New Member, Tire Question
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: West Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 3
Bikes: Old School Kona Mutt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
New Member, Tire Question
OK, so, I dusted off the old mt bike. My gut is getting too big, time to get in better shape. I am a little embarrassed at how badly out of shape I have gotten. No problem, I have a fluid trainer to get me more or less road worthy. I will be riding a mt bike mainly on the roads for a while, with the knobby tires, it is noisy as heck on the trainer. What slicks would be good to get? Been out of biking for years, so have no clue what companies are good these days.
I used to keep up with the latest and greatest, but not now. To put it in perceptive, I have Onza clipless pedals, and that newfangled V-Brake tech on my bike. And my bike is way older than the V-Brakes.
Never had slicks on my bike, anything to look into as far as width, brands... Local bike shop has rarely steered me wrong, just don't know what width of tire to get, what brands are good...
I hate to go shopping without some knowledge of what is optimal.
Thanks.
I used to keep up with the latest and greatest, but not now. To put it in perceptive, I have Onza clipless pedals, and that newfangled V-Brake tech on my bike. And my bike is way older than the V-Brakes.
Never had slicks on my bike, anything to look into as far as width, brands... Local bike shop has rarely steered me wrong, just don't know what width of tire to get, what brands are good...
I hate to go shopping without some knowledge of what is optimal.
Thanks.
#2
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,811
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 788 Post(s)
Liked 688 Times
in
367 Posts
Nashbar Streetwise Slicks: https://www.nashbar.com/bikes/Product...57_-1___202472 . Anything in 26 x 1.50" with a slick tread will be pretty similar.
You can probably pump them to 80 psi without issue.
I rode my mountain bike with 26 x 1.25" slicks pumped to 100 psi for a while. (I'm 6-foot-4, 230 pounds.) It was a very fast, reliable commuter.
You can probably pump them to 80 psi without issue.
I rode my mountain bike with 26 x 1.25" slicks pumped to 100 psi for a while. (I'm 6-foot-4, 230 pounds.) It was a very fast, reliable commuter.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
363 Posts
Unless you ride on some pretty seriously rocky trails, slicks will work better for you and won't sound like a motor cycle on the trainer.
I'm sure others will argue, but I'm not a big fan of real skinny tires on mountain bikes. I think that anything less than about 1.5" wide looks goofy. I've got 1.9" tires on my beater bike and never thought I paid a performance penalty over skinnier tires.
I'm sure others will argue, but I'm not a big fan of real skinny tires on mountain bikes. I think that anything less than about 1.5" wide looks goofy. I've got 1.9" tires on my beater bike and never thought I paid a performance penalty over skinnier tires.
#4
DancesWithSUVs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
What are you looking to spend? Schwalbe Marathon Supremes are pretty much the best slicks out there,but usually go for $50+. Kenda Kwests aren't as nice,but are decent tires and cost less than half as much. Vittoria Randonneurs fall in the middle for quality and price.
__________________
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589
Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I ride with Schwalbe Marathon Supremes, 2 inch wide, and like them a lot. Durable, smooth, good grip.
The wider the tire, the lower you want the pressure. Here is a table I came up with for pressure - weight on a single wheel across the top, tire width in mm down the side, pressure at the corresponding row/column intersection:
The wider the tire, the lower you want the pressure. Here is a table I came up with for pressure - weight on a single wheel across the top, tire width in mm down the side, pressure at the corresponding row/column intersection:
#6
Senior Member
I don't doubt you, Jim, but why wide = lower pressure?
M.
M.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 3,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As for brand, I rode an old Bridgestone mountain bike on the road for years, even did a century on it, and I couldn't tell a significant difference among brands of slick(ish) tires. About 1.5, 70-80 psi and just go ride.
#10
Senior Member
Geax Street Runners are good and decent slicks. I ordered them online for my mtn bike and I'm happy with them
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589
Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's part of the reason. The other reason is that you can get away with it. One valuable function of tires is that they provide suspension. Getting pounded by rough pavement actually takes energy & slows a ride down. Skinny tires have to be pumped up hard to provide enough force to support the rim and avoid pinch flats, dented rims, etc. Fat tires, because of the same pounds per square inch, can support the same weight with lower pressure. They can avoid pinch flats at the same time they provide suspension.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 5
Bikes: '94 Trek 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just put a pair of 2" Schwalbe Kojaks on my old Trek 930 and am really pleased with them. The ride is so much smoother and quieter now, and the new tires grip the pavement noticeably better than the old knobbies. Plus they're a bit zippier and it's easier to pedal up hills. I've been riding them at 70 psi and the only downside so far is a slight bit of extra harshness over the biggest bumps, but I hardly notice and the benefits are so worth it.
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I just put a pair of 2" Schwalbe Kojaks on my old Trek 930 and am really pleased with them. The ride is so much smoother and quieter now, and the new tires grip the pavement noticeably better than the old knobbies. Plus they're a bit zippier and it's easier to pedal up hills. I've been riding them at 70 psi and the only downside so far is a slight bit of extra harshness over the biggest bumps, but I hardly notice and the benefits are so worth it.
Its about right for 28mm tyres and average weight.
With those tyres I'd use ~ 40 psi rear and ~ 32 psi front,
very different, but loads more grip and no harshness.
Might not feel as fast, but will go faster.
(And the tyres will last quite a bit longer.)
Higher if you are heavy, (I'm average), e.g. 50/40.
Last edited by sreten; 07-24-13 at 08:03 PM.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 5
Bikes: '94 Trek 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not an elephant, I just liked the ride on my old knobbies more when they were inflated to just under their max so I've been starting high with these. I do plan on trying them out with less pressure as well, so I will give your suggestion a shot, thanks.
#15
Banned.
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1,662
Bikes: 20" Folder, Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
FWIW what I did with my 47mm / 1.75" tyres on my folder :
Pumped them both up to 50 psi. The front was harsh, bouncing off
off road bumps and felt skittish with little grip. So it let it down
to the point it coped well with the typical local crap roads I ride.
I then purposely road over road bumps, ridges, drain covers
etc comparing the back to the front and pumped up the rear
so it felt about as harsh through the saddle as the front.
I've probably settled on generally running it somewhat a bit lower,
but always have the above matching pretty near between the tyres,
the rear being always being pumped up harder than the front.
rgds, sreten.
Last edited by sreten; 07-24-13 at 07:32 PM.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 5
Bikes: '94 Trek 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi,
FWIW what I did with my 47mm / 1.75" tyres on my folder :
Pumped them both up to 50 psi. The front was harsh, bouncing off
off road bumps and felt skittish with little grip. So it let it down
to the point it coped well with the typical local roads I ride.
I then purposely road over road bumps, ridges, drain covers
etc comparing the back to the front and pumped up the rear
so it felt about as harsh through the saddle as the front.
I've probably settled on generally running it somewhat a bit lower,
but always have the above matching pretty near between the tyres,
the rear being always being pumped up harder than the front.
rgds, sreten.
FWIW what I did with my 47mm / 1.75" tyres on my folder :
Pumped them both up to 50 psi. The front was harsh, bouncing off
off road bumps and felt skittish with little grip. So it let it down
to the point it coped well with the typical local roads I ride.
I then purposely road over road bumps, ridges, drain covers
etc comparing the back to the front and pumped up the rear
so it felt about as harsh through the saddle as the front.
I've probably settled on generally running it somewhat a bit lower,
but always have the above matching pretty near between the tyres,
the rear being always being pumped up harder than the front.
rgds, sreten.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 100
Bikes: 2004 LeMond Reno, 200? LeMond Buenos Aires, 199? Peugeot, 199? Yokota Yosemite, 199? GT Tequesta, 198? Bianchi Sport, 1984 Nishiki Prestige, 197? Gitane TDF
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm curious about the Bontrager Hank https://bontrager.com/model/02856 I discovered them earlier this week by accident. At 60 tpi they should give a smoother ride.
I used to be a max inflation rider, but even though it doesn't feel like it, lower pressures are faster due to bad terrain not displacing the tires energy/inertia...and, it's considerably more comfortable. The Schwalbe Kojaks look great but I wanted wider. Anyone ever measure the Kojaks actual width?
#19
DancesWithSUVs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
We've been through this before.
I run 70psi in the 26x2" Marathon Supremes on my Safari. If you disagree with this,then you are wrong. You can pull out your chart and give me examples from personal experience,and you'll still be wrong. That's because it's my bike,not yours. 70psi is within the manufacturer's specs,as well as the rim's,and I like it. So that is the correct tire pressure.
I run 70psi in the 26x2" Marathon Supremes on my Safari. If you disagree with this,then you are wrong. You can pull out your chart and give me examples from personal experience,and you'll still be wrong. That's because it's my bike,not yours. 70psi is within the manufacturer's specs,as well as the rim's,and I like it. So that is the correct tire pressure.
__________________
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
#20
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: West Monroe, Louisiana
Posts: 3
Bikes: Old School Kona Mutt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It sure is much more quiet on the trainer.
#21
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,500
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3872 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
I ride with Schwalbe Marathon Supremes, 2 inch wide, and like them a lot. Durable, smooth, good grip.
The wider the tire, the lower you want the pressure. Here is a table I came up with for pressure - weight on a single wheel across the top, tire width in mm down the side, pressure at the corresponding row/column intersection:
The wider the tire, the lower you want the pressure. Here is a table I came up with for pressure - weight on a single wheel across the top, tire width in mm down the side, pressure at the corresponding row/column intersection:
My wife rides an MTB frame and wheelset on the road with Ritchie Tom Slick 26 X 1" tires at 100 lbs. They work great on the road and trainer both. Obviously she doesn't run up on curbs with these, though bunny hopping is fine. You want big fat tires for curbs to absorb the shock, though they are contraindicated for normal road riding.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589
Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Ah, my chart also neglects wheel diameter! I think pressure is inversely proportional to the square root of the wheel diameter. The chart is a fit to Berto's graphs for 700C tires. For 26 inch tires, about 10% more should be good.
It is certainly true that charts like this are way too simple. But I would say that the pressure range on the sidewall is also rather simple. Certainly going much over the top is risky. But just what makes a manufacture put a particular pressure range on a sidewall can be rather strange, it seems. There are engineers, marketeers, lawyers, etc. and who wins the debate will vary.
The business of pressure vs rim width is quite fascinating. Just the subject of rim width vs tire width. It seems like wide tires on narrow rims is quite common these days. It's not clear it is anything like optimal. Look at the range of rim widths "approved" for 50 mm tires:
https://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...dimensions#rim
Is the best pressure for a 50 mm tire the same on a 17 mm rim as on a 27 mm rim? Yeah my chart totally omits this little detail but I suspect it really isn't so small. It does seem that at least on the narrowest rims you won't want to be putting too high a pressure in the tire because that puts a very large stress on the rims. On the wider rims the angle of the sidewall leaving the rim is not so abrupt so a higher pressure should be less risky.
Definitely on rough roads a bit lower pressure is good, to provide suspension, but not so low as to risk pinch flats. On smooth roads the suspension isn't so valuable and so higher pressure is nice to reduce the rolling resistance. There are a zillion factors. Yeah if you have lots of luggage then suspension is nice but if it's just you on the bike then maybe high pressure is good if you can just hop the bike over any rough spots. Much harder to hop a bike with 60 pounds of groceries in the panniers, especially with platform pedals!
The real purpose of the chart is just to try to open up thinking on the subject. Once you start thinking about optimum pressure as a function of width and load.... it can be a fun space to explore!
It is certainly true that charts like this are way too simple. But I would say that the pressure range on the sidewall is also rather simple. Certainly going much over the top is risky. But just what makes a manufacture put a particular pressure range on a sidewall can be rather strange, it seems. There are engineers, marketeers, lawyers, etc. and who wins the debate will vary.
The business of pressure vs rim width is quite fascinating. Just the subject of rim width vs tire width. It seems like wide tires on narrow rims is quite common these days. It's not clear it is anything like optimal. Look at the range of rim widths "approved" for 50 mm tires:
https://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...dimensions#rim
Is the best pressure for a 50 mm tire the same on a 17 mm rim as on a 27 mm rim? Yeah my chart totally omits this little detail but I suspect it really isn't so small. It does seem that at least on the narrowest rims you won't want to be putting too high a pressure in the tire because that puts a very large stress on the rims. On the wider rims the angle of the sidewall leaving the rim is not so abrupt so a higher pressure should be less risky.
Definitely on rough roads a bit lower pressure is good, to provide suspension, but not so low as to risk pinch flats. On smooth roads the suspension isn't so valuable and so higher pressure is nice to reduce the rolling resistance. There are a zillion factors. Yeah if you have lots of luggage then suspension is nice but if it's just you on the bike then maybe high pressure is good if you can just hop the bike over any rough spots. Much harder to hop a bike with 60 pounds of groceries in the panniers, especially with platform pedals!
The real purpose of the chart is just to try to open up thinking on the subject. Once you start thinking about optimum pressure as a function of width and load.... it can be a fun space to explore!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 100
Bikes: 2004 LeMond Reno, 200? LeMond Buenos Aires, 199? Peugeot, 199? Yokota Yosemite, 199? GT Tequesta, 198? Bianchi Sport, 1984 Nishiki Prestige, 197? Gitane TDF
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for checking, good sign that all sizes might be as accurate. The Kojaks are great looking tires, they remind of goodyear slicks on rail dragsters. I hadn't thought about them in 20" before, but know I'm tempted to put a set on my childhood bike that I'm slowly rebuilding. Oh, man!!!
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 100
Bikes: 2004 LeMond Reno, 200? LeMond Buenos Aires, 199? Peugeot, 199? Yokota Yosemite, 199? GT Tequesta, 198? Bianchi Sport, 1984 Nishiki Prestige, 197? Gitane TDF
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am by no means a weight weenie, but those tires are 750+ grams/tire, in a 26" size. I will not run over three pounds of tire on anything that I have to pedal uphill.
The best selection of 26" street tires that I have found is here.
The best selection of 26" street tires that I have found is here.
Looking at the tires you linked, I'd only be interested in the Maxxis Hookworm 2.5"; unfortunately they're too wide for my brakes. And, wow, 1250 grams each!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RomansFiveEight
Hybrid Bicycles
3
01-22-15 02:07 PM