Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62
  1. #26
    Senior Member AjAx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Idaho
    My Bikes
    1980 Univega Custom, Raleigh C30, Raleigh R600
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kestrelman
    WTF????
    That's all I can say.......

  2. #27
    Forum Admin lotek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    n.w. superdrome
    My Bikes
    1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
    Posts
    17,623
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well given I'm an old fart who has never heard that yellow livestrong bracelets
    mean anything other than I support lance's cancer foundation, why don't we stop
    the BS, and hints and inuendo's and just state what the hell it means.
    Prude or not, it would be nice to be let in on the secret.
    The whole thing is just so much BS, as if kids today don't have enough to
    worry about. You have kids, who have resisted drugs, alcohol, gang banging, etc.
    and they get DQ'd coz they wore a LIVESTRONG bracelet?
    someone has got their priorities all wrong.
    ok, getting off the soapbox now.

    Marty
    Sono più lento di quel che sembra.
    Odio la gente, tutti.

    Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
    Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.

  3. #28
    Ride the Road Daily Commute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
    Posts
    4,059
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DMax
    "Linda Babb, Kellam High school’s athletic director and the administrator who oversees Beach District cross country, said she twice issued warnings to coaches about the “no jewelry” policy. She added that coaches received copies of the rules at the beginning of the season and were e-mailed prior to Wednesday’s meet with reminders that the rule would be enforced."

    Stupid rule, maybe. But stupid coaches should bear the most blame.
    But no one said that the yellow bands counted as "jewelry." If that's what the idiot administrator meant that's what the idiot administrator should have said. I'm disappointed that the non-affected coaches didn't protest. That would have been a great show of sportsmanship.

    Edit: See my post below. The administrator had the courage to admit the mistake. I was wrong to call him an idiot.
    Last edited by Daily Commute; 10-12-04 at 05:05 PM.

  4. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Laggard
    I officiate soccer. Under FIFA laws, no jewelry is allowed during a match. The only exception is for medical alert bracelets.

    There's a good reason for this law.

    While checking in a U13 girls team this weekend, I noticed two players had livestrong bracelets on. I let it go. The bands are rubber and pose little risk to themselves or others.

    I could and probably should have told the players to remove them.
    So do I, or say I used to, and you were morally correct to let them wear them!

  5. #30
    aka old dog greywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    tauranga New Zealand
    Posts
    1,173
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What would they have done if every single competitor had worn one ??
    Its all about power-tripping ,a bunch of pathetic fools !!!
    :D
    dont worry be happy ????

  6. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    NE South Dakota
    My Bikes
    89 Bottecchia, 90's Eddy Merckx MXL, Vision R40, Blk Mtn Cycles Super Cross
    Posts
    73
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Daily Commute
    But no one said that the yellow bands counted as "jewelry." If that's what the idiot administrator meant that's what the idiot administrator should have said. I'm disappointed that the non-affected coaches didn't protest. That would have been a great show of sportsmanship.
    Hah, that is pretty funny. I would suspect that the losing coaches are the ones that made the protest which caused the DQ, essentially making thier loser the winner.

  7. #32
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,718
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DMax
    "Linda Babb, Kellam High school’s athletic director and the administrator who oversees Beach District cross country, said she twice issued warnings to coaches about the “no jewelry” policy. She added that coaches received copies of the rules at the beginning of the season and were e-mailed prior to Wednesday’s meet with reminders that the rule would be enforced."

    Stupid rule, maybe. But stupid coaches should bear the most blame.
    If somebody took the time to send me an email that said that a certain rule was going to be enforced, I'd believe them. After the fact, I'd be too embarassed to admit that I hadn't taken the warning. The lesson is that sometimes our actions have repercushions that we feel are out-of-porportion with the crime that we committed. That's the way life is so deal with it!

    To me, the scary part is that these idiotic people on both sides of the issue are all teachers influencing our youth.

  8. #33
    Tom (ex)Builder twahl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Manassas, VA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Allez
    Posts
    2,814
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DMax
    "Linda Babb, Kellam High school’s athletic director and the administrator who oversees Beach District cross country, said she twice issued warnings to coaches about the “no jewelry” policy. She added that coaches received copies of the rules at the beginning of the season and were e-mailed prior to Wednesday’s meet with reminders that the rule would be enforced."

    Stupid rule, maybe. But stupid coaches should bear the most blame.
    I disagree. If the twit had a thing specifically for the Livestrong bracelets, she should have mentioned them specifically. If religious and emergency jewelry is allowed as a specified exception, and watches are commonly disregarded, then the coaches apparently felt that the Livestrong bracelets didn't present a safety hazard that would prevent them being exempted as well. Think that any of Kellam's athletes were disqualified, or did her coach get a quiet word in the lounge that she was targeting the Livestrong bracelets? Think those students were chuckling on the starting lines?
    Tom

    "It hurts so good..."

  9. #34
    Footballus vita est iamlucky13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Portland, OR
    My Bikes
    Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
    Posts
    2,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wait a second, I remember watching a little bit of the Olympics and seeing one of the US 400 runners with a big piece of silver bling around his neck and a pair Oakleys on his face while he ran. Sure it's a different governing body, but the concerns should still be the same.

    From Katy Winsper, runner
    “I think it’s a silly rule,” she said. “But had I been told at the starting line, I would have obeyed it
    I think it's a downright stupid, or at least a downright stupid ruling on a rule that may have some legitimate basis. In Katy's, the article said she had an elastic hair band around her wrist. She ran her best time but it doesn't count because they declared it jewelry after the race. Honestly, who considers hair ties jewelry when a wrist watch is not (according to the article). In fact, the way the article is written, it sounds almost like entrapment.

    Does anyone out there honestly believe that this ruling contributes at all in way, shape, or form to the goals of high school athletics?
    "The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad

  10. #35
    Gitchur SUV Away From Me
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Carmichael, California
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lotek
    You have kids, who have resisted drugs, alcohol, gang banging, etc.
    and they get DQ'd coz they wore a LIVESTRONG bracelet? someone has got their priorities all wrong.
    Wise words indeed. Too often bureaucrats/administrators lose sight of the bigger picture. I also agree with some of the other posters who question whether or not LiveStrong bands fall under the category of "jewelry." Last time I was at a jeweler's I didn't see any silicone rubber being sold there...

  11. #36
    Senior Member danr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Midwest USA
    My Bikes
    Trek 8000 (I'm testing a prototype).
    Posts
    590
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rules are rules. If you let them wear the Livestrong wristbands, then you have to let everyone else wear whatever they want.

    I think they should have issued a warning before the race. However, since others will be stupid and wear things like studded bracelets or friendship beads, the rule must be enforced.
    Does the perfect bike really exist?

  12. #37
    for drinking Straws's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    RVA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In HS track and XC events you dont tell the kids before each event to take off their jewelry. It's a rule that applies at every event. This doesnt matter of course because this isnt jewelry, its a LiveStrong band! Why is this not allowed?!?!

  13. #38
    true...true. think5577's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    RVA
    My Bikes
    The ones with wheels
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thats crazy. Thats my old High School (Ocean Lakes). Coach Nestor was my 10th grade English teacher, cool as hell too. Leave it to Virginia Beach high school admin. to be jerks about it. It doesnt suprise me though. That whole area is wack.
    "Truth is a pathless land." - J. Krishnamurti

  14. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,411
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you know, I was actually thinking it was an advertising thing. I remeber a CC running race that I was in where I was told to take off my underarmour shirt (running in 40 degrees with just a singlet sucks) becuase the logo was visible. apparently they were worried about athletes with logos becuase they didn't want pro HS athletes. there is so much bull**** that goes on becuase the officials are worried about a "slippery slope" effect where if something is allowed, then something else that actually might be harmful is allowed also under the same exception.

  15. #40
    Bike Happy DanFromDetroit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI USA
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What I find most interesting about this is that almost none of these kids, or coaches for that matter, knew the rule existed.

    All jewelry means all jewelry. Watches, rings, bracelets, livestrong bands, etc. This is not rocket science and should be very simple. I also think that if you start making exceptions for specific types of jewelry, then the situation becomes more complex than need be. You have to consult a rule book to see what you can and cannot wear. Leaving it at all jewelry keeps it simple.

    A similar rule exists in Judo competition and is enforced as a matter of course.

    Of course they should have been DQ'd. They have no one to blame but the coach, who should have known better.

    Dan
    There is nothing homlier than the face on your last dime.
    --John Wildcat, Greenback Friend

  16. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    248
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A smart coach would have responded that it's not jewelry, it's clothing - part of the uniform!

  17. #42
    Senior Member Ebbtide's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ohio's Cycling Capital, America's North Coast.
    Posts
    4,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DanFromDetroit
    What I find most interesting about this is that almost none of these kids, or coaches for that matter, knew the rule existed.

    All jewelry means all jewelry. Watches, rings, bracelets, livestrong bands, etc. This is not rocket science and should be very simple. I also think that if you start making exceptions for specific types of jewelry, then the situation becomes more complex than need be. You have to consult a rule book to see what you can and cannot wear. Leaving it at all jewelry keeps it simple.

    A similar rule exists in Judo competition and is enforced as a matter of course.

    Of course they should have been DQ'd. They have no one to blame but the coach, who should have known better.

    Dan

    Well said, Dan.

  18. #43
    Me Likey Bikey danielmolloy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Germany
    My Bikes
    Rivendell Atlantis, Rivendell A. Homer Hilsen, Surly Steamroller
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Silicone rubber bands by definition are NOT JEWELRY. The dictionary definition of jewelry is "Ornaments, such as bracelets, necklaces, or rings, made of precious metals set with gems or imitation gems." neither are elastic hair bands, or any other non precious-metal or jewel encrusted ornaments. It's so simple.

  19. #44
    Senior Member Ebbtide's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ohio's Cycling Capital, America's North Coast.
    Posts
    4,617
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The dictionary definition of jewelry is "Ornaments, such as bracelets.
    or

    brace·let ( P ) Pronunciation Key (brslt)
    n.
    An ornamental band or chain encircling the wrist or arm.
    Something, such as a handcuff, that resembles a wrist ornament

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bracelet

  20. #45
    cab horn
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    1987 Bianchi Campione
    Posts
    28,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ehenz
    or

    brace·let ( P ) Pronunciation Key (brslt)
    n.
    An ornamental band or chain encircling the wrist or arm.
    Something, such as a handcuff, that resembles a wrist ornament

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bracelet
    I pronounce thee owned.
    This is really a non-issue, livestrong or not if the regulations forbid bracelets, jewelery or what not. It is forbidden.

  21. #46
    Ride the Road Daily Commute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    My Bikes
    Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
    Posts
    4,059
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    UPDATE: Decision reversed!!!

    The article starts:

    VIRGINIA BEACH - Stung by criticism at home and across the country, the Beach District today reversed its decision to disqualify high school cross country runners for wearing Lance Armstrong LiveStrong wristbands.

    I said the administrator was an idiot for disqualifying the runners, so I have to give him credit for having the courage to admit a mistake:
    ''I have learned a valuable lesson from the perspective of 20/20 hindsight.,'' Biehl said. ''Gray areas will often surface when competition and kids are involved. Those of us who wear the title 'official' need to work all the harder to strike the right balance between flexibility and commitment to long-standing rules.''
    Last edited by Daily Commute; 10-12-04 at 05:02 PM.

  22. #47
    Senior Member trickdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Somehere West of The Rockies
    My Bikes
    2005 MTB
    Posts
    134
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is an article that appeared on the ESPN website that is mentioned in the previous post that talked about the reversal decision. It is scathing....

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/colum...ray&id=1899682

  23. #48
    Senior Member ollo_ollo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stayton, OR
    My Bikes
    Torelli, Bianchi Trofeo, De Rosa, Specialized Expedition Touring, Colnago Cross, Motobecane Grand Jubile & Grand Record, Miyata 710, 2 Titans, Raleigh Super Course, 3Rensho
    Posts
    3,476
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Stupid rules/officials been around a long time: I was DQ back in the fifties for running a mile race barefooted when I forgot my track shoes...personal best that year & all for nothing, but I kicked butt! Coach was more upset than I was.
    visit my homebuilding blog: www.monoplanar.blogspot.com

  24. #49
    Employee Smorgasbord's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA, USA, Earth
    My Bikes
    Bridgestone 450, A Camera, 46x18 Fixed Gear, Homebrew Tandem
    Posts
    250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have to say, running with those bracelets is dangerous, same as running with loose jerseys or loose watches (also prohibited) or the like. There can be a lot of contact in Cross Country, depending on the course, and the size of the field.

    If they hadn't been DQ'd then great. When they were, they should have accepted it, especially with the coaches being notified before hand. It would have been nice if the starter had notified the field of the wristband rule, but the officials should not be criticized for it.

    Final point on the subject is that only the placing runners could possibly be upset, as being DQ'd actually affects their team and their performance contributed to the result of the meet. Other runners ran for fun or attempted personal bests etc.

    Now, in regards to ollo ollo, it is my understanding that running barefoot was acceptable if you assume the associated risks.

  25. #50
    Elite Rep
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne - Australia
    Posts
    2,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How would you feel if you were in that race

    I mean for someone to disqualify people, he must have low self esteem and that is the only thing he could do that would make him seem 'important' and make him feel good about himself.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •