Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Scott Sub 20 2010 Frame Size

    I am considering buying a Scott Sub 20 but struggling to decide which frame size ie S v M. The problem is that the recommendation is a Small frame. Looking at the dimesions ie virtual top tube and down tube, these are smaller than a GT Aggressor that I already have. Does anyone have any experience on the frame size and in particular the Sub 20. I am 5' 7" and 29" inside leg and would appreciate any comments or experiences that you may have.

  2. #2
    on your left.
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    My Bikes
    Scott SUB 30, Backtrax MTB
    Posts
    1,802
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    get the medium. I'm 6'0 and I have a large Scott SUB 30 and it fits just based on the fact that I like a lot of drop.

    they run small.
    Quote Originally Posted by caloso View Post
    I learned this the hard way. They say that experience is the best teacher, but I would have been preferred to just read about it on the internet.

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by nahh View Post
    get the medium. I'm 6'0 and I have a large Scott SUB 30 and it fits just based on the fact that I like a lot of drop.

    they run small.
    Thanks. One question on the Sub 20. The 2010 model comes with an anodised finish but upon delivery the forks have verictical scratches on the outside at the wheen fixings also similar scratches at the top (see attachment). Could you tell me if you've had a similar experience.

    DG
    Attached Images Attached Images

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •