Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    771
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    How do I figure gearing comparisons between a compact and a triple?

    I have a new bike with a compact crankset, and I was wondering which gear combos are the equivalents to what I was doing on the triple.

    Is there a chart or something for this somewhere online?

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  3. #3
    don't try this at home. rm -rf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    N. KY
    Posts
    2,737
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    To compare one chainring at a time, try Mike Sherman's Gear Calculator. All the charts and graphs update on the fly as you make changes, so it's easy to make comparisons.

    Scroll down to see the Speed over RPM Range chart, with each chainring in a different color. And farther down, see the Speed at X RPM table.

    For instance, you can compare a 30 chainring from a triple to a 34 compact chainring: Here's a 12-27 cog set, with 30, 34, and 50 chainrings: Link to that setup

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    5,068
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Or just calculate the ratio between the front and rear gears. For example 53/19 = 2.79. This is approximately equivalent to 50/18 = 2.78.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Retro Grouch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    St Peters, Missouri
    My Bikes
    Rans Enduro Sport, Hase Kettweisel Tandem, Merin Bear Valley beater bike
    Posts
    23,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Chainring teeth divided by rear cog teeth times wheel diameter in inches.

    Using a pocket calculator I can calculate an entire drivetrain about as quickly as I can look them up on a table and I can usually find a calculator faster than I can look up a table.

    It's kind of an interesting process. Whenever I've checked out a number of alternative drive trains that I was considering, one has always jumped out as right for me.

    One thing that I think gets frequently overlooked is the flat road gear. It's nice to have your favorite flat road gear fall in the middle of the cassette. That way you have a couple of trim gears in each direction without having to shift front chainrings.

  6. #6
    Rustbelt Rider mkeller234's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, OH
    My Bikes
    1990 Trek 1420 - 1978 Raleigh Professional - 1973 Schwinn Collegiate - 1974 Schwinn Suburban
    Posts
    8,265
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I personally like this one for it's easy to use/understand interface:

    http://www.gear-calculator.com/#
    |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||
    |......GO.BROWNS........| ||'|";, ___.
    |_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] -
    "(@)'(@)"""''"**|(@)(@)*****''(@)

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,519
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the Sheldon Brown gear calculator http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/index.html

    As a real rough rule of thumb: if you have the same cassette in back, you will have more than one, probably closer to two less low gears if that makes sense.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Simon Cowbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    PNW
    My Bikes
    Ti Lite and a Vaya
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mkeller234 View Post
    I personally like this one for it's easy to use/understand interface:

    http://www.gear-calculator.com/#
    That's the one. You can set it up to compare drives.
    Like so:
    http://www.gear-calculator.com/#KB=2...5&UF=2205&SL=2

  9. #9
    7-speed doomsday prepper ThermionicScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CID
    My Bikes
    1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX
    Posts
    8,773
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
    One thing that I think gets frequently overlooked is the flat road gear. It's nice to have your favorite flat road gear fall in the middle of the cassette. That way you have a couple of trim gears in each direction without having to shift front chainrings.
    +1. On paper (or the Internet tool of your choice), the range offered by different schemes might look great, but the cross-chaining and front-shifting needed to work around your cruising gear might be really heinous in practice. (I'm thinking of the compact double here. )
    Quote Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
    There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
    RUSA #7498

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    771
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So, a gear ratio of 1.5 would be harder to pedal than a combo that is 1.25?

  11. #11
    7-speed doomsday prepper ThermionicScott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CID
    My Bikes
    1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX
    Posts
    8,773
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by lungimsam View Post
    So, a gear ratio of 1.5 would be harder to pedal than a combo that is 1.25?
    Yes. "Harder" but the wheel moves more for each crank revolution.
    Quote Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
    There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
    RUSA #7498

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    294
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Camilo View Post
    I like the Sheldon Brown gear calculator http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/index.html

    As a real rough rule of thumb: if you have the same cassette in back, you will have more than one, probably closer to two less low gears if that makes sense.
    I like Sheldon's 'gain ratio' concept too which you can select on his calculator http://sheldonbrown.com/gain.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •