Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Walmart bike rider gpsblake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,681
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    29" vs 26" bicycles, what difference will I feel?

    I was thinking my next bike might be a 29er. I do most of the riding on roads including some paved roads here. I don't ride trails or technicial courses. I just like to know if there are any minuses or pluses between the 26 inch and 29 inch.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator no1mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NE OK
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Smoke
    Posts
    8,068
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Before anyone tries to fill your head with preconceptions based upon their personal experiences/bias, do this:

    -Take your current bike to your favorite LBS or whichever shop you are considering buying from.
    -Find out what their 'test loop' is like- hopefully it's just not around the parking lot. They may look at you odd when you ask...
    -Ride your current one on that test loop.
    -Ride their 29er on the same route.
    -Report back your findings .

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Biggest difference I feel on a 29er, is my uh 'man parts' hurt if I ever come off the saddle; they don't make 29ers for short people. You're at least 6' tall right?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,420
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    29ers are 700c rims with fat tyres. I use 700c x32mm for loaded touring on logging trails. I would have preferred a 38mm but 32 is fine unloaded.
    29ers are for bigger riders not smaller ones.
    I use 26 on my urban runabout with Big Apple ballon tyres. Both sizes work for me but I prefer the 26 for rougher urban cobbles and potholes and 700c for longer rides on tarmac.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Looigi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,614
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My 26 vs 29 experience is on MTBs, and I don't really notice a big diff, maybe slightly smoother over rough surfaces. The main diff is with the same gearing, the 29er is effectively a 12% higher gear, which can be significant on really steep stuff. Also, from a cosmetic pov, they make small guys look even smaller.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    My Bikes
    Crossrip Elite, Bikesdirect tarck bike custom build
    Posts
    155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    From what you said, you want a road bike or a hybrid bike, not a 29er. Of course, as noted before, a 29er is just a bike with 700c wheels, which 90% of all hybrids and road bikes are anyway.
    馬好き

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    3,749
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xenologer View Post
    Biggest difference I feel on a 29er, is my uh 'man parts' hurt if I ever come off the saddle; they don't make 29ers for short people. You're at least 6' tall right?
    My wife is 5'1" and rides a 29er with no problems.

  8. #8
    PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes dynaryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    dropped and lost in Washington DC
    Posts
    6,237
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Safari and Pt Reyes both have 26x2" tires. I had a 29er Crosstrail with 2" tires. Noticeably more effort needed to spin up the bigger hoops/tires in city traffic. Was fun for bombing around the rough roads,but in the end I decided if I wanted to run fat tires I'd stick with 26".

    C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport/Qualifier,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L

  9. #9
    Certified Bike Brat Burton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec
    Posts
    4,203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A 29er ISN'T just a hybrid or road bike with fat tires. The rim size might be 700 but the rim width is typically wider on a 29er because of the larger tire size. You'd also be hard pressed to find a 'normal' hybrid or road bike with enough frame clearance to handle a 2.3" tire.

    So the question is - do you really need that much tire for what you want to do or would a normal hybrid with smaller tires be better suited?

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Velo Dog View Post
    My wife is 5'1" and rides a 29er with no problems.
    What's she riding and whats the standover? Havent found anything yet that fits me.

  11. #11
    Bianchi Goddess Bianchigirll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Camp Hill, PA
    My Bikes
    Too many to list here check my signature.
    Posts
    20,717
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    IMHO unless your off road riding will involve riding through mud and over logs and other obstacles stay away from mountain bikes and 29ers. If your planning to ride mostly on the paved road and hard pack dirt roads and bike trails buy the best hybrid you can afford.

    A hybrid will give you a better ride on the road so if you want to start riding farther it will be more suitable than the other two. A good hybrid will also be strong enough to tolerate dirt roads and trails but no trying to cross obstacles.

    A mountain bike will be heavy and sluggish on the road all the time and 29ers are still new and you won't get as much bike for your money.
    Bianchis '87 Sport SX, '90 Proto, '90 Campione del Fausto Giamondi Specialisma Italiano Mundo, '91 Boarala 'cross, '93 Project 3, '86 Volpe, '97 Ti Megatube, , '90 something Vento 603,

    Others but still loved,; '80 RIGI, '80 Batavus Professional, '87 Cornelo, '09 Motobecane SS, '?? Jane Doe (still on the drawing board), '90ish Haro Escape

  12. #12
    Senior Member buffalowings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xenologer View Post
    What's she riding and whats the standover? Havent found anything yet that fits me.
    700c roadbikes with the right frame size can fit people just a inch or two under 5ft, so no reason a mountain bike frame cannot do the same.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by buffalowings View Post
    700c roadbikes with the right frame size can fit people just a inch or two under 5ft, so no reason a mountain bike frame cannot do the same.
    While I do have roadbikes that fit me; a 29er mtb is going to need more standover clearance since it will be ridden offroad. ie 5" clearances isntead of 2". The fat tires and raised BB also take up 1-2" that would have been frame size as well.
    So far no luck for me.

  14. #14
    Senior Member buffalowings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ah, That makes sense now, the frame should never go below the diameter of the wheel.

  15. #15
    Must... ride... more... Phil_gretz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sterling, VA
    My Bikes
    '77 Fuji S-10S, '82 Fuji Team, '88 Fuji Saratoga, '08 Scattante CFR, '12 Jamis Sputnik, '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT
    Posts
    2,395
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by buffalowings View Post
    ah, That makes sense now, the frame should never go below the diameter of the wheel.
    Huh? Even for MTBs, that formula doesn't work.

    Back to the original question. Your premise doesn't align with your question. You don't sound like you want a 29er MTB if you don't ride off-road and don't ride "technical courses", or general singletrack xc. It makes little difference what anyone says about 26" MTBs or 29" ones. If you want a mountain bike, get one. It just may be the wrong tool for the intended job...

    What's wrong with the bike that you already have?
    Last edited by Phil_gretz; 03-04-13 at 12:10 PM. Reason: spelling

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    St. Cloud, MN
    My Bikes
    Soma Double Cross DC, Salsa Vaya, Redline D440, '87 Schwinn Super Sport
    Posts
    582
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You may want to check out a Jamis Coda
    I do not claim to be a doctor, scientist, genie, bike magician, good looking, or qualified in any way. The contents of my post are opinions and should be taken as such.

  17. #17
    Senior Member IthaDan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    My Bikes
    Click on the #YOLO
    Posts
    4,658
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A lighter wallet.

    Back when I was coming up, there was a [stillborn] attempt to change the prevailing size from 26" to 24". Granted, there are benefits with rolling over small things in your way, but for the most part, it's marketing. IF you absolutely need one and can swing it financially, then by all means- I think we'd all like to see the industry stay strong, but if you're somehow thinking a 29'er will make you faster, save your money. A fast rider is a fast rider no matter what they ride.

    Shimano : Click :: Campy :: Snap :: SRAM : Bang

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •