Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Senior Member TrekmanDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Houston
    My Bikes
    2013 Specialized Tarmac/ 2011 Trek 1.2 / 2008 Trek 3700
    Posts
    149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cyclometers - Wireless vs. Wired

    Just two more days until I get to put the new bikes under the tree! And now, I'm already thinking about which cyclometer to get. From what I've read here, the wireless ones with the cadence feature are the latest and greatest. However, a lot of people have mentioned that they have some issues with their wireless cyclometers not working properly when they're around power lines, cell phones, etc. My wife and I have some cheap cateye wired cyclometers on our MTB's that haven't given us any issues in the past. With that said, what do you all use? Is it weird to have wired cyclometers on a road bike?

  2. #2
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,836
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that's another example of why they have both chocolate and vanilla.

    Wireless for a clean looking installation. Wired for reliability and less battery consumption. For the record, we're currently all wireless at my house.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Pearland, Texas
    My Bikes
    Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana
    Posts
    5,534
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    TmD, I prefer wired for their lack of issues with radio interferance.

    Brad

    Here's how to properly wire one:

    2.8 wiring.jpg

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mr. Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA.
    Posts
    660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The frequency at which my wireless Cateye or Garmin drops out is so low and its accompaniment impact so minor that I don't have any wired computer installed on any of my bikes. The horror stories may be from older models or from off-brands. Just get one from a reputable brand like Cateye and you should be happy.

  5. #5
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    651
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wired = 1 battery to replace, wireless = 2.

  6. #6
    Senior Member ScottStr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    My Bikes
    Windsor Wellington 3.0
    Posts
    255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got wireless because I included a heartrate monitor and I couldn't see having a wire from my chest strap to the computer, even if anybody made one like that. The computers I got are Sigma and some of the reviews complained about dropping signals. It happens some on most rides, but it's not a huge deal for me. If you need the signal to work constantly, either go wired, or high-end. Check the reviews before you buy wireless or you may get something less than you're expecting.

  7. #7
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wired, even for cadence. IMO.

    Fewer batteries, and to get a wireless that doesn't suffer interference (such as the Cateye I had, which refused to work with a Dinotte headlight nearby) means getting a 2.4 GHz model that drains batteries more quickly. Not so quick that you'd replace them every week, but still, when a wired computer can go for a few years on one battery, you get kinda spoiled.

    If I were to go wireless now, I'd spring for something that uses a power meter, too. There isn't much info I can get wirelessly that I can't also get with a wired version.

    There's a relevant thread that started in the Road forum last night:
    http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...cling-computer

  8. #8
    Humvee of bikes =Worksman Nightshade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5,279
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bradtx View Post
    TmD, I prefer wired for their lack of issues with radio interferance.

    Brad

    Here's how to properly wire one:

    2.8 wiring.jpg
    IF this don't settle the wired vs wireless debate nothing will!! WELL DONE! VERY WELL DONE INDEED!!
    My preferred bicycle brand is.......WORKSMAN CYCLES
    I dislike clipless pedals on any city bike since I feel they are unsafe.

    Originally Posted by krazygluon
    Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred, which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?

  9. #9
    Life is good RonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Between Crystal River and Hernando, Florida, 6 miles west of the Withlacoochee Trail
    My Bikes
    I've had several since 1999 but have settled on my beloved 2001 Litespeed Tuscany and my latest, a 2013 Cannondale CAAD 10.
    Posts
    13,719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My last three computers have been wireless. I change them every time I see some new and sexy. I've only have an interference problem with one of them and that only occurred a few times. Seems my computer showed that at one point in my ride (always the same spot) my max speed was 95 mph. Wow, that's a new land speed record.

    I vote you get wireless. Just don't go cheap.
    My bikes: 2001 Litespeed Tuscany---
    2013 Cannondale CAAD 10 2 "Racing Edition"--The bike shop owner said it's toast after the car-bike accident. R.I.P.
    * * 2014 or 2015 CAAD 10 3 coming soon. Decision time. * *

    Life is like a 10-speed bicycle. Most of us have gears we never use. ~ Charles Schultz

  10. #10
    Senior Member TrekmanDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Houston
    My Bikes
    2013 Specialized Tarmac/ 2011 Trek 1.2 / 2008 Trek 3700
    Posts
    149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wow... it seems like it's pretty much split down the middle. BradTx, awesome job you did with the wired setup!

    If I did decide to go wireless, are there any decent ones for under $50.. or would i have to spend an arm and a leg to ensure I get minimal interference?

  11. #11
    Senior Member Mr. Fly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA.
    Posts
    660
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TrekmanDan View Post
    Wow... it seems like it's pretty much split down the middle. BradTx, awesome job you did with the wired setup!
    Doesn't everyone wrap their wires like that?


    Quote Originally Posted by TrekmanDan View Post
    If I did decide to go wireless, are there any decent ones for under $50.. or would i have to spend an arm and a leg to ensure I get minimal interference?
    It's a bit hard to get a wireless cadence model at under $50.

    For a non-cadence, I have good luck with the Cateye Strada wireless. It's sleek, light and battery consumption is quite low.

    For ones with cadence, get its cousin the Cateye Strada double wireless. They're usually about $70, but there's currently an almost new one for $50 Buy-It-Now, shipping included (disclaimer: not affiliated).

    Skip the older generation that looks like this. It takes four CR2032 (2 at the head unit, 2 at the sensor/transmitter) and goes through batteries like they are free. Don't ask how I know. The Strada is 1+1 and battery life is much improved at maybe a change every year with normal (5000-6000 mile) usage.

  12. #12
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TrekmanDan View Post
    If I did decide to go wireless, are there any decent ones for under $50.. or would i have to spend an arm and a leg to ensure I get minimal interference?
    I think it depends on what else you have on your bike. Like RonH and some others have said, you might see a spike in your speed sometimes just because of traffic sensors or a radar trap or something like that, and that's the only problem you'll have.

    In my case, with my headlight's controller circuit, any setting other than full brightness caused enough interference that my Cateye wouldn't give a reading at all. The light's mid- and low-power "steady" settings were really just super-fast blinking, so it must have been producing a high-frequency RF buzz that freaked out the cyclometer. I didn't know this would happen, of course, so rather than ditch the light, I got a Blackburn 2.4 GHz computer instead (although I probably would've been happier with a Cateye V3 anyway).

  13. #13
    Yabba-Dabba-Doo! AlmostTrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bedrock, IL
    My Bikes
    1969 Schwinn Orange Krate, 5 speed stick shift
    Posts
    3,058
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    I think that's another example of why they have both chocolate and vanilla.

    Wireless for a clean looking installation. Wired for reliability and less battery consumption. For the record, we're currently all wireless at my house.
    Doesn't sound very "retro" to me. Shouldn't a true retro grouch be running a mechanical axle mounted mileage ticker?
    Have Bike, Will Travel

  14. #14
    Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped. BarracksSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    My Bikes
    Some bikes. Hell, they're all the same, ain't they?
    Posts
    13,857
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AlmostTrick View Post
    Doesn't sound very "retro" to me. Shouldn't a true retro grouch be running a mechanical axle mounted mileage ticker?
    I had one of those on my first bike. I was stoked when I passed 10 mph.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,836
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AlmostTrick View Post
    Doesn't sound very "retro" to me. Shouldn't a true retro grouch be running a mechanical axle mounted mileage ticker?
    Sometimes my "retro" side is at odds with my "grouch" side. The mechanical mileage tickers "tick" me off.

  16. #16
    Senior Member TrekmanDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Houston
    My Bikes
    2013 Specialized Tarmac/ 2011 Trek 1.2 / 2008 Trek 3700
    Posts
    149
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    Sometimes my "retro" side is at odds with my "grouch" side. The mechanical mileage tickers "tick" me off.
    lol

  17. #17
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    16,247
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AlmostTrick View Post
    Doesn't sound very "retro" to me. Shouldn't a true retro grouch be running a mechanical axle mounted mileage ticker?
    That's what I run...it is wireless BTW

    I do have one cycle computer on one bike, it happens to be a wired model. I have had issues with wireless on my bikes with generator hubs.

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

  18. #18
    Senior Member DVC45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    My Bikes
    Schwinn Paramount '91, Downtube Nova and I want more! :)
    Posts
    3,674
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wired for me. Its cheap, simple, reliable.
    "Cycling is for pleasure not penance"

  19. #19
    Chargers Fan
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Orange County, Ca
    My Bikes
    2010 Roubaix Expert
    Posts
    62
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a basic wireless Specialized. It's waterproof, easy to set up, looks good (white computer matches my paint), and gives me the basic information I want (speed and tripometer). I read about some people having problems with the computer falling out of its mount (mostly MTB guys), and when I bought mine from an LBS I asked them about it. Specialized has redesigned the mount so the computer slides in from the side and clicks into place. Mine has never come loose in 150 miles or so thus far. Oh, and the odometer is neat to have as well... I put the computer on my new bike before my first ride, so I know exactly how many miles are on the bike

    I don't really care about knowing my cadence or heart rate, and don't need GPS. Worst comes to worst, I always ride with my iPhone, which has GPS.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •