Bike Forums

Bike Forums (http://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Hybrid Bicycles (http://www.bikeforums.net/hybrid-bicycles/)
-   -   Need advice .. Trek 7.4 or 7.5 ??? (http://www.bikeforums.net/hybrid-bicycles/926573-need-advice-trek-7-4-7-5-a.html)

Byingjl 12-23-13 08:12 PM

Italia1970 is correct about the pricing... the best 'bottom line price' I can get on a 7.5 is $1000. It appears you found a bargain that's a winner for either choice.

Italia1970 12-23-13 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byingjl (Post 16354793)
Italia1970 is correct about the pricing... the best 'bottom line price' I can get on a 7.5 is $1000. It appears you found a bargain that's a winner for either choice.

right about which part?

Bill Kapaun 12-24-13 09:19 AM

I find it difficult to believe that a 48/11 high gear isn't high enough.
Personally, I'd get the 7.3FX and change the cassette & tires to something that would better fit my needs.

mrtuttle04 12-25-13 08:30 PM

The overall lower gearing on the 7.4 is better gearing for your situation. The 7.4 has smaller gears on the crank which is better for climbing while the 7.5 has larger gears on the crank which is better for top-end speed. Also the lower gearing will result in faster peddeling which means better cardio workout. The higher gears would be for building leg strenght.

giantcfr1 12-26-13 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrtuttle04 (Post 16358895)
The overall lower gearing on the 7.4 is better gearing for your situation. The 7.4 has smaller gears on the crank which is better for climbing while the 7.5 has larger gears on the crank which is better for top-end speed. Also the lower gearing will result in faster peddeling which means better cardio workout. The higher gears would be for building leg strenght.

The compact crankset will also give you an aerobic workout. The triple crankset will also give you leg strength.

mrtuttle04 12-27-13 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by giantcfr1 (Post 16359194)
The compact crankset will also give you an aerobic workout. The triple crankset will also give you leg strength.

You misrepresent what I say then use that misrepresentation to criticize me. I did not say you cannot get an aerobic workout on a compact crankset. Nor did I say you will not gain leg strength on a triple crankset. What I said is a crankset with higher gearing is better for gaining leg strength and a crankset with lower gearing is better for an aerobic workout. I stand by that statement.
Apparently you have nothing to do but to go around trying to find reasons to criticize people.

Wanderer 12-27-13 10:09 AM

I drew the same inferences from your statement; and, all CFR did, was to clarify(after quoting your complete post)................ Where's the rub?

giantcfr1 12-27-13 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrtuttle04 (Post 16361408)
You misrepresent what I say then use that misrepresentation to criticize me. I did not say you cannot get an aerobic workout on a compact crankset. Nor did I say you will not gain leg strength on a triple crankset. What I said is a crankset with higher gearing is better for gaining leg strength and a crankset with lower gearing is better for an aerobic workout. I stand by that statement.
Apparently you have nothing to do but to go around trying to find reasons to criticize people.

Sorry that you read my post as a form of criticizing you.
Let me clarify my post...
In my experiences of owning and also currently using a range of gearing, the gear ratios are for tackling different ascents / grades. In my opinion unless you are on a single speed, the gearing ratio on multiple geared bikes can be used for both forms of excersize.
mrtuttle accused me of having nothing to do but to go around trying to find reasons to criticize people. I appologise to all members I have personally critisized. I didn't realize my opinons equalled personal attacks or personal critisizm.
I will be careful in the future. m(. .)m

MacNasty 12-27-13 09:58 PM

+1 on the 7.4.

loimpact 12-28-13 11:17 AM

I would be torn. I would say the 7.4 with the Isozone frame damper part is cool. (I didn't get to ride a 7.5 so I can't say whether it makes a significant difference. To be sure, it's not really a "shock", it's just a "damper" and so may be more gimmick than reality but I think we could say similar things about front fork materials, blah, blah, etc.)

I'm not a fan of 28cm tires as I think the 32cm's are my favorite tire size (at least for hybrid) but that's my personal taste. In fact, dare I say a 32cm tire might (*might*) make up for the Isozone's damping & nullify the need for 7.5 anyway??? (except for any component upgrades you might like).

So in a nutshell, I guess I'm saying 7.4 too with a wandering eye for that Isozone damper which I can live without. ;)

Wanderer 12-28-13 11:42 AM

Since I had so many tire sizes to compare, I spent a day switching tires, just for comparisons. Started with a 45, and settled on a 40 for the rear, and a 35 for he front.

The 40 gave a real nice ride, and increased capacity. The 45 on the rear, was no improvement over the 40. The 35 on the front didn't sacrifice ride quality, but sure improved steering and handling.

35 on the rear, no improvement in anything, and poorer ride quality.

A 32 on the front made no difference compared to the 35. But, was slightly harder riding. I could feel the difference in my arms.

That is now my go to tire size ----- a 40 on the rear, and a 35 on the front. I love the mix.

Don't be afraid to mix sizes, to find what works the best for you.....

And, since they are both Schwalbe Marathon Supremes, you would have to look awfully close to know they are different sizes.

Byingjl 12-31-13 09:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Hello folks... thanks for the awesome advice and comments regarding my question. I made a decision between the 7.4 & 7.5 and choose the 7.4 (see pic attachment). Based on your feedback it seems like the 7.4 fits my needs best. I've said speed and distance is not a concern for me and a bike for cardio fitness suited me best (previous mild heart attack). The 7.5 appears to be a great bike but seems to be a bit more of a road bike than standard bike trail. I'm in the process of fine tuning the bike to fit me and the dealer is very dedicated to ensure I'm satisfied. Once again, thanks for the great feedback - it's been most helpful (with the exception of giantcfr1) !!! safe travels!

cbr9927 12-31-13 11:30 PM

Great choice in the 7.4. I think Trek has got the styling down and excellent components for the price, the grips and pedals are a step above the other big makers at the same pricepoint.

Lanovran 01-01-14 04:47 PM

Went with the "sepia" color on that one, eh? Not my favorite, but it kind of grows on ya. :P Anyway, I hope that you enjoy your new ride!

Byingjl 01-01-14 05:23 PM

Lanovran: Yep... not sure about the Sepia color either - but other choice (flat black) wasn't too appealing to me so went out on a limb with this one. Like you say though....it kinda grows on you. I almost went with the 7.5 simply due to a better color choice (gloss black) - but I didn't think it made good sense.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lanovran (Post 16373740)
Went with the "sepia" color on that one, eh? Not my favorite, but it kind of grows on ya. :P Anyway, I hope that you enjoy your new ride!


giantcfr1 01-02-14 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byingjl (Post 16371946)
...Once again, thanks for the great feedback - it's been most helpful (with the exception of giantcfr1) !!! safe travels!

(>_<)

daihard 01-02-14 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byingjl (Post 16371946)
Hello folks... thanks for the awesome advice and comments regarding my question. I made a decision between the 7.4 & 7.5 and choose the 7.4 (see pic attachment). Based on your feedback it seems like the 7.4 fits my needs best. I've said speed and distance is not a concern for me and a bike for cardio fitness suited me best (previous mild heart attack). The 7.5 appears to be a great bike but seems to be a bit more of a road bike than standard bike trail. I'm in the process of fine tuning the bike to fit me and the dealer is very dedicated to ensure I'm satisfied.

Excellent. Enjoy your new ride!

ColonelSanders 02-20-14 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wanderer (Post 16363965)
Since I had so many tire sizes to compare, I spent a day switching tires, just for comparisons. Started with a 45, and settled on a 40 for the rear, and a 35 for he front.

The 40 gave a real nice ride, and increased capacity. The 45 on the rear, was no improvement over the 40. The 35 on the front didn't sacrifice ride quality, but sure improved steering and handling.

35 on the rear, no improvement in anything, and poorer ride quality.

A 32 on the front made no difference compared to the 35. But, was slightly harder riding. I could feel the difference in my arms.

That is now my go to tire size ----- a 40 on the rear, and a 35 on the front. I love the mix.

Don't be afraid to mix sizes, to find what works the best for you.....

And, since they are both Schwalbe Marathon Supremes, you would have to look awfully close to know they are different sizes.

Thank you for this perspective, I'll probably do something quite similar when I get my hybrid.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:08 PM.