No swooning happening here over that bike or Hasselhoff chasing bad guys with it.
Originally Posted by Cyclosaurus
The ugliness is a theft prevention feature.
Originally Posted by Zenmaster2009
I bought a 2014 sirrus comp disc on Saturday. Its not here yet because my Local Store had to order it. If you are thinking about getting that bike make sure your local store already has it in your size or can get it in your size quickly. I take a L frame, but if i needed an XL i would have to wait until mid June to get it in that size, same thing with the comp carbon for $1,700 I couldn't get it until mid June so i went with the Comp Disc. This may help you make your decision. It actually saved me about $500.
I weigh 150# and ride a Trek FX-2. Are you saying that I could increase the efficiency of my riding just as much by losing 5# as compared to going with a 5# lighter bike. Every time I get on a lighter bike I just love the performance. I remember when I went from a heavier Schwinn to the Trek. I thought I was in heaven
Originally Posted by loimpact
Indeed, and I'm still not 100% sold that there's just no difference whatsoever, but if you'd care to read the thread I started on top of whatever else is out there on the web, it's certainly a constant debate......
Originally Posted by B2mac
Yet another weight discussion......Bike weight vs bodyweight.....
It's not unlike the current science talking about how 23mm tires running 120psi might not be faster-rolling than, say a 28mm tire running 85psi.
All of these things are hard for my mind to digest, but maybe it's just so???