Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 65 of 65
  1. #51
    Every lane is a bike lane Chris L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia - passionfruit capital of the universe!
    Posts
    9,622
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by calamarichris View Post
    Thanks for your puh-liteness. That's such a rare virtue in internet conversations these days.
    I never said licensing would be effective, but that won't stop a frustrated electorate from making it a reality. Puh-lease try to remain focused on the issue at hand instead of engaging in emotional tirades.
    I was totally focused on the conversation at hand. Had you read the entire post instead of a sentence and a half, you would have seen that.
    "I am never going to flirt with idleness again" - Roy Keane
    "We invite everyone to question the entire culture we take for granted." - Manic Street Preachers.
    My blog.
    My bike tours. Japan tour page under construction.

  2. #52
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Landsdowne PA,
    My Bikes
    Scott SUB 20
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crank Turner View Post
    When they start regulating bicycles, I'm going to start an outlaw bicycle gang.
    I'm in! I think the gangs name should be the Regulators LOL.

  3. #53
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When bicycles are the primary users of the roadways, perhaps we need to talk about licensing and other sources of revenue. Till then it is and always has been an idiot's knee-jerk attempt at a money grab that always turns out to cost more than it generates and impossible to effectively enforce.
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    IL-USA
    Posts
    1,606
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The main value of bicycle licensing is not to restrict unsafe habits, it would be to reduce theft.

    If all bicycles ridden on the street were required to carry license plates, and if the police were allowed to stop bicycles without license plates just for that reason--and the license plates had to be renewed each year at the motor vehicle office where they would check the serial number of the bicycle, then that would DRASTICALLY lower the value of stolen bicycles. A stolen bicycle would be effectively useless, and if a stolen bicycle was recovered, there would be a current owner listed that the police could contact.

    As it stands now, there is effectively no penalty for using a stolen bicycle. Unless the thief is dumb enough to stay in the same neighborhood or doesn't bother to spray-paint the thing, it's highly unlikely that the original owner can ever track down a stolen bicycle.

    ------

    Licensing bicycles is not so much a matter of restricting ownership, because if you wanted to remove unsafe riders from the street--then you would license riders, and not the bicycles. But you see--only licensing the bicycle riders wouldn't do anything to prevent bicycle theft.

    I expect it will come to pass (in the USA) but I don't know when.
    When license plates for cars first were enacted, it was seen as a huge offense to civil society--but nowadays everyone expects it--because theft and accidents would be WAY higher without it.
    ~
    Last edited by Doug5150; 06-09-10 at 09:04 AM.

  5. #55
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If it were theft purposes...I'd be willing to pay alot more to register a bike and have it lo-jacked with a pet type chip, IR tag, or even GPS. But then we just create a subculture of bike chop shops.

  6. #56
    Member Crank Turner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug5150 View Post
    The main value of bicycle licensing is not to restrict unsafe habits, it would be to reduce theft.

    If all bicycles ridden on the street were required to carry license plates, and if the police were allowed to stop bicycles without license plates just for that reason--and the license plates had to be renewed each year at the motor vehicle office where they would check the serial number of the bicycle, then that would DRASTICALLY lower the value of stolen bicycles. A stolen bicycle would be effectively useless, and if a stolen bicycle was recovered, there would be a current owner listed that the police could contact.

    As it stands now, there is effectively no penalty for using a stolen bicycle. Unless the thief is dumb enough to stay in the same neighborhood or doesn't bother to spray-paint the thing, it's highly unlikely that the original owner can ever track down a stolen bicycle.

    ------

    Licensing bicycles is not so much a matter of restricting ownership, because if you wanted to remove unsafe riders from the street--then you would license riders, and not the bicycles. But you see--only licensing the bicycle riders wouldn't do anything to prevent bicycle theft.

    I expect it will come to pass (in the USA) but I don't know when.
    When license plates for cars first were enacted, it was seen as a huge offense to civil society--but nowadays everyone expects it--because theft and accidents would be WAY higher without it.
    ~
    That's called "registration" which isn't the same as licensing.

    What you will find is that people will just strip all the components anyway. You're forgetting how light and portable bicycles are compared to motor vehicles. There isn't need to start an engine or have a truck to haul them which is why bike theft is stealthy.

    Even the components are a lot lighter and easier to store than motor vehicles and a lot easier and quicker to remove too.

    They will still be just as easy to steal.

  7. #57
    Senior Member BlazingPedals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Middle of da Mitten
    My Bikes
    Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
    Posts
    7,157
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug5150 View Post
    The main value of bicycle licensing is not to restrict unsafe habits, it would be to reduce theft.

    Been tried, didn't work. The problem is, police aren't interested in returning a bike to its rightful owner; not when it can pull in cash at the next bike auction. Most bikes aren't valuable enough to warrant spending any time on, not when 80% of them are BSOs (Bike-Shaped Objects) from Wally World.

  8. #58
    your nightmare gal chipcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    The Cracker Factory
    Posts
    24,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TRaffic Jammer View Post
    If it were theft purposes...I'd be willing to pay alot more to register a bike and have it lo-jacked with a pet type chip, IR tag, or even GPS. But then we just create a subculture of bike chop shops.
    I've been contemplating small business opportunities for my "retirement" - thanks for the ideas TJ!
    "Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

  9. #59
    Single-serving poster electrik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    5,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TRaffic Jammer View Post
    If it were theft purposes...I'd be willing to pay alot more to register a bike and have it lo-jacked with a pet type chip, IR tag, or even GPS. But then we just create a subculture of bike chop shops.
    Then we could have something like this:

    Only with better looking cops!

    Maybe it's worth it for chipcom to setup his retirement business just to get her to visit!

  10. #60
    Senior Member trustnoone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Edmonton AB
    My Bikes
    2011 Colnago World Cup, 2012 Eddy Merckx AMX-2
    Posts
    517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug5150 View Post
    The main value of bicycle licensing is not to restrict unsafe habits, it would be to reduce theft.
    Of course, because there hasn't been a car stolen since licence plates were introduced. How would these licenses be mounted? I think a bike thief can figure out that he could buy or steal a registration plate. Wire snip the old plate off and zap strap it to his victim's bike and ride home.

    Do you really think that police are going to be sitting in thier patrol cars running plates on bicycles?

  11. #61
    Senior Member Yellowbeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug5150 View Post
    The main value of bicycle licensing is not to restrict unsafe habits, it would be to reduce theft.

    If all bicycles ridden on the street were required to carry license plates, and if the police were allowed to stop bicycles without license plates just for that reason--and the license plates had to be renewed each year at the motor vehicle office where they would check the serial number of the bicycle, then that would DRASTICALLY lower the value of stolen bicycles. A stolen bicycle would be effectively useless, and if a stolen bicycle was recovered, there would be a current owner listed that the police could contact.

    As it stands now, there is effectively no penalty for using a stolen bicycle. Unless the thief is dumb enough to stay in the same neighborhood or doesn't bother to spray-paint the thing, it's highly unlikely that the original owner can ever track down a stolen bicycle.

    ------

    Licensing bicycles is not so much a matter of restricting ownership, because if you wanted to remove unsafe riders from the street--then you would license riders, and not the bicycles. But you see--only licensing the bicycle riders wouldn't do anything to prevent bicycle theft.

    I expect it will come to pass (in the USA) but I don't know when.
    When license plates for cars first were enacted, it was seen as a huge offense to civil society--but nowadays everyone expects it--because theft and accidents would be WAY higher without it.
    ~

    Oh great. So now I'd be required to pay whatever inflated registration price they'd come up with for each and every one of my rideable bicycles? The ones that are likely to be stolen (that is, the useful ones) are worth far less than any serious registration program would charge me. And what if they get parted out? What if a frame is damaged and I scavenge a new one for use with the same components, do I have to pay to re-register for the new-old serial number? I'd bet that so many people would skip registration altogether that it wouldn't lower the value of a stolen bicycle by much at all.

    That said, I don't think licensing would ruin the joy of cycling at all. If (a considerably richer me) bought a completely impractical 500 hp sports car, it wouldn't be the license plate that keeps me from enjoying it's full capabilities on a whim, it's the speed limits and the danger posed on public roads. I can take the most impractical, pure-performance racing bike out on many streets and go "flat out" without causing any trouble. In fact, the only thing I can think of that would ruin that joy forever is if everybody started riding bikes and clogged up the roadways with a slower average speed than mine. So the greatest threats to the various carefree joys of cycling are deterioration of the roads, and too many people on bikes.
    I'll eat it first.

  12. #62
    Senior Member gldrgidr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    96
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The real problem is that with registration will come an insurance requirement just like for cars. The current bureaucracy connects insurance with registration.

  13. #63
    Senior Member Kimmitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Oceanside, CA
    My Bikes
    Electra Townie 3i with xtracycle, Surly Cross-Check
    Posts
    952
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would be fine with having to get a bicycle license which is based on weight and is therefore 1/100th as difficult to get as an automobile license.
    I see unexamined people. All the time. I don't think they know they're unexamined.

  14. #64
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    16,236
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gldrgidr View Post
    The real problem is that with registration will come an insurance requirement just like for cars. The current bureaucracy connects insurance with registration.
    And in many states it is a joke. In NC nearly 20% of the vehicles on the road on any given day are operated without insurance, add to that the number of drivers with no license or a suspended license and nearly 1/3 of them are being operated illegally. Then factor in the low liability requirements and the total can exceed 50%.

    They cannot provide the manpower necessary to enforce the laws that currently on the books and they want to add more? Just makes it easier for the scofflaws

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

  15. #65
    RatedZ
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by CNY James View Post
    The only reason I would care is it seems to me another layer of bureaucracy. It annoys me that gov'ts seem to find more and more ways to charge fees and taxes & regulate what we do. But that's just me. If it was law, I would likely get a license just to avoid the fines for not having one but I wouldn't be thrilled about it. I would sign a petition, write to my legislators, protest, whatever to try to stop the bill before it passed.
    Wouldn't matter, dude. The gov't will do what they wanna do, regardless who does or doesn't sign a petition. The entire country could sign a petition and if those 792 idiots wanted to pass a bill, they'd do it anyway.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •