Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-27-09, 05:32 AM   #1
Bob Nichols
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Nichols's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Union City, TN
Bikes: Trek 7.5 FX, Trek Navigator 2.0
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
What size frame do I need?

I've been looking at the Trek FX 7.5, but don't know which size frame to get. I went to the LBS last week and got on a 17.5" and a 20". I didn't ride either since it was raining that day. The salesman said it looked like I was in between the two. I really felt more comfortable on the 17.5". I am 5'11" and leg length from crotch to floor is 30".
Bob Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 05:48 AM   #2
jacksbike
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Haven, CT area
Bikes: Trek 7.5 Hybrid, Trek 1.1 Road, Holdsworth touring,Raleigh International,Ritchey Commando,Italvega Speciallissimo,et.al.
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am 5'9 with a 30 inch inseam and ride a 17.5 of the same model. I have the seat post up about 5 inches . Best thing to do for yourself is to take both size bikes for a test ride to see what fits you best. Stand over height is important, but also horizontal reach from the seat to the stem.
jacksbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 05:48 AM   #3
JonathanGennick 
Senior Member
 
JonathanGennick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Bikes: Priority Bicycles Eight
Posts: 2,620
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
I would take a hard look at the 20" frame. At least try and get in a test ride before deciding. One of my early mistakes with bikes was to buy toward the lower of the possible sizes that I could fit. Too small a size results in a seat too high relative to the bars, and then in too much weight on your wrists.

I'm not saying that 20" is right for you. I'm just saying not to dismiss it out of hand.

You might also look at other brands and models. Another brand may have a similar bike sized at 19".
JonathanGennick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 07:50 AM   #4
Steve in MA
Senior Member
 
Steve in MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Western Massachusetts
Bikes: 2010 Specialized Roubaix comp (SRAM Rival), 2009 Trek 7.3FX, Early 80's steel frame Suteki road bike
Posts: 300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Nichols View Post
I am 5'11" and leg length from crotch to floor is 30".
I'm about the same size as you. My Trek 7.3FX is a 20" frame, and fits me perfectly. When I was trying it out at the LBS I did also try the 17.5" frame, and opted for the 20.

Overall I agree with the others....try them both, see which fits you better.
Steve in MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-09, 12:25 PM   #5
Wanderer
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp
Posts: 7,590
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
And, when you test the two different sizes, make sure that both are the same.

Check tires for the same pressure, same seat height from the ground, seat as level as possible, and as close as possible the handlebars should match. If there is anything wrong with brakes or shifters, have them adjust them right away.

Take them for as long a test ride as they will allow.

That way, you will be comparing apples to apples.... and you will find out if the longer reach is better for you, or not.
Wanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-09, 01:48 AM   #6
Lev2
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
[QUOTE=jacksbike;9932594]I am 5'9 with a 30 inch inseam and ride a 17.5 of the same model. I have the seat post...

That is about the height I am. Now my quandry is a listed 7.5fx Trek, "52 cm" as posted. Now are we talking top tube? My guess thus far: he has a 20". But I recall once a LBS telling me 54 cm is about right for me. WTF.

Oh yes. Does Trek size their bikes small?

--confused here
Lev2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-09, 05:24 PM   #7
ddez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta,Canada.
Bikes:
Posts: 800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I like frames on the larger side.Like my saddle as low into frame as i can get within reason.Stems can be changed for reach,so reach doesnt affect my decision too much.Bikes ride a little smoother the larger the frame i think.Just my preference.
Check the Rivendel site,whether you agree or not theres quite a bit of info on sizing there you might enjoy checking out.Just saying is all,dont need flack from those of you who dont agree with Lemond French style of fitting,as found on Riv site.
ddez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.