Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-21-12, 06:41 AM   #1
chico1st
30mi/day commuter
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
kenda tubes vs specialized (or more general)

I have a number of cheap kenda tubes and some relatively expensive Specialized tubes.
They are both their entry level tubes so I was wondering if there is a different in them. I have to pay 4x as much for the Specialized.

Are the specialized supposed to be lighter or have better quality control?

Also does this apply to all bike tube companies.

In my mind if the tube is thicker its just a bit more puncture resistant which is fine in my books and I've nver had one come with a puncture.
chico1st is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-12, 07:21 AM   #2
wahoonc
Senior Member
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
Posts: 16,687
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I use Schwalbe tubes on my daily riders and long haul bikes. The neighborhood cruisers get what ever is on sale. I suspect there isn't much difference between a Kenda and Specialized other than the fact you are paying for the name and all the advertising for Specialized. Quite often the manufacturer's name will be on the tube and it doesn't match the name on the box.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-12, 08:57 AM   #3
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 19,640
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 433 Post(s)
For puncture resistance thru greater thickness of inner tube ,
ask for Heavy-duty , Thorn -Resistant tubes much thicker,
retain air much longer too..
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-12, 06:48 AM   #4
Garfield Cat
Senior Member
 
Garfield Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Posts: 6,015
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Here's something from Sheldon Brown's web page on inner tubes:

Butyl vs Latex
Before World War II, tires and tubes were made from natural latex rubber, harvested from tropical trees. When the supply of natural latex was insecure during the war, a substitute, "butyl" was invented. Butyl turned out to be a very successful substitute, better, in fact, than latex for this application. All modern tires and most inner tubes use butyl rubber.

Some riders prefer latex inner tubes, because they can be a bit lighter than butyl ones. Some riders believe that latex tubes have less rolling resistance than butyl.

Latex tubes are commonly a bit more porous than butyl ones, and need to have their pressure topped off more often.
Garfield Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-12, 09:55 PM   #5
MAK
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Delaware
Bikes: Yes, I have bikes.
Posts: 1,039
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Are you comparing apples to apples? Some tubes are certainly thicker (heavy duty and/or thorn resistant) and some are ultra light and designed for racing.

Bicycle Magazine had an article a while ago in which they opined that tubes are tubes (when comparing similar types) and that the cost or manufacturer makes little difference. They recommended buying the cheapest tubes available. The only tubes I've had a problem with are Performance/Forte tubes because I don't think the presta valves are very durable and I question the quality control due to some splitting. I use either Specialized or Bontrager tubes and have had good luck with each. Both are only $5.00 and cheaper when the LBS runs a sale.
MAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-12, 10:51 PM   #6
GP 
Senior Member
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 7,582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
I buy generic tubes and light tubes. If I change a tube at home, I use a generic tube. I fold the light tubes as tight as possible and carry them in my seatbag or pocket for roadside emergencies.

In my experience, the light tubes are just as good as regular weight tubes for puncture resistance. The ultra light tubes aren't as good.
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.