Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-12, 01:47 AM   #1
puregsr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What kind of bottom bracket is this? (PIC)

My first modern bike. Can somebody tell me what kind of bottom bracket is this? Octalink? Cuz the seller told me it's cup and cone.

Ritchey compact crankset 50/34

Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1050868.jpg (87.2 KB, 67 views)

Last edited by puregsr; 10-15-12 at 02:32 AM.
puregsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 07:10 AM   #2
Lightingguy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Bikes:
Posts: 625
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes, cup and cone, not Octalink or ISIS. So probably either a ball-bearing retainer design, or loose bb's.
Lightingguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 07:39 AM   #3
DieselDan
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger
Posts: 8,521
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Old school cup and cone. Serviceable and reliable enough. Can be replaced with a cartridge unit.
DieselDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 09:38 AM   #4
ThermionicScott 
Gratuitous glib and snark
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)
Posts: 13,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
The kind I like.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 10:35 AM   #5
LarDasse74
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Posts: 3,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
THe spindle likely uses the older squate taper BB/crank interface. If you remove the crank-fixing bolt you can see the end of the spindle and figure out for sure what type it is. Be sure to firmy re-tighten the bolt before riding.
LarDasse74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 10:48 AM   #6
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 18,781
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 214 Post(s)
Why do you ask, does it need replacement?
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 01:40 PM   #7
puregsr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It feels like my chainline is kind of messed up. Ritchey compact double (50/34) and 10 speed 105 cogs (12-27).
Pedaling in small chainring and largest cog, large chainring would occasionally rub and catch the chain. Not sure if it's an adjustment issue or not. Quick measurement shows that it might be 2mm off the presumed 43.5mm chainline.
puregsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 01:48 PM   #8
BlazingPedals
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, homebuilt recumbent
Posts: 8,799
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
They don't make bottom brackets in 1mm increments. If you're only 2mm off from the ideal, then you're about as close as you're going to get. Most likely, you'll just have to tweak either the limit screw or the cable tension.
BlazingPedals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 02:36 PM   #9
LarDasse74
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Posts: 3,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals View Post
They don't make bottom brackets in 1mm increments. If you're only 2mm off from the ideal, then you're about as close as you're going to get. Most likely, you'll just have to tweak either the limit screw or the cable tension.
It is hard to tell if this is the case for the OP, but there are some BBs that can be adjusted by loosening lockrings on both sides and threading the BB to one side or the other. However, if the pedals are close to centred in the frame, 2mm will not make enough af a difference (and is likely within most peoples' ability to measure chainline) to go tot he trouble.

Also, that is kind of a weird setup - unless it is an aftermarket boutique BB, you normally only find cup-and-cone BB shells designed for splined BB tools on the cheapest of the cheap bikes. I suspect there is either a parts mismatch (cups from one style of BB kludged to work with another style), it is not a cup-and-cone BB, or someone has gone out of their way to take an ultra-cheap cup-and-cone BB from a X-Mart bike to install on this (apparently) decent aluminum road bike. Or perhaps it is a BB designed for a 73mm shell and the lock ring was added to cover up the extra exposed threads.
LarDasse74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 03:02 PM   #10
ThermionicScott 
Gratuitous glib and snark
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)
Posts: 13,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by puregsr View Post
It feels like my chainline is kind of messed up. Ritchey compact double (50/34) and 10 speed 105 cogs (12-27).
Pedaling in small chainring and largest cog, large chainring would occasionally rub and catch the chain. Not sure if it's an adjustment issue or not. Quick measurement shows that it might be 2mm off the presumed 43.5mm chainline.
The chain should be nowhere close to the big chainring when you are in the small ring and the largest cog. Do you mean that you are in the smallest cog in the rear, and so the highest gear available when in the small ring? That's a common problem due to the size difference between the 50T and 34T chainrings, and one of several reasons you should be in the larger chainring at that point.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 03:04 PM   #11
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Posts: 16,360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazingPedals View Post
They don't make bottom brackets in 1mm increments. If you're only 2mm off from the ideal, then you're about as close as you're going to get.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarDasse74 View Post
It is hard to tell if this is the case for the OP, but there are some BBs that can be adjusted by loosening lockrings on both sides and threading the BB to one side or the other.
Not likely on a cup & cone type bottom bracket. But looking at the OP's picture, if the problem is that the chainrings are too close to the frame, there does appear to be room for at least a 1mm spacer under the fixed cup to move the arm out. If the problem is that the chainrings are too far away, the OP would need a shorter spindle.
JohnDThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 03:21 PM   #12
puregsr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 23
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott View Post
The chain should be nowhere close to the big chainring when you are in the small ring and the largest cog. Do you mean that you are in the smallest cog in the rear, and so the highest gear available when in the small ring? That's a common problem due to the size difference between the 50T and 34T chainrings, and one of several reasons you should be in the larger chainring at that point.
I meant when I'm in 34 front and 12 back. I know to avoid this combo, but just think it's kind of odd that this is a common problem with compact doubles.
puregsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 04:08 PM   #13
LarDasse74
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Posts: 3,769
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson View Post
Not likely on a cup & cone type bottom bracket.
I have serious doubts that this is a cup&cone BB.
LarDasse74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 09:24 PM   #14
rdtompki
Senior Member
 
rdtompki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture
Posts: 3,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by puregsr View Post
I meant when I'm in 34 front and 12 back. I know to avoid this combo, but just think it's kind of odd that this is a common problem with compact doubles.
I don't think this is unusual and this combination is discouraged on compact setups. Whether or not you get an actual rub is a function of the chainline and chainstay length.
rdtompki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-12, 09:25 PM   #15
ThermionicScott 
Gratuitous glib and snark
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)
Posts: 13,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by puregsr View Post
I meant when I'm in 34 front and 12 back. I know to avoid this combo, but just think it's kind of odd that this is a common problem with compact doubles.
The idea with compact doubles is that the big ring is used with the whole range of the cassette for most of your riding, and the small ring is used with the bigger cogs when you have a hill to climb. It's been common wisdom throughout the decades to avoid the big-big and small-small combos, but with today's flexible chains it's more of an annoyance.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 AM.