Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-13-10, 07:12 AM   #1
daven1986
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Bikes:
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why have front suspension?

When thinking about how to increase my comfort while riding on bad roads, I wondered what is the point of front suspension? Surely it would be better to just have rear suspension or a suspension seat post?

So what actually does front suspension do?

Thanks

Daven
daven1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 08:46 AM   #2
wahoonc
Senior Member
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Posts: 16,768
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven1986 View Post
When thinking about how to increase my comfort while riding on bad roads, I wondered what is the point of front suspension? Surely it would be better to just have rear suspension or a suspension seat post?

So what actually does front suspension do?

Thanks

Daven
Makes the bike look cool and marketing. IMHO an awful lot of the suspension stuff on bikes is unneeded and only drives up the price and the complexity. On a mountain bike it makes sense. FWIW if I happen to buy a bike with a suspension seat post that is the first thing to go, they take away from the efficiency of the rider. I also stiffen up or lock out the front suspension.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 09:01 AM   #3
NorcoSasquatch
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Bikes: '09 Norco Sasquatch, '07 Speacilized Hardrock
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, for mountain biking it's obvious. WHENEVER i ride i stand. I cannot sit down. I've found that front suspension bikes absorb some bumps every were on the bike. With front suspension sitting, you will feel reasonably less bumps, that having no suspension.
However, having any suspension makes the effort reasonably harder you have to put forward to move the bike at a reasonable speed.
NorcoSasquatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 10:09 AM   #4
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 9,644
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven1986 View Post
When thinking about how to increase my comfort while riding on bad roads, I wondered what is the point of front suspension? Surely it would be better to just have rear suspension or a suspension seat post?

So what actually does front suspension do?

Thanks

Daven
Front suspension is there (on mountain bikes) primarily to keep the front wheel from being thrown off-course. There is less need for rear suspension because the rear wheel will tend to follow the genaral path of the front wheel. Basically, the rear wheel is being pulled by the rider's mass (which is ahead of the rear wheel). Even with suspension, mountain bikers need to use the same suspension that riders without suspension use: their legs.

I'd guess that suspension doesn't work as well at higher speeds. Road riders deal with bumps by getting off of the seat. With dropped bars, this is easier to do because less weight is on the seat.

What size tires are you using?

Last edited by njkayaker; 03-13-10 at 10:12 AM.
njkayaker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 10:13 AM   #5
v70cat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Bikes: S5 VWD
Posts: 3,602
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For anything other than a mountain bike, suspension is more weight loss of power and more cost.

It all about marketing and a total waste.
v70cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 12:34 PM   #6
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by v70cat View Post
For anything other than a mountain bike, suspension is more weight loss of power and more cost.

It all about marketing and a total waste.
I rode rigid MTB's aggresively offroad till 200. Reason for front suspension was that I needed it after a bypass and I could not take the knocks the chest was taking.

But onroad- there are other ways of getting a "Softer" ride. Unless you are talking $$$'s then front suspension will not be good. It will take the sting out of the bumps a bit but Pogo Stick comes to mind- and weight- and loss of propulsion.

Just by using a wider tyre with less pressure in it will give a lot of comfort without a great loss of energy. Better quality wheels with a lacing pattern on the spokes that has them crossing 3 times will assist a lot. And hate to say it- improving your riding style to make the arms and legs act as shock absorbers helps even more.

Suspension seat posts are a problem. I have an offroad Tandem and suspension for the stoker is a necessity. Cheap ones caused problems and broke freqently. I had to spend a lot of money on a Cane Creek "Thud Buster" to get one that worked and did not cause problems. So if you want a comfortable ride- get a top quality suspension post and use the arms to take the bumps. Or as I have said-get better wheels- wider tyres and modify the way you ride to make it comfortable.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 01:55 PM   #7
daven1986
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Bikes:
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
Front suspension is there (on mountain bikes) primarily to keep the front wheel from being thrown off-course. There is less need for rear suspension because the rear wheel will tend to follow the genaral path of the front wheel. Basically, the rear wheel is being pulled by the rider's mass (which is ahead of the rear wheel). Even with suspension, mountain bikers need to use the same suspension that riders without suspension use: their legs.
Thanks, this is what I was looking for.
daven1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 07:03 PM   #8
DX-MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 4,789
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
OK, PEOPLE -- LET'S GET OFF THIS POGO-STICK CRAP! Yes, front suspension will add weight to the bike, and if all you do is ride road, you don't need it. But just because it's suspension does NOT mean it squishes and bounces with every motion. THAT'S what you get with the crap at Wal-Mart, not a real setup.

Front suspension changes bumps in your path from punches to pushes. Rear suspension does that for your spine, front for your arms and chest.

I swear, some of you are as bad as drivers about our road rights....
DX-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-10, 10:14 PM   #9
Arcanum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Bikes: 2010 Kona Dr. Dew, Moose Bicycle XXL (fat bike), Yuba Mundo V3
Posts: 903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Suspension forks on hybrid-type bikes are about comfort. They absorb shocks from bumps in the road. Yes, they reduce efficiency to a greater or lesser degree. Yes, they're heavier. However, saying that's why they're categorically bad on anything but a mountain bike is missing the point.
Arcanum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-10, 01:45 AM   #10
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DX-MAN View Post
OK, PEOPLE -- LET'S GET OFF THIS POGO-STICK CRAP! Yes, front suspension will add weight to the bike, and if all you do is ride road, you don't need it. But just because it's suspension does NOT mean it squishes and bounces with every motion. THAT'S what you get with the crap at Wal-Mart, not a real setup.

Front suspension changes bumps in your path from punches to pushes. Rear suspension does that for your spine, front for your arms and chest.

I swear, some of you are as bad as drivers about our road rights....
Unless you are prepared to pay out some real money for a good suspension fork- you are going to get a crap POGO-STICK. Cheap end bikes will not have a good suspension fork on it. A good one would cost more than the bike does in the first place. And even a cheap one that is just about sensible does not cost much less.

Cheap suspension will just be a Spring inside a column. It will take the "Sting" out of a bump- but where is the damping to stop it rebounding for the next bump? It is like a cars shock absorber- no damping and you will keep bouncing. It is a POGO STICK. There will be no adjustment for riders weight so it is set up as an average. Light rider will never be able to take advantage of the "Suspension" and a heavy rider will just compress to the limit and eventually have problems with the fork breaking. And when it does break- many of them cannot be stripped down and if you can- they cannot be rebuilt.

So if you just "Have to have" a suspension fork on your bike- Look out for one that does have a damping/ rebound system on it- can be adjusted for riders weight- can be stripped down for maintenance and rebuilding and will be suitable for the use you are going to put it to. And if you find one for less than $250- check out that it is genuine.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 PM.