Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    EóBike Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Bike Computer Mileage?

    Okay guys... this might be for the mathematicians amongst us LOL.

    I've just fitted a Sigma BC 506 bike computer to my treadly. It's working OK (nominally) except that the odometer is measuring significantly less mileage than it should be. Over a measured distance (and confirmed via Google maps to within around 100m) it's reading 18% less than the true distance.

    I've got 26 x 1.75 smooth tread tyre at 35 PSI.

    As per the Sigma's instruction manual, I've used their 2070 setting on the computer.

    ...so, have I got a 'lemon' with the Sigma, or can I simply choose another size setting ó say for a 26 x 1.9 tyre?

    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would just change to another size setting. Tires can be quite different in OVERALL diameter , rather than rim size. If you have access to a GPS, use it to set up a planned route,, such as 1.2 miles, set bike computer , ride & adjust it til you get it close enough. It probably won't perfectly match the GPS.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT, Cannondale Hybrid, Raleigh Supercourse
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    See the Sheldon Brown site for information on calibrating your cyclecomputer. http://sheldonbrown.com/cyclecomputer-calibration.html

  4. #4
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,858
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't have any bike tires inflated as low as 35 psi...

    Anyway, what you should be able to do is measure "rollout", as it's called. Mark a point on the tire, ride it for ten revolutions of the wheel, measure the distance, then divide that distance by ten. That gives you your actual tire circumference while riding, taking into account the change in its shape due to rider weight.

    I mentioned low PSI because it could be that the tires are deforming enough to change the riding circumference and induce error in the odometer. Imagine riding on a bare rim and how much smaller that is than a tire, then think of the difference between that and a tire inflated so hard that it doesn't deform at all -- a squishy-soft tire would be somewhere in between.

  5. #5
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,858
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On second thought, if your tires were deforming and throwing off the odometer, it would read longer than the actual distance. So, never mind that idea.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    3,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BarracksSi View Post
    Anyway, what you should be able to do is measure "rollout", as it's called. Mark a point on the tire, ride it for ten revolutions of the wheel, measure the distance, then divide that distance by ten. That gives you your actual tire circumference while riding, taking into account the change in its shape due to rider weight.
    Don't know if this is the case for all bike computers, but every one I've owned for the last 20 years, at least, has used the tire circumference in millimeters as the setting. Roll out as above (I only use one revolution, because 10 takes 75 feet or so, but 10 would theoretically be more accurate) and set the puter.
    In practice, close enough is close enough. I used to reset when I swapped the computer from a bike with 25mm tires to one with 32mm tires, but on the road you don't ride a straight line anyway--you wobble, go around potholes, change lanes, all kinds of things. What's it matter if you're off 10 feet per mile?
    If you do your rollout next to a wall you can use for support, you can sit on the bike while you roll and allow for tire deformation. I usually do it that way, but I've never compared to an unloaded bike to see if it's significant.

  7. #7
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Crystal River and Hernando, Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO 105
    Posts
    13,787
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ausGeoff View Post
    I've got 26 x 1.75 smooth tread tyre at 35 PSI.
    How often do you have a pinch flat?
    Have you inflated your tires to something nearer the top end of what is shown on the tire sidewall. If you do you may find that the mileage will be very close to correct using the 2070 number. If you want to run your tires that soft (35 psi) maybe you should do a roll out measurement. That will give you a more accurate number to program into the computer.
    My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---2015 Cannondale Supersix EVO carbon 105

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  8. #8
    Cycle Year Round CB HI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    11,420
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Like the other said, put more air in your tires. The sidewall should have a pressure range for the tire.

    Try setting your computer to 2440.

    2070 x 1.18 = 2443

  9. #9
    Senior Member KungPaoSchwinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ms/Ca, USA,Earth.
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek FX 7.3 ( pimp moment )
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BarracksSi View Post
    Anyway, what you should be able to do is measure "rollout", as it's called.
    .
    What he said.
    2009 Trek FX 7.3

  10. #10
    rebmeM roineS JanMM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    My Bikes
    RANS V3, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
    Posts
    11,670
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KungPaoSchwinn View Post
    What he said.
    That's the ticket.
    RANS V3 (steel), RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

  11. #11
    EóBike Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the suggestions guys. Much appreciated!

    I did the rollout measurement, which came out at 2050mm, but was still giving an incorrect distance. Over the last few days I've been fine-tuning the value over the same measured distance, and now have it set at 2010 which is almost spot on — and close enough not to worry about any minor difference.

    This setting is actually closer to a 26 x 1 tyre, so I dunno how Sigma programmed their defaults.

    Anyway, problem solved.

  12. #12
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,858
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ausGeoff View Post
    I've got 26 x 1.75 smooth tread tyre at 35 PSI.
    Quote Originally Posted by ausGeoff View Post
    This setting is actually closer to a 26 x 1 tyre, so I dunno how Sigma programmed their defaults.
    Are you still running it at 35 psi, too? If so, it sounds like the 1.75 tire is deforming enough that its rolling circumference is closer to a fully-inflated 1" tire. But, the front tire wouldn't deform nearly as much as the rear.

    Sigma might have also programmed its 26x1.75 setting as if the bike had knobby tires instead of smooth tread. The tire size is more about its carcass and the room it has inside, not how deep the tread is, so a smooth 26x1.75 slick tire would have a smaller "on-the-road" circumference than a 26x1.75 deep-lugged mud tire.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Close enough,, is good enough, I would say.

  14. #14
    EóBike Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    42
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BarracksSi View Post
    Sigma might have also programmed its 26x1.75 setting as if the bike had knobby tires instead of smooth tread. The tire size is more about its carcass and the room it has inside, not how deep the tread is, so a smooth 26x1.75 slick tire would have a smaller "on-the-road" circumference than a 26x1.75 deep-lugged mud tire.
    Good point...

    Sigma don't say what type of tread pattern they've calibrated their computers for. I guess a slick and a knobbly tyre could have maybe at least 2cm diference in OD (10mm lugs x 2) whilst having identical carcass diameters.

    And yeah... I'm still running the front at 35PSI, and the rear at 60PSI as it's an electric bike, with a rear-wheel hub motor, plus a steel frame, plus my 95kg body mass! I've based those pressures on a 45kg front loading v. an 85kg rear loading.

    Cheers.

  15. #15
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ausGeoff View Post
    Good point...

    Sigma don't say what type of tread pattern they've calibrated their computers for. I guess a slick and a knobbly tyre could have maybe at least 2cm diference in OD (10mm lugs x 2) whilst having identical carcass diameters.

    And yeah... I'm still running the front at 35PSI, and the rear at 60PSI as it's an electric bike, with a rear-wheel hub motor, plus a steel frame, plus my 95kg body mass! I've based those pressures on a 45kg front loading v. an 85kg rear loading.

    Cheers.
    35 psi in the front and touch a kerb- fall down a pothole ot even run over a pebble in the road. Hope you carry a spare tube- levers and a Pump.
    How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


    Spike Milligan

  16. #16
    Dirt Bomb sknhgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,595
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've thought about this but haven't gone to the trouble to try it: Put a dab of paint on the ground. Ride over it. Your tire should print a mark on the road the exact circumference of the tire. Measure the distance between paint marks on the road.

  17. #17
    Son of Fred Bander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Chesapeake, VA
    Posts
    122
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sknhgy View Post
    I've thought about this but haven't gone to the trouble to try it: Put a dab of paint on the ground. Ride over it. Your tire should print a mark on the road the exact circumference of the tire. Measure the distance between paint marks on the road.
    Or just use a wet spot...same result without a lasting mark anywhere.
    Quote Originally Posted by patentcad
    So what's the problem? The whole friggin sport of cycling is rude and stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
    I would hang their severed heads from my back panniers as a warning.

  18. #18
    Uber Goober StephenH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas area, Texas
    Posts
    10,593
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The difference between 2010 and 2070 is about 3%, not 18%. Anyway, sounds like you're good there.

    The main reason I know of to have an accurate measurement is if you follow cue sheets in randonneuring, which will typically have directions like "Turn left at (unmarked) CR 318 at mile 78.6". There it helps to be pretty much right on, and using the roll-out (with just a single rotation), that has worked for me. I did the roll-outs with me sitting on the bike, not empty.

    I've been running the tires on my Worksman cruiser at 45 psi. They're 26x2.125. I bought an old Schwinn industrial bike a while back, and the 26x2.125" tires on it were only rated for 35 psi. So that's not necessarily unreasonable for your slightly narrower tires. If it works for you, no reason to change it.
    "be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."

  19. #19
    Senior Member BlazingPedals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Middle of da Mitten
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
    Posts
    7,221
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The numbers in the manual are never right. They're only there as a very rough ballpark estimate. Speaking of estimates, I converted 1.75" to metric (44.5mm), doubled it and added 559mm for the bead seat diameter, and came up with a circumference of 2034mm. That's also a ballpark because most tires are not labeled accurately. If you get a number by actual roll-out with weight on the bike, and it still doesn't match up with the GPS, then there's something going on with the GPS.

    How I do it: set the valve stem on the bottom of the wheel, over a chalk mark or sidewalk crack. Sit on bike and roll it forward for 3 tire revolutions of the wheel which has the sensor magnet, coming to rest with the valve stem at the bottom of the wheel. Mark the pavement and measure with a tape. If you need to convert, 1 inch = 25.4 mm. Divide by 3 to get the circumference of the tire. Using this method, you should be able to get within 0.5% accuracy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •