Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-13, 05:44 AM   #26
ratdog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Bikes:
Posts: 874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
Nope. Not by a long shot. A very, very long shot.
+1, I can think of some loosly termed hobbies, some legal, some illegal where you can blow that kind of money in 30 minutes.
ratdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 06:02 AM   #27
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,515
Off the top of my head, I can think of 3 very legal hobbies/sports which could spend a whole lot more than that in no time at all.

A $900 bicycle is inexpensive in the cycling world. $900 is a drop in the bucket in the equestrian world.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 06:20 AM   #28
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,992
Imagine being a sportscar racer with a cocaine problem. You could really blow through some cash there!
rebel1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 12:19 PM   #29
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajenkins View Post
It's the inevitable result of the ongoing (and misplaced, in my mind) focus on racing. So long as the industry focuses on a single, narrow, aspect of cycling, its growth will be limited. It's time for cycling in America to grow up.
Agree 100%. The cited blog is right on target on this subject, including all 5 recommended steps.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 12:32 PM   #30
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ajenkins View Post
It's the inevitable result of the ongoing (and misplaced, in my mind) focus on racing. So long as the industry focuses on a single, narrow, aspect of cycling, its growth will be limited. It's time for cycling in America to grow up.
I remain confused by the people who think that making cycling less cool is the secret to making it more cool. Your average punter in birkenstocks, with a beard, riding a fredcycle has never been cool in his life. There is no way that his way is the way that lights the cycling fuse on America.
rebel1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 12:59 PM   #31
FlatSix911
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
FlatSix911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Altos, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,724
Interesting but OT ...

Quote:
Here are the top 10 most expensive hobbies according to Forbes:

10. Big game hunting

9. Sailing

8. Mountain climbing

7. Polo

6. Cigarette boat racing

5. Hot air ballooning

4. Art collecting

3. Drag racing

2. Flying

1. Dressage

Last edited by FlatSix911; 06-02-13 at 06:41 PM.
FlatSix911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 01:05 PM   #32
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatSix911 View Post
Interesting but OT ...
The vast majority of drag racers are bracket racing, which can be one of the cheapest forms of motor racing. So I have my doubts about that list.
rebel1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 04:03 PM   #33
the sci guy 
bill nyecycles
 
the sci guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Bikes:
Posts: 1,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
Nope. Not by a long shot. A very, very long shot.
Notice how I said 3 of. Not the top 3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post
Off the top of my head, I can think of 3 very legal hobbies/sports which could spend a whole lot more than that in no time at all.

A $900 bicycle is inexpensive in the cycling world. $900 is a drop in the bucket in the equestrian world.
So can I - horses came in at #1. But regardless, while a $900 bike may be on the "low end" of bikes, it's still drastically expensive. Blows my mind how anyone could think that $900 is cheap. And like you said, there are plenty of bikes that cost $3-4k. Not cheap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatSix911 View Post
Interesting but OT ...
I don't really consider drag racing, cigarette boat racing, or hot air ballooning hobbies. more like extraordinary career paths.
the equipment for mountain climbing isn't so bad - it's the permits that cost you.

anyway, my point is, and remains, i'm not surprised sales were down, and will continue to go down as long as the everyman can't afford the absurd prices of a "quality" bicycle.
the sci guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 05:45 PM   #34
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 7,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahon.Steve View Post
If you ask me, the prices of new bikes continues to go up and up. I don't see this changing any time soon but maybe the pu is holding onto their current ride because the bike manufacturers are pricing themselves out of business.

And this is true. It's about profit. Nike gets their shoes made in China for $5 to $7 in labor, material, shipping, and factory profit depending if the shoe is low or high end; then another $35 is added for R&D, warehousing, advertising, and Nike Corp profit; then the shoe is sold for $70 to $300. There isn't much difference in material cost of a cheap Nike vs an high end Nike! I think the same is true with CF frames, there's very little increase in the cost of CF frame material going into the cost of a $1,500 CF bike to a $15,000 CF bike; and the same can be said about the group sets chosen. So profits start to soar the more expensive the bike is; and in doing so it leaves the possibility of bike manufactures pricing themselves out of business, but I guess time will prove if this is correct. Americans like their hobbies, and like to spend money on their hobbies, and that alone could be enough to keep bike manufactures going.
rekmeyata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 07:15 PM   #35
ThermionicScott 
Gratuitous glib and snark
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)
Posts: 12,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
anyway, my point is, and remains, i'm not surprised sales were down, and will continue to go down as long as the everyman can't afford the absurd prices of a "quality" bicycle.
Bikes may cost more than you think they should, but sales aren't down because everybody bought their new bikes last year.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
RUSA #7498

Random parts for sale!
ThermionicScott is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 07:24 PM   #36
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
Notice how I said 3 of. Not the top 3.

So can I - horses came in at #1. But regardless, while a $900 bike may be on the "low end" of bikes, it's still drastically expensive. Blows my mind how anyone could think that $900 is cheap. And like you said, there are plenty of bikes that cost $3-4k. Not cheap.
Cycling, photography, and golf don't even make the top 10 ... probably not even the top 20.

The three I was thinking of, off the top of my head, were equestrian pursuits (#1 on the list above), motor sports (#3 on the list above, and other aspects of motor sports probably take up spots in the 11-20 range of most expensive sports/hobbies), and sailing (#9 on the list above).

And really ... $900 is not expensive, it is quite cheap, especially considering that if you take care of them, bicycles can last a long time. You can get a decent entry-level bicycle for that price ... I have one which I bought more than a decade ago.



If bicycles sales have indeed dropped (very hard to tell from a snapshot comparison of one March against another March in one country), my guess would be it's because people have simply opted to hang onto the bicycles they've got for the time being. Rowan and I haven't bought new bicycles in 16 months ... what we've got will work for now.

Last edited by Machka; 06-02-13 at 07:34 PM.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 08:01 PM   #37
Rowan
Has opinion, will express
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 14,558
One of the issues that emerge in a discussion like this is that we talk about new bike sales. There is a vast trade in used bicycles going on all the time which is not included in the figures, because the bike business cannot track those sales.

Participation rates are probably a more reliable indicator of the health of cycling.
Rowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 08:09 PM   #38
Burton
Certified Bike Brat
 
Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Bikes:
Posts: 4,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
my hobbies are: biking, photography, and golf. 3 of the most expensive hobbies around. triple sigh.
the bike i want? $900.
the camera i want? $1500
the new driver or 3 wood? $175-300
Expensive is relative.

Twenty five years ago I needed an optically corrected wide angle lens to shoot aircraft cockpit layouts. Twenty five years ago a Zeiss 15mm lens in 35mm format was $3,500.

Twenty five years later I'm currently looking into a HED wheelset for about the same price. Maybe you should be happy it takes so little to put a smile on your face.
Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 08:31 PM   #39
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,515
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowan View Post
One of the issues that emerge in a discussion like this is that we talk about new bike sales. There is a vast trade in used bicycles going on all the time which is not included in the figures, because the bike business cannot track those sales.

Participation rates are probably a more reliable indicator of the health of cycling.

And are the stats in the March to March comparison for whole, fully-built bicycles? Or do they include all the people who choose to buy frames and build the bicycles up?

A few of our bicycles were purchased fully-built, but quite a few were purchased in pieces from various parts of the world (UK, Australia, New Zealand), and built up. I doubt those would be reflected in the OP's link.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 09:18 PM   #40
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 7,365
Expense is relative like one poster mentioned. Back in 1976 I bought a brand new Trek TX900 with Campy Super Record components, the total price of the bike was about $900, after inflation today that bike would cost me $3,292. In 1984 I bought a brand new Trek 660 (frame and fork) and new Suntour Superbe component package that cost me about $1,100, after inflation that would cost me $2,478 today. But inflation did a nasty trick, today you can't get a bike with top end components for $2,478 or even $3,292, so something is wrong in the biking industry that far out accelerated inflation. Last week I took delivery of a 2013 Lynskey with just mid level components, though I did change the fork and headset to high end and the rear derailleur to the next level up but one down from high end, and it cost me $2,900 not including accessories. So basically I spent close to the same amount of money after inflation that I did in 1976 and in 1984 except I could have paid a lot more if I had upgraded to Shimano Dura Ace from 105, but Dura Ace level is the same highest level I got from Campy in 76 and Suntour in 84.

Due to that inflation and explosion in cost of bikes a $900 is not a very good bike for someone who rides everyday and rides quite few miles each time. A $900 bike today would have been about $220 bike in 1976, and you couldn't get much back then either. A $900 bike won't hold up for long, sure you could get maybe 2 years maybe 3 out if it if you're real good at maintaining it if you average 5,000 miles a year. But I learned a long time ago the last thing I want riding 50 miles from home is some inexpensive component breaking, and to get better components that have greater reliability.

Point is even with inflation adjusted you still can't get as good of a bike for your money today as you could have bought 35 years ago or so. And the even stranger thing is...most of today's bikes are made in China, 35 years ago it was America and you pay more for a bike today made in China then you would have 35 years ago made in America.
rekmeyata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 10:04 PM   #41
TrojanHorse 
SuperGimp
 
TrojanHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Whittier, CA
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix
Posts: 10,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by the sci guy View Post
my hobbies are: biking, photography, and golf. 3 of the most expensive hobbies around. triple sigh.
the bike i want? $900.
the camera i want? $1500
the new driver or 3 wood? $175-300
Cheap, cheap, cheap. And you're picking examples at the low end of each, and in each case, the purchased item will last for years with no further "investment".

Golf is only expensive because greens fees are pricey. The equipment is relatively modest unless you insist on "upgrading" twice a year.
__________________
"No self-respecting man rides 70 miles and has salad at a pizza joint!" - PhotoJoe
"I like SoCal a lot better than New Jersey" - RubeRad
TrojanHorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 10:38 PM   #42
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,405
Quote:
Originally Posted by rekmeyata View Post
Due to that inflation and explosion in cost of bikes a $900 is not a very good bike for someone who rides everyday and rides quite few miles each time. A $900 bike today would have been about $220 bike in 1976, and you couldn't get much back then either. A $900 bike won't hold up for long, sure you could get maybe 2 years maybe 3 out if it if you're real good at maintaining it if you average 5,000 miles a year.
Don't know about that.
In 1972 I bought a new Raleigh Sports with 3 speed coaster and Brooks B72 saddle for $82.
In 1976 I bought a new Raleigh Superbe with 3 speed coaster, Dyno front hub and Brooks B66 saddle for $135.

Those bikes were probably better all weather, low/no maintenance city bikes than anything sold today in the U.S. at any price.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 10:41 PM   #43
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 7,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Don't know about that.
In 1972 I bought a new Raleigh Sports with 3 speed coaster and Brooks B72 saddle for $82.
In 1976 I bought a new Raleigh Superbe with 3 speed coaster, Dyno front hub and Brooks B66 saddle for $135.

Those bikes were probably better all weather, low/no maintenance city bikes than anything sold today in the U.S. at any price.
Not sure why you're comparing 3 speed coasters to 10 speed bikes, I'm surprised you didn't quote single speed bike for $54 which was even less maintenance then the 3 speed bikes.
rekmeyata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-13, 10:47 PM   #44
rekmeyata
Senior Member
 
rekmeyata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Bikes:
Posts: 7,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrojanHorse View Post
Cheap, cheap, cheap. And you're picking examples at the low end of each, and in each case, the purchased item will last for years with no further "investment".

Golf is only expensive because greens fees are pricey. The equipment is relatively modest unless you insist on "upgrading" twice a year.

Golf? Lets see, typically there are 3 woods, at least 8 irons, and a putter for a total of 12, 12 times $175 for his cheapest mentioned price range means a set of clubs will cost him $2,100 and he's willing to pay that much money for a bunch of sticks to hit a ball with but doesn't want to spend more then $900 for a bicycle? Obviously this guy is more interested in golf then cycling.
rekmeyata is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.