
    My Bikes
    Too darn many.. latest count is 11
    Posts
    5,345
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok. I'v got my tinfoil hat on. Time for the OP to explain

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,441
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm aware that there are several commercial outfits that will take the information on your bike and store it. Not a bad idea...
    As a police officer, I'm well aware of the problem of bike theft and how difficult it can be to prosecute the thieves. I would imagine that of the dozens (maybe hundreds) of reports I've personally taken, only a tiny fraction of the victims could give me the serial number of the bike.
    Worse, when we enter the serial number into NCIC (National Crime Information Center), they only take the serial number. The other descriptive information on the bike is not entered.
    So, if we get a positive "hit" on a recovered bike, we have to bear in mind that bicycle manufacturers use no organized or industry-wide numbering system like auto makers do.
    So, it's entirely possible to get exactly the same serial number on several different bikes...

    A lot of bike thefts qualify as felonies these days; in most states it's over 500.00.

  16. #16
    Pro Paper Plane Pilot wunderkind's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,624
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fight the "They"!!!!
    Vancouver Modern Portrait Photography

    Zenfolio.com membership discount code: UBV-HJY-SCY

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,194
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gov'ts will quickly regret this move. All of sudden, they'll have a "tax" paying constituency wanting more bike trails, improvements thereto and bike lanes with law enforcement against harassing/errant drivers. Bad idea. bk

  18. #18
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bikewer View Post
    I'm aware that there are several commercial outfits that will take the information on your bike and store it. Not a bad idea...
    A

    What concerns me with these outfits is: You're giving information on your (very expensive) bike to a computer somewhere. How secure is this information? What will prevent a determined thief, who has a customer wanting a 1969 Red Cinelli, from finding your 1969 Red Cinelli at your address?
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  19. #19
    Senior Member Timber_8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South East Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,090
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panthers007 View Post
    What concerns me with these outfits is: You're giving information on your (very expensive) bike to a computer somewhere. How secure is this information? What will prevent a determined thief, who has a customer wanting a 1969 Red Cinelli, from finding your 1969 Red Cinelli at your address?
    I can tell you here in Massachusetts The bicycle infrastructure is very advanced & improving constantly. Most lights have Bicycle sensitive pressure pads or trip lines. Bicycle routes are clearly marked in the streets. Boston is constantly promoting Bicycle paths and routing & in general is very supportive of Bicycle commuting. I also have to say that the community for the most part has been very friendly to Bicycle riders. Bike paths are expensive but there is also a trade off. for every bike commuter there is less ware & tear on roads, less congestion, less health care related expense. It is a win win. I don't believe we need another tax to discourage people from Bikeing.
    Hybrid) Trek FX 7.2
    Road bike) Specialized Secteur Elite
    Mountain bike) Marin Bobcat trail
    Founding member of the Hybrid Forum
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I have thoughts
    Charlie

  20. #20
    This steel horse I ride Skones MickLoud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Warshington DC
    My Bikes
    1980something Schwinn Tempo
    Posts
    187
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Inertianinja View Post
    receipt required for registration
    My road bike is older than me and my uncle who purchased it 3,000 miles away has been dead for 10 years. Where am I going to get a receipt for it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Inertianinja View Post
    $300 fine for biking without registration
    Same thing. Are those of us who are unable to provide a receipt to be expected to pay a $300 fine every time we ride?

    Quote Originally Posted by Inertianinja View Post
    work with LBS to set up bulk deals and maintenance programs...make it cheaper to buy than to steal.
    I can buy a set of bolt-cutters for ~$20. No LBS could stay in business by selling bikes for $19.99.
    Last edited by Skones MickLoud; 08-14-09 at 04:21 AM.

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    998
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't like bicycle registration. Already, there are services like the National Bike Registry to register frame serial numbers with tracking services, so adding another is pointless. The disadvantages are many for mandatory registration:
    • It is another database for blackhats to compromise and sell to thieves for targeted thefts, or in extreme cases, holdups.
    • A registration database likely would have no printed privacy policy or regulations on use. Who gets to sift through the information and correlate it with other database entries for more invasive uses? Would insurance companies get another excuse jack up premiums on road bike owners because they go faster than those with beach cruisers, and thus more chance of a higher speed collision?
    • It would be another lowbrow tool for municipalities to get money. Yes, this is a slippery slope argument, but it wouldn't be far-fetched for bike hostile cities to start charging a registration fee (likely the same as motorized vehicles) as another revenue stream. I can see the argument now, "if it is a vehicle and has vehicle rights on the road, it pays the vehicle registration fee." Perhaps they might add some "inspections" for another hit of $50 a year. Of course, tracking bikes allows parking tickets to be issued with the bike owner facing arrest in some areas. I can see "bike parking meters" springing up in downtown areas where people have to pay $2 an hour to lock their bike up in some "authorized" location or else face seizure of the bike or fines.


    We already have good registration databases, and perhaps what is needed is for more marketing by bike shops of services like the NBR so people have their bikes in the recovery list before it leaves the shop. We don't need any more mandatory databases that would be hacked, compromised, and abused.

  22. #22
    Senior Member mustang1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    My Bikes
    2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
    Who is this "They" you are ranting about? A handul of cranks and crackpots posting on blogs or writing letters to the editor?
    Typically government led initiatives, usually to generate more revenue or exert greater control.
    1 cx bike, commuter (light off road), 2 road bikes (sportives and fair weather commuter), 1 mtb (off road fun and antics)

  23. #23
    Senior Member mustang1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    My Bikes
    2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Timber_8 View Post
    I can tell you here in Massachusetts The bicycle infrastructure is very advanced & improving constantly. Most lights have Bicycle sensitive pressure pads or trip lines. Bicycle routes are clearly marked in the streets. Boston is constantly promoting Bicycle paths and routing & in general is very supportive of Bicycle commuting. I also have to say that the community for the most part has been very friendly to Bicycle riders. Bike paths are expensive but there is also a trade off. for every bike commuter there is less ware & tear on roads, less congestion, less health care related expense. It is a win win. I don't believe we need another tax to discourage people from Bikeing.
    Quote Originally Posted by mlts22 View Post
    I don't like bicycle registration. Already, there are services like the National Bike Registry to register frame serial numbers with tracking services, so adding another is pointless. The disadvantages are many for mandatory registration:
    • It is another database for blackhats to compromise and sell to thieves for targeted thefts, or in extreme cases, holdups.
    • A registration database likely would have no printed privacy policy or regulations on use. Who gets to sift through the information and correlate it with other database entries for more invasive uses? Would insurance companies get another excuse jack up premiums on road bike owners because they go faster than those with beach cruisers, and thus more chance of a higher speed collision?
    • It would be another lowbrow tool for municipalities to get money. Yes, this is a slippery slope argument, but it wouldn't be far-fetched for bike hostile cities to start charging a registration fee (likely the same as motorized vehicles) as another revenue stream. I can see the argument now, "if it is a vehicle and has vehicle rights on the road, it pays the vehicle registration fee." Perhaps they might add some "inspections" for another hit of $50 a year. Of course, tracking bikes allows parking tickets to be issued with the bike owner facing arrest in some areas. I can see "bike parking meters" springing up in downtown areas where people have to pay $2 an hour to lock their bike up in some "authorized" location or else face seizure of the bike or fines.


    We already have good registration databases, and perhaps what is needed is for more marketing by bike shops of services like the NBR so people have their bikes in the recovery list before it leaves the shop. We don't need any more mandatory databases that would be hacked, compromised, and abused.
    You guys conveyed my thought a lot more eloquently than my OP ranting did. Thank you.

    For those who asked for 'source', I didn't look for any. I was listening to a bike podcast where the guy mentioned some new law for cyclists, got me thinking about all these bike registration schemes I've heard about over last three years, the time when British govt attempted to create bike number plates at a 'nominal' cost (at launch, who knows what this cost will be further down the line) but it didn't take off. Last I heard, they're still looking into it. I dont have a specific source, but there are pletny of articles out there.
    1 cx bike, commuter (light off road), 2 road bikes (sportives and fair weather commuter), 1 mtb (off road fun and antics)

  24. #24
    Been Around Awhile I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Burlington Iowa
    My Bikes
    Vaterland and Ragazzi
    Posts
    20,624
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mustang1 View Post

    For those who asked for 'source', I didn't look for any.
    I didn't think so.

  25. #25
    Old fart JohnDThompson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Appleton WI
    My Bikes
    Several, mostly not name brands.
    Posts
    13,141
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JanMM View Post
    Beware of "they"!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •