Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Bike kit is too expensive

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Bike kit is too expensive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-14, 11:50 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bike kit is too expensive

I'm looking into getting some new kit and was thinking this too:

Why are bikes so expensive? - Telegraph

What do you reckon?
Safapark is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 11:53 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Tory-Royalist.. you want others to work for free, too?

they are focusing on the Ferrari end of the market, the Monaco Tax dodging set .

the Pro teams pay people to ride that stuff , the racer's dont Buy their own bikes .

Last edited by fietsbob; 08-28-14 at 11:57 AM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:17 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
In 1985, a bike with Reynolds 531 tubing would surely have cost more than 200 GBP.

The first bike I bought for myself was a Raleigh Super Course, in around 1970. As I recall, the main seat tubes were 531 but the forks and stays were lesser steel. It was the cheapest Raleigh with any 531. As I recall, that bike was above $200. Lots of lawns mowed!

Yeah a 3000 GBP bike is still quite on the high end. Another sort of spectrum... why do you want a bike? 1) to ride around; 2) to get physically fit; 3) to keep up with other riders; 4) to race; 5) to win.

These days I think $1500 gets you a very nice bike. Maybe $500 is about as cheap as I would recommend to anyone for a new bike. Still quite expensive for lots of folks... though what is that, three pair of fancy sneakers?
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:20 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well, here is a nice picture:

Retro Raleighs: The Super Course

that is my old bike for sure! It says $125. OK, that was 40+ years ago, so much for my memory!
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
linnefaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: florida
Posts: 1,845

Bikes: 1990 Trek 820, 1995 Trek 1220

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Oh good grief! That's like comparing all cars to Ferrari's?
linnefaulk is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:24 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299

Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
You mention kit, which most people take to mean clothing and accessories, but then link to an article about the cost of bikes. They're related, but not entirely the same.

What the article fails to point out is the vast majority of people who get into the sport, and even stay in it, choose to ride on equipment and use clothing that doesn't represent the most expensive in the category. And these are people who bike more than the average person, wear their clothes out sooner, etc. So if they can do it, there's no reason the more casual cyclist can't.

Bike equipment and clothing is like anything else. Every company has some lines that are dedicated to the top of the market because margins are higher there and those lines help finance their overall R&D costs. But, as has been said here many times, we ll benefit from that at some point because of the economics of "trickle down," coupled with the fact that someone's always looking to buy the latest and greatest, which continually funds the R&D cycle.
cafzali is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:31 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Only suckers and newbs pay retail.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 12:42 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 10,879
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
This article is silly. Just because the most expensive bicycles (or cars or whatever) are getting more expensive doesn't mean you have to buy them. There are plenty of cheaper bicycles on the market and that is what most people buy.
johnny99 is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:00 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just like I can't afford a Bugatti Veyron, I can't afford and don't need a 12,000 GBP bike. On the other hand, I find servicing and buying parts for my bikes to be a pleasant change from the $400 brake jobs and $600 major maintenance packages that are the norm for cars. I can lift the bike without jacks and the parts are much cheaper.
Igualmente is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:30 PM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry, I should have just said bikes (kit's not cheap either though but I haven't seen an article about that).
Just wondered what everyone's thoughts were. What do you think would be the minimum you can get a half decent racing bike set up for these days then? Is it a case of you get what you pay for? Or is it, past a certain point, like an expensive watch? Doesn't tell the time any better.
Safapark is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:39 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
JameB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Only suckers and newbs pay retail.
Teach us your ways master!
JameB is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:51 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
$2000/1200gbp should get you plenty of bike to start racing.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:52 PM
  #13  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by Safapark
Sorry, I should have just said bikes (kit's not cheap either though but I haven't seen an article about that).
Just wondered what everyone's thoughts were. What do you think would be the minimum you can get a half decent racing bike set up for these days then? Is it a case of you get what you pay for? Or is it, past a certain point, like an expensive watch? Doesn't tell the time any better.
You can race on anything that meets the rules. People would be able to answer these questions better if you could offer your location and what all you plan to do with said bike.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:56 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 591

Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I paid $200 for a vintage road bike, and I'm still not faster than it. And I suspect that is true for many many riders.
JamesRL is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 01:58 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Minneapols, Minnesota
Posts: 538

Bikes: 89 Raleigh Technium PRE, 92 SP 1000 ti, '09 Team Pro, 72 International, 63 Hercules 3-spd, '81 Vitus 979, 2 Kabuki Submariners, 2 C. Itoh Submariners, Gary Fisher Big Sur, Skyway 3-spd, Robin Hood w/ S-A IGH 5 speed.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Only suckers and newbs pay retail.
I hate retail!
modelmartin is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 02:33 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by JameB
Teach us your ways master!
There are lots of things you can do. Best thing is to join a club. People are always selling off their stuff or know others that are.
caloso is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 02:36 PM
  #17  
WALSTIB
 
hillyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,798
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 280 Post(s)
Liked 384 Times in 183 Posts
Just the term kit makes me wonder if someone is too doped up to put the thread in road racing
__________________
www.bikeleague.org

hillyman is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 02:37 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
lots of wannabe racers work in bike shops, to get stuff at cost [+10%] wages kinda stink
because everybody else wants cheap too . and you are where the costs are cut.


'Kit' its like kilt same countries .. limeys
fietsbob is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 02:49 PM
  #19  
Señor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,066
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 649 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 215 Posts
bikes aren't expensive
necessarily
but there are expensive bikes

and there are also online reltailers
and online bike brands
and used bikes

the last word on the article is give to a mr david standard
"In my opinion a decent racing bike nowadays is £3000, anything over that is not going to make any difference,"
Wilfred Laurier is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 02:57 PM
  #20  
Thunder Whisperer
 
no1mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OK
Posts: 8,843

Bikes: '06 Kona Smoke

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cafzali
You mention kit, which most people take to mean clothing and accessories, but then link to an article about the cost of bikes. They're related, but not entirely the same.
Depends on where one learns to speak and use English. The US and the UK (as well as other nations) share a common language, yet we still have trouble understanding each other at times on even a basic level...
__________________
Community guidelines
no1mad is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 05:44 PM
  #21  
In Real Life
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152

Bikes: Lots

Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times in 329 Posts
Originally Posted by Safapark
Sorry, I should have just said bikes (kit's not cheap either though but I haven't seen an article about that).
Just wondered what everyone's thoughts were. What do you think would be the minimum you can get a half decent racing bike set up for these days then? Is it a case of you get what you pay for? Or is it, past a certain point, like an expensive watch? Doesn't tell the time any better.

Bicycles ... and all the additional equipment, kit, etc. etc. that could go along with them ... are not all that expensive.


Not when you compare them to hobbies like yachting, motor sports, and equestrian.

Photography, one of my other hobbies, is roughly as expensive as cycling.
Machka is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 06:40 PM
  #22  
Cathedral City, CA
 
flatlander_48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cathedral City, CA
Posts: 1,504

Bikes: 2016 RITCHEY BreakAway (full Chorus 11), 2005 Ritchey BreakAway (full Chorus 11, STOLEN), 2001 Gary Fisher Tassajara mountain bike (sold), 2004 Giant TRC 2 road bike (sold)

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by modelmartin
I hate retail!
Well, sometimes that's the only tail you're going to get...
flatlander_48 is offline  
Old 08-28-14, 09:09 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 990

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 43 Posts
The article states that bike prices are increasing faster than the rate of inflation. *But, your top shelf 2014 bike has a LOT more technology than a top shelf 1984 bike. *Steel replaced with aluminum, aluminum replaced with carbon. *If you want to compare inflation, compare the same thing. *Build a Reynolds 531 or 7075 aluminum frame with 6sp indexed down tube shifters, no carbon anything and compare to the inflation adjusted price of the old bike. *

Of course, whether it's a 1984 or 2014 model, it's still much more about the motor than the bike. *A few pounds off the bike is nice, ergo shifters are really nice, but all the modern carbon parts in the world won't help you if the other guy is just putting out more power. *The pros are in a gear race because the top guys are really all so close to each other in performance that they do need the equipment. *The rest of us, not so much. *
Caliper is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 06:20 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by johnny99
This article is silly. Just because the most expensive bicycles (or cars or whatever) are getting more expensive doesn't mean you have to buy them. There are plenty of cheaper bicycles on the market and that is what most people buy.
Even the most expensive bicycles are not only cheap but they're accessible. An ordinary guy, if he chooses to, can buy the bicycling equivalent to last year's F1 car.

High end bicycles may also be the ultimate status symbol. Park a $30,000 boat and trailer in your driveway and your neighbors might not even notice. Casually let it drop that you paid half of that amount for a bicycle that you still have to pedal and they'll think you must have money to burn.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 08-29-14, 07:26 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
As with most anything more money gets better bikes and kit. That is up to a point. Usually mid range gets you to a point that beyond that, all you are buying is hype glits, snobbery, and name.
rydabent is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.