Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why no bikes made with tires larger then 27"

    Someone asked me this today and I didn't have an answer. Probably a stupid question but oh well, let me ask it.

    Why don't they make bikes with tires larger than 27"? I would think someone in great condition would go faster on a 31" tire with the same gear ratios and such. I'm just curious the reason why tires pretty much stopped at 27 inches.

  2. #2
    hello roadfix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    thank you for asking
    Posts
    18,502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake
    I would think someone in great condition would go faster on a 31" tire with the same gear ratios and such.
    Or, someone in great condition can go faster on a smaller set of wheels with a higher gear ratio.
    .cinelli.olympic.surly.long.haul.trucker.kona.ku.surly.steamroller.
    .litespeed.classic.litespeed.firenze.bianchi.pista.dean.colonel.plus.more.

  3. #3
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake
    Why don't they make bikes with tires larger than 27"?
    Perhaps you could go back to the reason why the concept of the safety bicycle was invented in the first place.

    Seriously though, the limits on the number of popular tyre sizes is basically one governed by the industry and the manufacturers. There is a lot of under-the-cover costs associated with maintaining many different sizes of tyres. Standardising on a couple keeps production and inventory costs down. It's all about economics.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  4. #4
    coasterbrakelockup lz4005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    parts unknown
    My Bikes
    surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They do. The link below has cruisers with 36" wheels.

    http://www.unicycle.com/shopping/shopexd.asp?id=435


  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,287
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lz4005
    They do. The link below has cruisers with 36" wheels.

    http://www.unicycle.com/shopping/shopexd.asp?id=435

    I like the idea of a larger size wheel for touring. Those cruisers are probably very comfortable. The larger the wheel, the more plush the ride. It's unfortunate the only bike in production with a larger wheel is a beach cruiser.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bikes have been made with wheels ranging from about size 16 to size 70 inches. Today, in the USA, most wheels use tires sized at about 20 inches, 24 inches, 26 inches, and 27 inches.

    But, without doubt, 28 inch tires have been the best seller. Around 1900, Raleigh began making the DL-1 with 28 inch tires. Until around 1970, that model, and its clones, were best sellers both and in the USA. That British three-speed bike that Americans called "an English Racer".

    And, today, in India and Africa, hundreds of millions of people contine to ride the DL-1. Available new in India for around $50. Available new in the USA from "Yellow Jersey" for around $300.

    From a pure "theory" point of view, twenty inch wheels are the best. A BMX wheel with 48 spokes, and wide, beefy 20 inch rim ain't NEVER going out of true. People ride these wheels off a twenty foot high roof, and land on concrete - neither their "IQ", nor the rim has gotten any smaller. Both are quite small, before, and after.

    Dahon builds folding bikes for folks were are NBA height using these wheels. They can fold-up small enough to put your bike in a suitcase or in a backpack. Bents using these wheels would leave Lance in their dust.

    But, sheep are sheep. Mountain bikes will continue to use 26 inch tires. Road bikes will use 27 inch/700c whees. Logic has nothing to do with how people spend their money.

  7. #7
    coasterbrakelockup lz4005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    parts unknown
    My Bikes
    surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
    I like the idea of a larger size wheel for touring. Those cruisers are probably very comfortable. The larger the wheel, the more plush the ride. It's unfortunate the only bike in production with a larger wheel is a beach cruiser.
    The down side would be that they will be more difficult to stop, what with the added rolling momentum of more tire farther away from the hub. Which is another consideration for wheels in general not being larger than they are.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,287
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
    But, sheep are sheep. Mountain bikes will continue to use 26 inch tires. Road bikes will use 27 inch/700c whees. Logic has nothing to do with how people spend their money.
    You should never mountain bike with a 20 inch wheel which is why Dahon never made one that size. It's too dangerous and uncomfortable for mountain biking. I have a 20 inch wheel bike and it's less comfortable than a 26' or 27' inch tire by far. Furthermore, the smaller tires slips into cracks and pot holes which makes riding more dangerous at night or even during the day. Trust me.. I have a battle scars from falling off my folding bikes. Last, the smaller tire (especially the rear wheel) wears out faster than a 700 cc tire.

    The 20' inch wheel is far from perfect.

  9. #9
    Senior Member randya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    in bed with your mom
    My Bikes
    who cares?
    Posts
    13,696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought there were some mountain bikes being made with 29" front wheels and 26" rear wheels, similar to the wheel size ratio of off road motorcyles.

  10. #10
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by randya
    I thought there were some mountain bikes being made with 29" front wheels and 26" rear wheels, similar to the wheel size ratio of off road motorcyles.
    I don't know of any MTBs that have mixed size 29"/26" wheels. However, also bear in mind that 29" wheels is a marketting term for 700c sized MTB wheels. A 29" MTB wheel uses a standard 622mm rim size.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    5,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve
    You should never mountain bike with a 20 inch wheel which is why Dahon never made one that size. It's too dangerous and uncomfortable for mountain biking. I have a 20 inch wheel bike and it's less comfortable than a 26' or 27' inch tire by far. Furthermore, the smaller tires slips into cracks and pot holes which makes riding more dangerous at night or even during the day. Trust me.. I have a battle scars from falling off my folding bikes. Last, the smaller tire (especially the rear wheel) wears out faster than a 700 cc tire.

    The 20' inch wheel is far from perfect.
    I gave my eight year old nephew a nice BMX bike with HUGE tires on wide 20 inch rims. He doesn't like "to share", but I take it for short rides. The seatpost and stem work for him, and not for me. But the wheels and tires could go anywhere, anytime, with any rider.

    I have waaay too many bike with umpteen gears and 26 inch and 27 inch tires. I envy my nephew's joy in riding his one speed BMX bike with those "go anywhere" wheels and tires. His bike can take anything an eight year old boy can imagine (and they can imagine doing stuff that gives adults nightmares). Some of my road bike wheels could go "out of true" if I just THINK about the stuff BMX riders get away with.

  12. #12
    totally louche Bekologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    A land that time forgot
    My Bikes
    the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
    Posts
    18,026
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Umm, Gary Fisher makes some mountain bikes with 29" wheels and has been for a few years. Edited to say, why doesn't he just call these 700c mountain bikes, maybe they'd catch on better?
    Last edited by Bekologist; 12-29-04 at 08:56 PM.

  13. #13
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lz4005
    They do. The link below has cruisers with 36" wheels.
    Radical! I hate to have to find tubes or tires for that thing though.

    Cheers,
    Blake

  14. #14
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bekologist
    Umm, Gary Fisher makes some mountain bikes with 29" wheels and has been for a few years. Edited to say, why doesn't he just call these 700c mountain bikes, maybe they'd catch on better?
    Because then the "hardcore" MTBers would just cry, "d00d... that's a cyclocross bike with straight handlebars and I'm too manly for that!"
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  15. #15
    Toyota Racing Dev. PWRDbyTRD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knoxville, TN baby!
    My Bikes
    2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux
    Posts
    3,336
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    maybe 26" or 700c wheels are a good medium between size and weight. Bigger wheels will weigh more, right?
    Linkage...My 2004 Kona Hoss Dee-Lux My Mindless Banter
    Disclaimer: I'm 425lb...I put unnormal loads on my bike. This should help you in answering any of my questions.

  16. #16
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    But, sheep are sheep. Mountain bikes will continue to use 26 inch tires. Road bikes will use 27 inch/700c whees. Logic has nothing to do with how people spend their money.
    Wow, thats a well thought out statement. I can think of many reasons bigger wheels make no sense. Sheep nothing, bigger wheels don't make sense in dh, fr, street and a lot of xc. They have a place but a small one. Heck I run a 24" wheel on my one bike for strength and acceleration purposes.

    Why does everyone believe there should be one way, variety, especially in the case of wheels, makes the most sense.

    Because then the "hardcore" MTBers would just cry, "d00d... that's a cyclocross bike with straight handlebars and I'm too manly for that!"
    That and I would probably fold the wheel in 2 on my first 7 ft drop.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,419
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ever since the Rover Safety Bicycle, wheel diameter has been separated from gear size, so it is really an issue of what size will fit the frame. You use the largest size possible to reduce rolling resistance. the limit being the length of the head tube and toe clip overlap
    The 700c/27" size is the largest wheel that can be fitted into a normal size frame. There has been some rationalisation, so all the various 27" sizes are now reduced to a standard 700c .
    700c does not work in the smaller sizes of road frame, hence the need for 26" wheels (650c).

    With MTBs, the 26" was a historical accident. I dont see how it can be the ideal wheel size for every off-road rider. A 6'6" rider could use fat tyre 700c (29"), and a very small rider could use 24" and they would both have a wheel which sits happily in their frame with plenty of clearance. Small kids use 26" MTbs off road, and they are using big wheels for their size.

  18. #18
    coasterbrakelockup lz4005's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    parts unknown
    My Bikes
    surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
    Posts
    825
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake
    Radical! I hate to have to find tubes or tires for that thing though.
    The bikes are made by/for a sub-division of car tire manufacturer Coker, which also sells the tires, rims and tubes. I have no idea why they started making them, but the bikes do look cool. Unicyclers like using the big wheels on their touring rigs because that is the only way for them to get (what we would call) a higher gear ratio. Also, unicyclers are...different.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,975
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gpsblake
    Someone asked me this today and I didn't have an answer. Probably a stupid question but oh well, let me ask it.

    Why don't they make bikes with tires larger than 27"? I would think someone in great condition would go faster on a 31" tire with the same gear ratios and such. I'm just curious the reason why tires pretty much stopped at 27 inches.
    I think there are a number of considerations.

    The first has to do with building the rest of the bike. With larger tires you will encounter toe overlap with the front wheel sooner and have to do all of the things that manufacturers do today in order to avoid that on bikes with very small frames.

    So far as using smaller wheels is concerned, I heard somewhere that rolling resistance starts going up rapidly when wheel size drops below about 24 inches.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •