Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Need help deciding - New 2011 7.5 FX vs New 2009 GF Menodta...

    Originally I started off looking at Cannondale Quicks and then I stopped by another store and took a 7.3 fx for a spin. I felt right away that I liked it better then the Quick. Then I grabbed a 7.5 and loved it. I felt the shifting was much smoother.

    Before I left I saw they have a sale sign on a Mendota. I asked about it and they said they over bought a bunch of them and have some left. Basically the specs are almost identical to the 7.5 fx except it also has disc brakes and a carbon seat stay.

    Riding them they felt nearly identical. I did however prefer the newer Shimano Deora shifters on the Trek vs the older ones on the GF. They worked the same but I thought the newer ones looked nicer.

    The GF is on sale for $799, supposedly a $1000 + retail. The 7.5 is $889

    Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do you need the disc brakes? Commute/ride in rain snow, etc? If not, they aren't a huge selling point. Get the bike that feels more comfortable.

  3. #3
    Senior Member GaryPitts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gladeville, TN
    Posts
    478
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love my 2011 Mendota! Basically you trade the carbon fork of the Mendota for the hydraulic brakes of the 7.5. I don't know enough about the running gears to give any advice. Fork, hydraulics, or whichever one talks to you loudest. Your choice!

    (Oops... I was thinking the 7.5 disc. The regular 7.5 does have the carbon fork, so that makes it a harder choice.)
    Last edited by GaryPitts; 07-03-11 at 07:00 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Southeastern MA
    My Bikes
    1990 Univega Alpina, 2009 Specialized Dolce Elite, 2009 Jamis Coda Sport, 2010 Jamis Aurora
    Posts
    250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 on the Trek. Assuming disc brakes aren't needed, you will have a later model (by two years) with the ever-popular FX. If you decide to sell it down the line, that might be something to keep in mind. Let us know what you decide; photos are always appreciated.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Maryland
    My Bikes
    rockhopper, delta V, cannondale H300, Marin Mill Valley
    Posts
    5,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually they both have carbon forks and neither has hydraulic brakes. I'd much rather own the Gary Fisher. The forks remind me of Bontrager's Switchblades from 1987. Disc brakes are a lot cleaner and worry free. No black alloy braking debris on the rims is nice. Frequent fiddling with rim brake pads is not.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •