Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 18 of 233 FirstFirst ... 816171819202868118 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 5803
  1. #426
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,250
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by flaxx View Post
    ok, here are the *final* versions of my two hybrids, the result of more than a year of component bargain hunting at LBS'sesses and online stores

    If my current career plans don't work out, I'll open a bike shop This hobby is very addictive, once you have only *one* spare component, your mind starts working out what kind of bike it could be used for ...

    cheers, flaxx
    The BMC is ultra high tech. Are you using SRAM derailleurs? Nice job
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  2. #427
    Senior Member javal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Írebro, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Monark sportser 1970, Monark sportser 1970ish, Monark folder, Mustand 1985, Monark Tempo 1999, Monark 318 1975, Crescent 319 1979, Crescent 325 c:a 1965, Crescent Starren 2002 (hybrid/sport), Nordstjernan 1960`s cruiser.
    Posts
    1,318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Luddit; well no, just some artistic/futuristic shape. The bike is alright - I┤m a C&V rider and the "newish" 2002 Crescent helps me through the winter!
    the rider makes the bike - steel club member 198

  3. #428
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Luddite View Post


    Don't have a cat bike guardian, I have a dog bike guardian. Note the freshly baked cookies on top of the oven, eh?

    I'm starting a new trend, bikes in front of stoves.
    Ditch the BF<g> I'll be there in... how many days will it take me to peddle from NYC to Vancouver? Some cookies and some love from the guiardian would suit me just fine!

    Oh wait... I did that once, only there was a big motor between my 2 wheels. Most of Saskatchewan had terrible side winds, even under some significant power, had to ride almost 45║ to the north wind.

    Never mind!
    1991 Trek 750 Multitrack Hybrid

  4. #429
    Senior Member javal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Írebro, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Monark sportser 1970, Monark sportser 1970ish, Monark folder, Mustand 1985, Monark Tempo 1999, Monark 318 1975, Crescent 319 1979, Crescent 325 c:a 1965, Crescent Starren 2002 (hybrid/sport), Nordstjernan 1960`s cruiser.
    Posts
    1,318
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In the 60┤and 70┤s when the cyclesport grew rapidly here in Sweden, different kinds of bikes were built to meet different demands. In Sweden it was quite common to get something speedy for exercise, something that could duplicate as a commuter and utility bike (they were often seen on amateur runnings). I think thats the core of the hybrid conception. Thats why I┤ll contribute my Monark "semi-roadbike" from early 70┤s! (Its a bit small for me, but I cant flip such a nice bike...)
    Attached Images Attached Images
    the rider makes the bike - steel club member 198

  5. #430
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    OK, here is my baby out on my terrace... hmmm, I DO need to take some water and soap to her...

    1991 Trek 750 Multitrack Hybrid

  6. #431
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Panthers007 View Post
    65'er - Trek isn't calling the carboniferous 7.9 FX a Hybrid anymore. They finally figured it out: Their warranty would drown 'em in debt when people went off-roading on the carbon 7.9.

    The 7.9 FX is now a road-bike.
    Uh, they seem to be calling the fx series as "fitness" bikes. They call the 7xxx series hybrid, but those seem to be based on fx designs with cheaper components per price point and most have front suspensions.

    Personally, I find any bike that has tire widths between skinny road and fat MTB and gearing in the middle to be a hybrid.
    1991 Trek 750 Multitrack Hybrid

  7. #432
    Senior Member sh00k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Times Square
    Posts
    495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's funny that the madone 2.3 and the fx 7.7 are nearly (i know there are differences) identical....

    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes.../23,77fx,empty

    so i see no reason why the 7.9 wouldnt be comparable to an all tct carbon madone....

    i think it's funny how they also classify fitness bikes from other bikes... arent all bikes for fitness? LOL. the difference between the fx and madones is the frame geometry and handle bars... those are the biggest differences..... but both still killer rides.
    2009 Trek FX 7.2 (Blue) -- SOLD!
    2010 Trek FX 7.7 (White) -- SOLD!
    2011 Trek FX 7.3 (White) -- Haven't sold it yet! haha

  8. #433
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver View Post
    Was doing some serious polishing today...





    Love this bike, I need to find a handlebar like that.
    It's none of my business what other people think of me.

  9. #434
    Mrs. DataJunkie Luddite's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    My Bikes
    Asama "Luddite" and Kuwahara MTB from the 90s
    Posts
    1,534
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LMAO @ Riverside.

  10. #435
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That handlebar with the V-fork was popular on mountain-bikes in the early 1980's. Then they vanished. They were heavy and sometimes poorly manufactured. Not always, though. Whatever - that's a very nice looking machine!
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  11. #436
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    547
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They're called "bull moose" handlebars and they were indeed heavy. Most early mountain bikes had them -- I had one of the original Norco Bigfoot's and it had them.

  12. #437
    Great State of Varmint Panthers007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Dante's Third Ring
    Posts
    7,481
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Bull Moose, eh? Cool. I had those on my $200 Nashbar mtn. bike. The bike was canary-yellow. And they painted the handlebars, too! Ick!
    How do you keep an idiot in suspense?

  13. #438
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's none of my business what other people think of me.

  14. #439
    Zensunni Wanderer KShep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    SE GA USA
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The wheels have transformed it a bit. No off-roading.


    The small white tag I forgot to remove on one of the rear spokes indicates that the build is for a Clyde.




    The ride is slightly smoother that with the OE Bontys. Much more stable at speed in tighter radius turns.
    Last edited by KShep; 09-10-09 at 05:45 AM.
    2010 Carl Strong custom Ti road bike
    2011 Trek 7.9 FX
    1990 Trek 970 Hardtail

  15. #440
    Senior Member sh00k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Times Square
    Posts
    495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^ kshep! those wheels look awesome!!! you mind if i ask you how much they ran you? how much of a difference is there between those and the bontrager race wheels that came stock on it?

    thanks.
    2009 Trek FX 7.2 (Blue) -- SOLD!
    2010 Trek FX 7.7 (White) -- SOLD!
    2011 Trek FX 7.3 (White) -- Haven't sold it yet! haha

  16. #441
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KShep View Post
    The wheels have transformed it a bit. No off-roading.


    The small white tag I forgot to remove on one of the rear spokes indicates that the build is for a Clyde.




    The ride is slightly smoother that with the OE Bontys. Much more stable at speed in tighter radius turns.
    That thing looks awesome! The biggest performance gains can be had by upgrading the rotating mass and that looks like quite an upgrade. That thing looks mean as hell. My favourite here so far.

    The detractors that think hybrids don't deserve nice parts should be showing up here shortly.

    P.S. People use Zipp 404's as cyclocross wheels no reason you can't do light off road riding with them.
    Last edited by Saddle Up; 09-10-09 at 09:08 AM.
    It's none of my business what other people think of me.

  17. #442
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey shook, I'm curious why you went for the 7.7 and didn't go for the 7.9. Was it 99% the money differential?
    1991 Trek 750 Multitrack Hybrid

  18. #443
    Senior Member sh00k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Times Square
    Posts
    495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Riverside -

    if you look on page 3 of 'my new tre kfx 7.7' thread, i give a list of reasons why. the money was one reason but not one of the top reasons. trek has a limited warranty on their carbon frames (read: limited coverage) and that made me hesitate... why would i spend more $ on a bike that has less warranty coverage than the model right below?

    i was set on the 7.9 until i really looked into the details. i was getting such an awesome deal on the 7.9 ($500+ off of msrp) and that was one of my driving reaosns for wanting it but, after all was said and done, the 7.7 made for a better value from a variety of angles.
    2009 Trek FX 7.2 (Blue) -- SOLD!
    2010 Trek FX 7.7 (White) -- SOLD!
    2011 Trek FX 7.3 (White) -- Haven't sold it yet! haha

  19. #444
    Senior Member Riverside_Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC-UWS
    My Bikes
    Trek 750
    Posts
    377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't blame you, definitely much better value.

    Must say the 7.9 is a fantasy for me... something I'd probably only do if I won MegaMillions. BUT, purely as an exercise, I like "considering" it.

    What specific in the warranty bothered you? Was it length or damage covered for metal frames that wasn't for carbon? Other than that, are there other issues with carbon over their current aluminum? Things like prone to break where metal might bend?

    Ha, I have a little weather bug in the corner of my screen, wind is running 18 in CP, imagine what it's like on the Greenway?
    1991 Trek 750 Multitrack Hybrid

  20. #445
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sh00k View Post
    Riverside -

    if you look on page 3 of 'my new tre kfx 7.7' thread, i give a list of reasons why. the money was one reason but not one of the top reasons. trek has a limited warranty on their carbon frames (read: limited coverage) and that made me hesitate... why would i spend more $ on a bike that has less warranty coverage than the model right below
    shOOk sensible people that value their bikes and treat them properly like I'm sure you do don't have to worry about frame warranty. If Trek put out a defective line of carbon frames they would rectify the situation. Careless people break carbon frames. They don't fail under normal use. It's to the point now that if you crash and break your carbon frame you would have done the same with aluminum. This notion that carbon frames are some how more fragile is just wrong.

    I'm not saying this to criticize your purchase you did really well and bought the bike that made most sense to you I'm just getting increasingly frustrated by the misinformation on this forum regarding carbon framed hybrid bikes.

    The number one reason carbon frames fail are people forgetting they are attached to the roof of their car and they drive into their garage. Crunch! Number 2 are serious crashes. Crashing a bicycle regardless of the material is not a warranty issue. If you crash hard enough to break your carbon bike I think you have other issues more important to deal with.
    It's none of my business what other people think of me.

  21. #446
    Senior Member sh00k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Times Square
    Posts
    495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    trek had a 5-year replacement stipulation on their carbon frames. so if i did wreck within the 5 year period, i'd get a 'discount' on buying a new frame to replace the damaged one. what if i wreked the bike in the 6th year? then im on my own buying a carbon frame at full price.

    i know carbon is really strong - im not questioning it's fragility. but i felt a little uneasy spending more money and getting a "limited" warranty (limited on replacement frames, that is).

    in the end i saved money and got a bike that's just as kick ass as the 7.9. maybe in 20 years, when i run my 7.7 into the ground, i'll consider getting the 7.9 again


    i say we get some really rich people to buy a few 7.7's and 7.9's and throw them off 400-foot cliffs to see which frames are stronger... LOLOLOLOL
    2009 Trek FX 7.2 (Blue) -- SOLD!
    2010 Trek FX 7.7 (White) -- SOLD!
    2011 Trek FX 7.3 (White) -- Haven't sold it yet! haha

  22. #447
    Senior Member sh00k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Times Square
    Posts
    495
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the other thing -----

    this was another big reason i didnt go for the 7.9 -- it's too "plain" looking......

    the 2009 7.9 here in the US is sooo different than the 2009 7.9 in australia for instance. look at both models and you will see what i mean. i didnt like that the 7.9 looks essentially the same year after year so i wanted something a little different. now, however, the 2010 US and australian 7.9s look the same.... uninspired, IMO....
    Last edited by sh00k; 09-10-09 at 11:17 AM.
    2009 Trek FX 7.2 (Blue) -- SOLD!
    2010 Trek FX 7.7 (White) -- SOLD!
    2011 Trek FX 7.3 (White) -- Haven't sold it yet! haha

  23. #448
    I Love My Dream
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,023
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's none of my business what other people think of me.

  24. #449
    Senior Member WolfsBane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek 7100. Only addition is a Specialized Comp and Armadillos Nimbus tires.

    Welcome... to the house of Rock!!!

  25. #450
    Senior Member anaheim flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    mcallen, texas
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i am looking into the 7000.....how youlike your 7x00?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •