Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-11, 07:07 PM   #1
Easy Peasy
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 485

Low gear, sitting, and more pedaling vs higher gear, standing, less pedaling.

Which is more energy efficient?
Easy Peasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 06:48 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,429
Originally Posted by Easy Peasy View Post
Low gear, sitting, and more pedaling vs higher gear, standing, less pedaling.

Which is more energy efficient?
njkayaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 07:05 AM   #3
Big Blubbery Member
ahsposo's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On a floe
Bikes: A Home Built All Rounder, Bianchi 928, Specialized Langster, Dahon Folder
Posts: 7,060
Definitely the sit and spin.
ahsposo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 08:45 AM   #4
Senior Member
DEK's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tampa, FL.
Bikes: '11 Felt Z85, '72 Motobecane Grand Record
Posts: 1,590
I agree with the others but standing is more fun - to me anyway.
DEK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-11, 09:49 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: No Va
Posts: 117
Sit and spin - but its so much fun when I can "dance in the pedals" like a TdF mountain top finish.
ArtM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-11, 08:54 PM   #6
Drew Eckhardt
Senior Member
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sunnyvale, CA USA
Posts: 4,981
Originally Posted by njkayaker View Post
Spinning also produces less fatigue.

Consider kicking off a 418 mile supported tour with a 6000' climb including a 20 mile, 4700' stretch averaging 4.5% and reaching 6%.

Ending the day with extra Cliff bars isn't going to win you anything, but having the legs left to finish the day quickly will get you a prime camping spot with no line for a hot shower and still feeling good tomorrow will make the following 330 miles and 24,000 feet much more pleasant.
Drew Eckhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-11, 11:29 PM   #7
HokuLoa's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,335
Seated high cadence spinning punctuated by heart pumping bouts of pedaling out of the saddle at high cadence. Standing and pedaling a "too high" gear and you diminish efficiency.
HokuLoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-11, 11:51 PM   #8
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
bikingshearer's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Bikes: 1967 Paramount, 1982-ish Ron Cooper,1986 De Rosa Professional, 1978 Eisentraut "A," 1961 BianchiCompetizione, 1994 Trek 520, 199? Burley Bossa Nova, early-1970s Cinelli Speciale Corsa
Posts: 3,324
Sitting and spinning uses less energy than standing up and pushing larger gear, That does not mean you should not stand up at all. On a long climb, it is a not a bad idea every so often to shift up a gear or two and stand up foir a little bit, then sit down, shift back down, and resume your regular pace. This changes the muscles you are using a little bit and lets the one used when sitting to rest a bit.

This all assumes it is a "rhythm" climb, one on which you can fairly easily keep up a reasonable seated cadence for an extended period. On a steeper "power" climb, you do what ya gotta do to get - or what your legs and lungs can tolerate.
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-11, 05:38 AM   #9
Senior Member
JonathanGennick's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Bikes: Gary Fisher Hodgepodge 26er Rigid
Posts: 2,499
Sitting and spinning is more efficient. Often I ride with a group that's faster than I am. That's when the extra energy required by standing is especially noticeable. If I'm already struggling to hold the pace, the extra energy consumed by standing will just slay me.
JonathanGennick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-11, 06:03 AM   #10
Starting over
CraigB's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Bikes: 1990 Trek 1500; 2006 Gary Fisher Marlin; 2011 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 105; 2012 Catrike Trail
Posts: 4,081
If you meant your question literally, then yes, as the others have stated, sitting and spinning is the answer. But besides "getting to the top," there can be as many preferred outcomes to climbing a hill as there are climbers. Some want the most energy efficiency, some want to get there the fastest, some want some combination of the two, driven by what they perceive their energy needs and time requirements are for the rest of the ride.
CraigB is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:31 AM.