Is 10 minutes a good time for 10km on an exercise bike?
09-03-12, 06:14 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is 10 minutes a good time for 10km on an exercise bike?
I don't go on the exercise bike much as I prefer real cycling. But when I do I want to get it over with asap while at the same time getting a good workout. So I set it up at a nice round, matching number: 10km in 10 mins. I'm absolutely exhausted for about 5 minutes after I finish with the legs feeling like jelly but I'm ok in about 10 minutes. I would describe myself as at an average fitness level.
My aim is to improve my general road cycling ability. Is it better to do longer and less intensive workouts or is the above method better?
My aim is to improve my general road cycling ability. Is it better to do longer and less intensive workouts or is the above method better?
09-03-12, 06:55 PM
#2
Senior Member
imho - 60 kph (10 kph in 10 min) is pretty optimistic - i'd check the bike's calibration ?
09-03-12, 07:02 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 2,844
Bikes: '13 Spech Roubaix SL4 Expert
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
09-03-12, 07:45 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852
Bikes: Click on the #YOLO
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible.
__________________
Shimano : Click :: Campy : Snap :: SRAM : Bang
Shimano : Click :: Campy : Snap :: SRAM : Bang
09-03-12, 07:46 PM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: 2012 Surly LHT, 1995 GT Outpost Trail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What kind of exercise bike?
Not that it matters really, I've never seen an exercise bike that even approaches reality in its reported numbers. Hell, mine says I can average 25mph, up mountains. Reality doesn't agree.
Not that it matters really, I've never seen an exercise bike that even approaches reality in its reported numbers. Hell, mine says I can average 25mph, up mountains. Reality doesn't agree.
09-03-12, 08:04 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
The atmosphere on Mars is quite thin. Might be you dialed up the Mars setting.
09-04-12, 06:19 AM
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know how to check if the calibration is accurate but all the settings work fine. It's a body sculpture machine. I did mention I'm absolutely knackered afterwards and it does feel I've done 10km! I don't race for any team, I'm not that good!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
09-04-12, 06:20 AM
#9
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
If you had fun then it was a good time. I always try to have a good time on my bike.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
09-06-12, 12:58 PM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Don't stop now. Go for the full hour, you may have something there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour_record
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour_record
09-06-12, 01:09 PM
#12
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
09-06-12, 01:09 PM
#13
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
I don't know how to check if the calibration is accurate but all the settings work fine. It's a body sculpture machine. I did mention I'm absolutely knackered afterwards and it does feel I've done 10km! I don't race for any team, I'm not that good!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
09-06-12, 01:45 PM
#14
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
09-06-12, 02:05 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't know how to check if the calibration is accurate but all the settings work fine. It's a body sculpture machine. I did mention I'm absolutely knackered afterwards and it does feel I've done 10km! I don't race for any team, I'm not that good!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
You say you want to improve "general road cycling ability". Are you talking about endurance and/or speed?
Last edited by CbadRider; 09-06-12 at 02:11 PM. Reason: spelling
09-06-12, 04:13 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
The notion of "speed" on an exercise bike is bizarre. I can understand evaluating speed on the expensive trainers which provide a complete simulation of grade and load taking into account grade, wind velocity, wind resistance (drag), etc., but these don't seem to be found in spin rooms and you would have to be a dedicated amateur living in a sketchy climate (most of the US?) to own one.
09-06-12, 08:56 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The notion of "speed" on an exercise bike is bizarre. I can understand evaluating speed on the expensive trainers which provide a complete simulation of grade and load taking into account grade, wind velocity, wind resistance (drag), etc., but these don't seem to be found in spin rooms and you would have to be a dedicated amateur living in a sketchy climate (most of the US?) to own one.
He's actually not asking about the bike, he's asking about his workout: "My aim is to improve my general road cycling ability. Is it better to do longer and less intensive workouts or is the above method better?"
09-07-12, 05:39 AM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 533
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
60 km/h ,... either you are a stronger cyclist than any of us and should consider going pro, or something is not right here.
About the original question, I am not sure what your goal is and i am not a professional trainer. However, if your goal is to become a stronger cyclist and improve overall fitness, I feel like 10 minutes is a ridiculously short time to do any sort of exercise. I also wonder if you go all out withut any sort of warming up. Not sure if that is a good thing. My warmups take 15 minutes...
If you want to become a better cyclist, get rollers and vary your indoor exercizes imho. Personally an hour is the absolute minimum for me. If you enjoy short bursts of high energy training and feel like you benefit from it, then do interval training. Read up on how to do it in a responsible way or get tips from someone knowledgeable.
About the original question, I am not sure what your goal is and i am not a professional trainer. However, if your goal is to become a stronger cyclist and improve overall fitness, I feel like 10 minutes is a ridiculously short time to do any sort of exercise. I also wonder if you go all out withut any sort of warming up. Not sure if that is a good thing. My warmups take 15 minutes...
If you want to become a better cyclist, get rollers and vary your indoor exercizes imho. Personally an hour is the absolute minimum for me. If you enjoy short bursts of high energy training and feel like you benefit from it, then do interval training. Read up on how to do it in a responsible way or get tips from someone knowledgeable.
09-07-12, 06:31 AM
#20
Senior Member
If you could do 36 mph on a level road for ten minutes, I'd be impressed. On an exercise bike, it's just a number on a chart with no scale.
09-07-12, 01:31 PM
#21
Senior Member
Where does and exercise bike go ? No where.
09-07-12, 02:19 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I teach a spin class on Keiser bikes with computers that are calibrated on a regular basis. One of my classes has the students ride as fast as they can for 5 minutes and track the distance to calculate their speed. I can ride 3-3.2 miles in that time, which is 36+ mph. The resistance is very low and the bikes have a big flywheel that carries the pedal momentum. Most students in the class who aren't cyclists can easily do over 25 mph in 5 minutes.
09-07-12, 02:25 PM
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,445
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4234 Post(s)
Liked 2,949 Times
in
1,808 Posts
Plus, doesn't that leave marks on the floor? I mean without wheels and all dragging those things around so much seems like it'd scrap the hell out of the floor.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
09-07-12, 02:34 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I mean, the computer can calculate power (in several ways, but ultimately all based on how fast something is spinning vs. the resistance seen) and then use that look up a speed on a chart or with a formula that gives the speed of a cyclist of a given weight in a given position (probably down in the drops on a race bike) on level ground at close to sea level with that power production.
To make it even fancier, you could have the computer ask your weight first so to be more accurate.
There's no reason this has to be expensive -- the only expensive part would be that the power reading would need to be accurate, and so depending on how it's done it may require periodic recalibration.
All this said ... I don't know how many exercise bikes do this. Certainly, for the ones I've used they tend to give me a speed rating that's significantly higher than I get on a real bike. Even with the expensive ones.
I wish I was as fast as the exercise bike at work says I am!
09-07-12, 04:34 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I don't know how to check if the calibration is accurate but all the settings work fine. It's a body sculpture machine. I did mention I'm absolutely knackered afterwards and it does feel I've done 10km! I don't race for any team, I'm not that good!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!
"Exercise bike folks. No wind and questionable rolling resistance. I'd say 60kph is feasible" Thats what I was thinking. Then 60kph = 37mph so it does seem a bit optimistic come to think of it!