Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member Cyclepup's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Specialized Vita Sport vs. Trek 7.3 FX WSD

    I've decided to get a second bike for running errands and such. My choices have been narrowed down to these two. Which one would be the better value? I'm clueless as to component values or which frame material is better, etc. So, if the ride is equally enjoyable to me, can someone please tell me which one is the better buy?

    2009 Specialized Vita Sport or 2009 Trek 7.3 FX WSD? Their MSRP is $660/$640, respectively.

    Also, if you own one of these, your personal take on the bike is much appreciated!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Alberta,Canada.
    Posts
    800
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek has the slightly better shifters and much better rear derailer.My pick would be the Trek.Both are good choices though.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Cyclepup's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you, ddez!

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NY state
    My Bikes
    See Signature...
    Posts
    1,192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The carbon fork on the Vita is going to suck up a LOT more road buzz than the aluminum fork on the trek. My Sirrus has an aluminum fork, and the Allez I sold had a carbon fork. The allez dealt with rough roads a little nicer, but it also had much better quality tires on it, the carbon fork was certainly part of it, though. Overall my Sirrus is a very comfortable bike to ride, and I would imagine the Vita would be the same...

    IMO, The carbon fork is worth it. They really do help.

    But both are nice bikes from great companies, really can not go wrong.

  5. #5
    aka Phil Jungels Wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Aurora, IL
    My Bikes
    Road & Hybrid
    Posts
    5,451
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Doesn't that 7.3 have an elastomer "suspension" on that front fork? If so, it should do fine soaking up shocks and buzz, without robbing energy.

    I ride Specialized, because they "fit" me better; but, I really like that 7.3 for a nice bike for it's value and performance.

    edit: OOps, The elastomer is on the 7300, not the 7.3.

    Ride them both, and then decide which one is best for you. One should stand out as more comfortable, more ridable, and more wantable.

    The 7.3 really is a lot of value for the money.
    Last edited by Wanderer; 10-12-09 at 07:30 AM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,412
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Getting a carbon fork for the Sirrus shouldn't be an issue. A LBS should be able to do the swap.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East metro-Atlanta
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    Getting a carbon fork for the Sirrus shouldn't be an issue. A LBS should be able to do the swap.
    Correct, getting a carbon fork for a Sirrus shouldn't be an issue; especially since this thread is not about a Sirrus.
    Last edited by Barry in GA; 10-13-09 at 11:29 AM.

  8. #8
    ɹǝqɯǝɯ ɹoıuǝs wheeldeal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Earth
    My Bikes
    Huffy and Pacific
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ddez View Post
    ...and much better rear derailer.
    WRONG. Not much better. It's only one level up. You can buy a Deore RD for under $30 shipped.

    Quote Originally Posted by NormanF View Post
    Getting a carbon fork for the Sirrus shouldn't be an issue. A LBS should be able to do the swap.
    Getting a carbon fork on a CAAD9 wouldn't be an issue either. What's your point?

    The Vita will be the lighter bike of the two. The Vita has a carbon fork. I would definitely pick the Vita over the FX.

    You can easily upgrade the rear derailleur if you really wanted to. Sell the Alivio that came with the bike for $20. Buy a Deore LX for $50. Net cost of $30 would give you a "MUCH" better rear derailleur than the Trek. (MUCH better according to ddez....even though it's just one level better).

    When buying a bike, the most important items are the frame & fork. Then look at the crankset.

    Everything else can be had for cheap.

    If you start off with an inferior frame/fork.....but have good components, how are you going to upgrade in the future? I'm not saying the Trek is inferior.....but it's much cheaper to upgrade a $30 rear derailleur than to upgrade a $100 fork.
    http://i28.tinypic.com/nlapfo.gif
    ísʎɐʍǝpıs pǝuɹnʇ pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇıʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool ʎlqɐqoɹd noʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •