Shifters on the downtube...why?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: mars
Posts: 759
Bikes: 2015 synapse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Shifters on the downtube...why?
When I was browsing craigslist for my first road bike, I noticed a lot of older bikes with shifters on the downtube.
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Seattlish
Posts: 2,751
Bikes: SWorks Stumpy, Haibike Xduro RX, Crave SS
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 514 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
8 Posts
People used to be more flexible!
or, they just had not figured out a more convenient location, because all that is modern is evil.
or, they just had not figured out a more convenient location, because all that is modern is evil.
#3
Senior Member
It's a clean, simple elegant place for the shifters. I still have a bike with downtube shifters. If you have the chance, you should try riding a bike with them sometime. I think you'd be surprised.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
It was the style of racing bikes back in the day. Road bikes from the era were built for riding in the drops, so it might have been more efficient to reach down to the downtube than to reach up to the handlebars or top bar to shift. Fwiw, vintage touring bikes sometimes came with bar end shifters, which are still available on touring bikes. And recreational 10 speeds had stem shifters which worked better for riders who mostly rode on the tops or hoods.
Last edited by MRT2; 01-18-15 at 11:37 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I tried it for a few years, but much prefer brifters. I love vintage, but downtube shifters are not for me.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,553
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4196 Post(s)
Liked 2,912 Times
in
1,781 Posts
It was much simpler and made a much more direct connection with the derailleurs without all the extra curves of cable and housing (heck, FD didn't even need housing).
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#7
Senior Member
If you take brake/shift levers out of the equation, which are an obvious step forward, I think downtube shifters are as good as anything.
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
If you take brake/shift levers out of the equation, which are an obvious step forward, I think downtube shifters are as good as anything.
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 642 Times
in
363 Posts
If you take brake/shift levers out of the equation, which are an obvious step forward, I think downtube shifters are as good as anything.
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
First, the front derailleur cable has no housing, just a bend at the bottom bracket. The rear derailleur has one section of housing from the chainstay to the derailleur. The reach to the levers is less than the reach to a water bottle. So if you're able to access your water bottle, you can easily reach your shifter.
If taking one hand off the bars is a deal braker, explain a shifting system of that era that didn't at least occasionally require this? Bar end shifters are often ridden by riders who don't spend all their time in the drops. Stem mounted shifters will always require lifting a hand. What other options did you have in mind?
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 539
Bikes: Franken-mountain bike, mid-90s Performance TR1000, 1990 Cannondale ST400
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I 've been told that the more skilled riders of yore were able to shift through the gears by clipping the right shifter with their knee during sprints/standing efforts
#12
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,935
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times
in
1,916 Posts
Yes. The advantage to this was particularly evident in the days before die-drawn cables and teflon-lined housing.
#13
blah blah blah
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OP, this was your only choice before downtube shifters. And before that I believe they had a cog on either side of the rear wheel, so to "shift", you had to get off your bike and flip the rear wheel around.
Other than integrated brake lever/shifters, what are the "numerous" other styles of shifters that let you shift without moving your hands from the handlebars? Stem shifters and bar end shifters still require you to move your hands from the default riding position.
Other than integrated brake lever/shifters, what are the "numerous" other styles of shifters that let you shift without moving your hands from the handlebars? Stem shifters and bar end shifters still require you to move your hands from the default riding position.
Last edited by milkbaby; 01-18-15 at 01:06 PM.
#14
Steel is real
yes i have a raleigh flyer with the shifters on the down tube, i think it's a lot tidier than anything else... and when riding its not as if you have to lean forward to select a gear you just drop your arm to get to it.
maybe it saved a bit om weight too, compared to having the shifters on the stem or bar... hey it ain't much.. i know, just a thought
maybe it saved a bit om weight too, compared to having the shifters on the stem or bar... hey it ain't much.. i know, just a thought
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
When I was browsing craigslist for my first road bike, I noticed a lot of older bikes with shifters on the downtube.
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
I rode bikes with downtube shifters for years before brifters were developed. I must have been incredibly awesome to ride with such incredibly difficult shifting. Actually, though using brifters now, I'm still incredibly awesome. IMHO
#17
~>~
A simple easy downward movement that does not cross the center line of balance and keeps the center of gravity low when riding in a fast paceline on indifferent surfaces is clearly a bad idea.
Short responsive cable lengths w/ a minimum of housing are a worse idea.
40 years ago what precisely were the superior designs "compared to any other style shifter I've seen"?
The Schwinn stem shifters perhaps?
-Bandera
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gateway to the West
Posts: 810
Bikes: You mean this week?
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
15 Posts
I still use downtube shifters on my touring bike because they are simple, reliable, and work in indexed or friction mode. Derailleur a little out of whack? Need to make an emergency change to a different wheel or freewheel spacing? No problem! You can't do that with STI. That said, I'm a small guy, I can see where downtube shifters might be even more inconvenient for a tall guy, bar-ends with a friction option are the next best choice.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
Of the vintage bikes, there were 3 common locations.
Downtube
Stem
Bar Ends
Brifters involve much more engineering to get everything together and working right.
For the most part, the downtube shifters get them out of the way. They also have a direct cable path to both derailleurs, usually mostly, or completely without housings.
I put stem shifters on one bike, and am more likely to bump them than bumping the shifters when climbing than the downtube shifters. I would also think the stem shifters would be one more thing to crash into in a wreck. Bar end shifters are also a bit out of the way, and have a chance of getting bumped.
Anyway, when seated, the downtube shifters are easy to access, just reach down and they're right there. When standing, they are a bit more awkward. I have heard that people tend to shift more with the brifters than with the downtube shifters.
With downtube (or stem) shifters, it is easy to jump several gears to the desired gear, and one gets excellent feedback of which gear one is actually in without having to look back at the cluster or down to the chainrings (which may not be visible in the dark).
Downtube
Stem
Bar Ends
Brifters involve much more engineering to get everything together and working right.
For the most part, the downtube shifters get them out of the way. They also have a direct cable path to both derailleurs, usually mostly, or completely without housings.
I put stem shifters on one bike, and am more likely to bump them than bumping the shifters when climbing than the downtube shifters. I would also think the stem shifters would be one more thing to crash into in a wreck. Bar end shifters are also a bit out of the way, and have a chance of getting bumped.
Anyway, when seated, the downtube shifters are easy to access, just reach down and they're right there. When standing, they are a bit more awkward. I have heard that people tend to shift more with the brifters than with the downtube shifters.
With downtube (or stem) shifters, it is easy to jump several gears to the desired gear, and one gets excellent feedback of which gear one is actually in without having to look back at the cluster or down to the chainrings (which may not be visible in the dark).
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times
in
2,510 Posts
When I was browsing craigslist for my first road bike, I noticed a lot of older bikes with shifters on the downtube.
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
Why?
I just can't understand why they'd ever put them there. They seem incredibly difficult to access compared to any other style shifter I've seen. Why would they put them in a spot where you have to take a hand off your handlebars to shift, when there are numerous styles without that drawback? What possible advantage does this style have over literally every other common style from the past 4 decades?
You are looking at this backwards. DT shifters and parallelagram derailleurs were a huge step forward from the systems like the one shown above. They worked extremely well and were very reliable. They handled the increase of the number of cogs over the decades easily. They were not dependent on technology that hadn't been dreamed up yet (like low friction incompressible cable housings). Remember, Teflon wasn't even a concept yet.
And now? They still work, with any derailleur, chain and cogset out there with virtually no changes. Show me any other system that will work with whatever is out there in 20 years. Or that you can mix and match with anything. That survives routine crashes without hundreds of dollars of repairs. That is as light as anything out there. That is as reliable as anything out there. That anyone can break down and rebuild (but that may well go years or decades before it is ever needed).
All that is required to use them is a little learned skill. And once learned, it is like that old saying "like riding a bicycle", it never goes away. (Oh, but you have to remember that you have to plan ahead a little. A concept from a lost era.)
Another plus where racing was a way to escape generations of poverty for young men - your competitor couldn't reach over going in to a sprint and dump you into the wrong gear. (You never saw bar-end shifters on sprinter's bikes. And if the competitor tried you could knock his hand away with a sharp chop with yours. A tip I learned 35 years ago from folks who had raced at the amateur level in Europe.)
Ben
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
And now? They still work, with any derailleur, chain and cogset out there with virtually no changes. Show me any other system that will work with whatever is out there in 20 years. Or that you can mix and match with anything. That survives routine crashes without hundreds of dollars of repairs. That is as light as anything out there. That is as reliable as anything out there. That anyone can break down and rebuild (but that may well go years or decades before it is ever needed).
I did have a problem that the original levers were drilled, and weakened too much.
Then with the replacements, I managed to get 2 lefts levers, and no right lever. It has worked fine like that for years.
I have run them with 5spd, 6spd, 7spd, and 9spd without problem, although it may be dependent on getting the right shifter/derailleur match. To go back from 9 to 7 would just be a quick derailleur adjustment. I could probably squeeze in a 10 spd, but may not quite have enough cable pull for 11 spd. But really not bad for the flexibility, and exceeding the original design that may well be a half century old.
On another website there was a question about how long cable housings should last. I was of the opinion that a decade or two, perhaps longer if they are kept clean, dry, and without cuts, nicks, or kinks. Apparently the NEW housings hardly last a year. Scary thought with a half century of progress.
Another plus where racing was a way to escape generations of poverty for young men - your competitor couldn't reach over going in to a sprint and dump you into the wrong gear. (You never saw bar-end shifters on sprinter's bikes. And if the competitor tried you could knock his hand away with a sharp chop with yours. A tip I learned 35 years ago from folks who had raced at the amateur level in Europe.)
#23
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
I started riding with downtube shifters in the late 70s. I got a bicycle with brifters in 1999. I'm still not entirely convinced that they are better. I've actually considered going to a setup where I change my chainring with a downtube shifter and my cassette with a brifter ... apparently one or some of the TDF racers in relatively recent times use that setup.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#24
~>~
In the >40 years I've been in and around road racing in the USA I've seen and felt a lot of contact, almost all unintentional, but Never anything remotely like that.
Someone must have been watching "Breaking Away" again........
-Bandera
Someone must have been watching "Breaking Away" again........
-Bandera
#25
~>~