Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-13, 12:51 PM   #1
-VELOCITY-
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
-VELOCITY-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Bikes: Giant Revel 2 & Loco Fixie "The Marley"
Posts: 1,919
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Comparing 105 and Ultegra

I'm looking to get back into a Road bike. Just wondering if there's a big difference between going with 105 components compared to Ultegra. For someone who rides for fun and exercise with an occasional MS 150 here and there, is Ultegra worth spending the extra money for? OR is that more for those who are more into competitive racing?

Thanks.
-VELOCITY- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 01:14 PM   #2
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 20,416
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 656 Post(s)
Ultegra costs More. both shove the chain, from one sprocket to the other ..

is it worth the money ? IDK you got plenty of Dosh ? it's all relative.

Id be more thinking of the gear range , but its Flat down there so a choice is
Gear ratios.. want them left as is or change to something easier for you, a mere Mortal, to turn

Might not even have to Go Up to the 105 pricepoint to do the task.

now if showing your new bike off to your mates , has made the Jones's harder to keep up with,
then thats another thing..

New Sram road stuff is nice too..Apex, Rival or Red ?
I note they have a new Hydraulic master- Brifter, in the top, Red, group,
it can be set up with a Disc or a rim Brake at the slave end of the setup..

the new Hydraulic Rim Brake looks real interesting. http://www.sram.com/news-articles/why-hydraulic..

Last edited by fietsbob; 05-21-13 at 01:21 PM.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 03:19 PM   #3
dynaryder
PatronSaintOfDiscBrakes
 
dynaryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: BicycleSPACE warehouse in SW Washington DC
Bikes:
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Pro racers can tell the diff,most mere mortals cannot. Shimano trickles their technology down,so today's 105 is better than 5 yr old Ultegra. If two bikes are close,say within $100,of each other in price,and one's 105 and the other Ultegra,then the Ultegra bike might be a better buy(if they didn't lower the other components). But I wouldn't spend $350 or more to get Ultegra unless there were alot of other upgrades as well.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
dynaryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 03:52 PM   #4
Mobile 155
Senior Member
 
Mobile 155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So Cal
Bikes: 72-76 Peugeot, 89 Klein Quantum Road Bike,2011 CF Specialized Tarmac road bike. 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Posts: 3,768
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 292 Post(s)
It is all about smoothness. And you would have to ride for a while to tell. But new 105 is basically one or two generations old Ultegra. Same with Ultegra and Dura Ace. It is the same with SRAM. They all do the job some just do it smoother with less weight. 105 will work as well as Ultegra but Ultegra could feel smoother and be a few grams lighter.
Mobile 155 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 04:24 PM   #5
vanwormer
Junior Member
 
vanwormer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dynaryder makes a good point! I had a Trek with 105 components which provided very smooth and effortless shifting. Last year I bought a new Trek with Ultegra components. The difference is striking - much smoother, quicker, and quieter shifting. But as pointed out above, it depends on what the better shifter is worth to you. If the price is close and you feel like spending some extra money, go for it. Doubtful that it'll make you any quicker, but you might enjoy the ride more.
vanwormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 06:29 PM   #6
cplager
The Recumbent Quant
 
cplager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Norwalk, CT
Bikes: 2012 Cruzbike Sofrider, 2013 Cruzigami Mantis
Posts: 3,018
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanwormer View Post
Dynaryder makes a good point! I had a Trek with 105 components which provided very smooth and effortless shifting. Last year I bought a new Trek with Ultegra components. The difference is striking - much smoother, quicker, and quieter shifting. But as pointed out above, it depends on what the better shifter is worth to you. If the price is close and you feel like spending some extra money, go for it. Doubtful that it'll make you any quicker, but you might enjoy the ride more.
I'll just point out that you're apparently comparing old 105s to new Ultegra. If that's what you're doing, you might even find that new 105s would be nicer than old Ultegras.

That doesn't invalidate your point, however. To the OP, if you really want to know, ride both. For most of us, the difference is small.
cplager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 08:46 PM   #7
-VELOCITY-
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
-VELOCITY-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Bikes: Giant Revel 2 & Loco Fixie "The Marley"
Posts: 1,919
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks everyone. I appreciate your feedback. I guess an actual bike test is in order. What I'm looking for is durability and reliability, not so much for the swag. I really don't care to impress anyone.
-VELOCITY- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-13, 08:53 PM   #8
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,739
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
How thinly can you slice the baloney?

Shimano makes 5 road component groups. They all do the same thing so it's about smoothness and crispness. I have to move up or down 2 component groups before I feel like I can sense a difference.
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 11:09 AM   #9
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 20,416
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 656 Post(s)
back to the Original Question.. [Sticker Shock alert]

a bike with a 105 Group-set will push you well past U$D $999.00..
You dont have to go that high to get a decent bike..

Pick your Favorite Bike shop, & go test ride bikes..

Last edited by fietsbob; 05-22-13 at 11:09 PM.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 11:57 AM   #10
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Bikes: Rans Rockst (Retro rocket) Rans Enduro Sport (Retro racket) Catrike 559, Merin Bear Valley (beater bike).
Posts: 26,739
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY- View Post
Just wondering if there's a big difference between going with 105 components compared to Ultegra.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch View Post
I have to move up or down 2 component groups before I feel like I can sense a difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
^^^no Idea about why this has anything to do about this
How does that not answer OP's question?
Retro Grouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 06:17 PM   #11
martianone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern VT
Bikes: recumbent & upright
Posts: 1,884
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
IMHO, 105 or ultega isn't so much the question - it is the whole component configuration and bike fit.
Based upon the type of riding OP indicates he does, a slightly relaxed frame geometry could made more sense. Good fit is a key component. Ultega RD and shifter with a clunky wheel set and generic brakes probably.isn't any advantage over 105 set up with comparable components and.wheels.
martianone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 08:27 PM   #12
Burton
Certified Bike Brat
 
Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Bikes:
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The difference is small and lots of people will tell you 105 is very suitable for racing. Personally I'd upgrade a wheel-set and drivetrain before shifters.
Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 08:43 PM   #13
GP 
Senior Member
 
GP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 7,582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Make sure the bike has full 105 or full Ultegra. For example, Bikedirect has a titanium bike that says "Ultegra 6700" but if you look closely it has an FSA crank and Cane Creek brakes.

As far as 105 versus Ultegra, I've had good experience with both. The only non-crash problem I've had with either is a broken 105 shifter and that was after 11K miles. That was 9-speed, not the newer stuff.
GP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 11:16 PM   #14
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 20,416
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 656 Post(s)
Well RG
Quote:
Originally Posted by fietsbob^^^no Idea about why this has anything to do about this..
the Moderators talking down the previous OT post, critiquing Tiffany's shop's pricing policy was deleted.
sort of messing with reply context.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-13, 11:41 PM   #15
cruiserhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,869
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY- View Post
I'm looking to get back into a Road bike. Just wondering if there's a big difference between going with 105 components compared to Ultegra. For someone who rides for fun and exercise with an occasional MS 150 here and there, is Ultegra worth spending the extra money for? OR is that more for those who are more into competitive racing?

Thanks.
105 and save your money. Period.

105 is, in fact, premium componentry.

When you look at road bikes and the various strata of prices and performance points, 105 is in the top tier.
It shares design and tech with the two top groups Shimano makes.

It will sacrifice weight and take some other cost-cutting measures compared to DA and Ultegra but still very high quality.

For durability and performance, you don't need anything more for what you're doing.
A lot of people run 105, even for high mileage and racing. Absolutely nothing wrong with it.
cruiserhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-13, 05:53 PM   #16
-VELOCITY-
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
-VELOCITY-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Bikes: Giant Revel 2 & Loco Fixie "The Marley"
Posts: 1,919
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thank you for the continued input. Very much appreciated. I actually got to visit my new LBS. They have some nice Fuji Road Bikes. The "entry" level bike basically had SORA components. To get into the 105 group, I would have to go with the full carbon bike. Which really put me out of my budget. So I'm going to visit a few more stores to open up my options. I previously had a Trek 1000 with a mix of SORA and TIAGRA components. Can't say they ever let me down. I had put several thousand miles on it before selling it. (Which I still regret to this day. I thought I wasn't going to get back into cycling). So I want to see some Giants, Specialized, Cannondales, and whatever else it out there to get an idea of what I'll settle with. My budget is $800.00 max. At this point I'd even consider previously owned as long as it's in good shape.
-VELOCITY- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-13, 07:55 AM   #17
Phil_gretz
Journeyman Bike Commuter
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: '88 Fuji Saratoga, '12 Jamis Sputnik, '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '16 Motobecane Gran Premio Elite
Posts: 3,862
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
I recently put new (take offs) Tiagra 3 x 9 on my wife's touring bike. The shifting was very smooth and accurate. Someone had upgraded/discarded these and I thought I'd try them.

In the end, wife went back to barcons. I' m definitely keeping the Tiagra STIs and derailleurs for a future build for myself. Bottom line: Tiagra is fine. Buy a frame geometry that works, well fit from a friendly shop. Don't think twice about component level. Makes little difference. PG
Phil_gretz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-13, 11:27 AM   #18
LarryMelman
Senior Member
 
LarryMelman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Bikes:
Posts: 593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY- View Post
To get into the 105 group, I would have to go with the full carbon bike. Which really put me out of my budget.
It really is a shame how Fuji has downgraded their components so much. My 2008 Roubaix RC came with Ultegra shifters and rear derailleur, and 105 front derailleur. Within a couple years, it simply was not possible to get Ultegra with an aluminum frame, 105 was the best they offered. Now you can't even get 105?
LarryMelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-13, 12:11 PM   #19
cruiserhead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,869
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
that kind of product offering is across the board. Fuji is actually a value compared to others.
cruiserhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-13, 11:47 PM   #20
Dunbar
Senior Member
 
Dunbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Bikes: Roubaix SL4 Expert , Cervelo S2
Posts: 2,954
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz View Post
In the end, wife went back to barcons. I' m definitely keeping the Tiagra STIs and derailleurs for a future build for myself.
I have Tiagra (4600) on my new townie bike and 105 (5700) on my carbon fiber road bike. Both shift very well but the Tiagra is smoother and lower effort. It feels very similar to the 9sp 105 (5500) shifters on my old bike. I've heard that since both cables run under the bar tape on the 105 it increases the cable friction. I do prefer the larger hoods on 105 and the front shifter is a little clunkier on Tiagra (but it's not a big deal.)

I've always heard conflicting tales on 105 vs Ultegra. Some people use both and say they can't tell a difference. Others say they can. On my bike there was a $600-700 price difference so it made it pretty easy for me to pick 105.

Last edited by Dunbar; 05-26-13 at 11:51 PM.
Dunbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 03:40 PM   #21
david58
Senior Member
 
david58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Bikes: Fuji Cross Comp, BMC SR02
Posts: 1,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP View Post
Make sure the bike has full 105 or full Ultegra. For example, Bikedirect has a titanium bike that says "Ultegra 6700" but if you look closely it has an FSA crank and Cane Creek brakes.

As far as 105 versus Ultegra, I've had good experience with both. The only non-crash problem I've had with either is a broken 105 shifter and that was after 11K miles. That was 9-speed, not the newer stuff.
I beg to differ. Brakes, for one, are a different issue and having brakes of the same make is not essential if compatible. Nice, but not essential. Crank is not essential, either.

In the end, 105 appears to be the best component set for the money for the large majority of us.

My opinion, take it or leave it, your option.
david58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-13, 04:35 PM   #22
dprayvd
Cabrõnista©®™‽
 
dprayvd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: a hi-fructose cornholé!
Bikes:
Posts: 481
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's an engaging compare&contrast podcast regarding today's group-sets. Part 1 & Part 2. Enjoy.
dprayvd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-13, 06:48 PM   #23
Ron Harry
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central florida
Bikes:
Posts: 192
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's my lean on things; the only thing I've ever ridden were either ultegra or 105 in road bikes. 105 has been very dependable for me, rock solid performance. I've just grown to be quite confident in 105. Ultegra is nice too; but the lastest 6700 rendition seems a lot more 'tin-ee' sounding and just does not give me that 'solid' feel to it as I shift. I think hollow technology or some such meant to save a few grams is the reason for that 'tin-ee' sound to it. I don't like it as much, even though, it does what it's meant to do, which is shift gears in a timely fashion. Past ultegra was better IMHO. My old 9 speed ultegra (6300 was it? too lazy to look it up just now) aluminum Trek was also rock solid in performance without the 'tin-ee' sound.

I've changed my thinking over the years, and used to think the 105 bikes were lesser quality [they do price in a lesser range]. Now, I LOOK for the 105 models and ask for it [I don't buy bikes every day of course].

I've always wanted to try dura ace just to compare, but could never afford it [has anyone noted the gigantic jump in price to dura ace? Titanium no doubt?]. I'd also like to try SRAM, but who gets to own so many bikes that they peruse all of what's available [maybe the pros, who knows?]. As far as raw performance and disregarding weight [my 105 bikes come in from 18 to 20 lbs; my ultegra bikes are usually 16-18 lbs], it's all 105 for me. I'm not a racer, so weight is not critical [especially when I could save bunches by just going on diet, LOL].

[though I see apparently they are trying to hawk the tiagra components again as somehow being upgraded from a few years ago. Last I purchased and checked things out more up close and personal was 2010...so maybe things have changed, I dunno. 105 for me though, tried and true].
Ron Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-13, 06:59 PM   #24
koolerb
Senior Member
 
koolerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Bikes: Giant Defy 1, and some others
Posts: 891
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY- View Post
Thanks everyone. I appreciate your feedback. I guess an actual bike test is in order. What I'm looking for is durability and reliability, not so much for the swag. I really don't care to impress anyone.
I just rode them both on test rides. The Ultegra feels smoother, I liked it better. But ended up buying a bike with 105 because the price difference was pretty substantial. Buy as much as your wallet can handle.
koolerb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-13, 09:12 PM   #25
cwar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Bikes: BH RC1, Bianchi Volpe, Orbea Avant
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -VELOCITY- View Post
My budget is $800.00 max.
I don't think that will get you Ultegra or 105 on a new bike.
cwar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.