Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-14, 01:03 PM   #1
nicia
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Specialized Vita vs. Trek 7.2 FX WSD

Hi everyone,

I'm new here and am excited to be finally getting a bike. My boyfriend and I will do mostly paved trail riding. We are looking at hybrids. I have it narrowed down to the Specialized Vita or the Trek 7.2 FX WSD. These are both 2015 models that I test rode at our LBS.

I'm having problems deciding because I really like the sportier setup of the Specialized, yet I tend to feel the road vibrations more when compared to the Trek. Could this be that the Trek has a different saddle that may absorb shock? Also, the Trek comes with a dorky brown saddle and grips, which I hate. The Specialized saddle and grips are much more comfortable to me. However, I like the metal pedals of the Trek.

Should I go with the Trek and change out the saddle and grips? Or should I get the Specialized? Also, is there any advantage with one or the other in terms of durability?


Thanks
nicia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 01:28 PM   #2
mcmoose
Senior Member
 
mcmoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Transplanted to PDX area
Bikes: Trek FX 7.3 WSD, Trek Lexa S, Trek Lexa SLX
Posts: 432
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This are both fine, durable, entry-level hybrids. You can't go wrong with either one.

Do you know if your LBS inflated the tires the same on the two bikes? That can affect how much vibration you feel. Did you feel more at the handlebars of the Vita as well, or just in the saddle?

You have the right idea that you can always swap out components (though at a certain point, you really bought the wrong bike). It would be easy and inexpensive to swap new pedals onto the Vita (less than new grips and saddle onto the 7.2). You can't simply swap frame color or the fit and feel of the bike, so I would say those factors should be primary.

Good luck and have fun!!
mcmoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-14, 04:39 PM   #3
Raivyn
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The Trek has 35c tires while the Specialized has 32c tires. Maybe you felt the difference?

I do not believe either has the advantage in terms of frame durability, though the Trek site says the FX 7.2 has an Alivio rear derailer, which is better than the Altus derailer on the Specialized.

The Trek can be modified to be "sportier", and the Specialized can be modified to be more comfortable. The cost to make either bike what you want will really depend on what you chose to change to.

From what I've noticed in other posts and my own personal experience, folks tend to switch out grips and saddles for body specific comfort/fit issues, while pedals are switched out for either changes to clipless or from plastic to metal for better grip. Tires can be switched out, too for either a faster or softer ride.

FWIW I change the grips and saddles on all my bikes because I prefer Ergon grips and Terry Butterfly saddles, so the stock ones are not a determining factor for me.
Raivyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-14, 02:39 PM   #4
nicia
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thank you both for your help and advice. I will be visiting my LBS this evening... I bet they're sick of seeing me by now! Hopefully, I will have one picked out soon
nicia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-14, 02:51 PM   #5
Wanderer
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp
Posts: 7,552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
When I am interested in a bike, I look for the ability to mount fatter tires, and fenders and racks --- something to consider if you ever ride when the sun ain't shining.
Wanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-14, 09:26 PM   #6
fvfvsix
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think I may have some insight that will help... I spent some time recently cross-shopping the Sirrus and the Trek FX line, and there are a couple of things I noticed. First, the 7.2FX has a steel fork - this, more than anything, will contribute to the difference in comfort up front. Also, the 7.2 has a more upright geometry than the Vita/Sirrus, which seemed to help a lot with comfort in the saddle.

My impression of the two was that the Specialized Vita/Sirrus was a faster, nicer looking bike, but with a more "nervous" ride. The 32c tires didn't seem to help much with comfort. The Trek was more comfortable, but not as quick. Just to throw a wrinkle in your comparison, both lines actually have three different frames that they call "FX" or "Vita". For example, the Specialized has the base model with the "A1 Aluminum" frame. One level up has the "E5 Aluminum" frame. Beyond that, there is a full carbon version. Trek, of course, has the base FX frame, one with seat stay inserts, and a full carbon version as well.

IMHO, it is totally worth it to go for the E5 frame on the Vita/Sirrus model (which is what I ultimately did). It is a lighter, more compliant frame...and the rim brake model has a carbon fiber fork. It's much more comfy than either of the base frames. If you have to stay in the $500 range, then the FX will be the better option than the Specialized.
fvfvsix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-15, 11:18 AM   #7
ckhatib
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
what did u decide??

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicia View Post
Hi everyone,

I'm new here and am excited to be finally getting a bike. My boyfriend and I will do mostly paved trail riding. We are looking at hybrids. I have it narrowed down to the Specialized Vita or the Trek 7.2 FX WSD. These are both 2015 models that I test rode at our LBS.

I'm having problems deciding because I really like the sportier setup of the Specialized, yet I tend to feel the road vibrations more when compared to the Trek. Could this be that the Trek has a different saddle that may absorb shock? Also, the Trek comes with a dorky brown saddle and grips, which I hate. The Specialized saddle and grips are much more comfortable to me. However, I like the metal pedals of the Trek.

Should I go with the Trek and change out the saddle and grips? Or should I get the Specialized? Also, is there any advantage with one or the other in terms of durability?


Thanks
Hi! I'm looking at the same bikes as you and trying to decide which one to buy. Just curious which one you decided on and if you liked it!
ckhatib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-15, 11:43 AM   #8
ckhatib
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
what did u decide??

Quote:
Originally Posted by nicia View Post
Hi everyone,

I'm new here and am excited to be finally getting a bike. My boyfriend and I will do mostly paved trail riding. We are looking at hybrids. I have it narrowed down to the Specialized Vita or the Trek 7.2 FX WSD. These are both 2015 models that I test rode at our LBS.

I'm having problems deciding because I really like the sportier setup of the Specialized, yet I tend to feel the road vibrations more when compared to the Trek. Could this be that the Trek has a different saddle that may absorb shock? Also, the Trek comes with a dorky brown saddle and grips, which I hate. The Specialized saddle and grips are much more comfortable to me. However, I like the metal pedals of the Trek.

Should I go with the Trek and change out the saddle and grips? Or should I get the Specialized? Also, is there any advantage with one or the other in terms of durability?


Thanks
Hi! I'm looking at the same bikes as you and trying to decide which one to buy. Just curious which one you decided on and if you liked it!
ckhatib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-15, 11:22 AM   #9
nicia
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhatib View Post
Hi! I'm looking at the same bikes as you and trying to decide which one to buy. Just curious which one you decided on and if you liked it!
I decided to go with the Specialized Vita. It really came down to aesthetics for me. I just thought the Vita looked "sportier"
nicia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-15, 11:38 AM   #10
squatchout
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Bikes: '15 Trek 7.2 FX
Posts: 87
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raivyn View Post
I do not believe either has the advantage in terms of frame durability, though the Trek site says the FX 7.2 has an Alivio rear derailer, which is better than the Altus derailer on the Specialized.
The 2014 7.2 FX models (which were a little more expensive) did have the Alivio rear deraileur and the "gold" level frame, but the 2015 switched to the Acera rear deraileur and "silver" level frame. The Vita and 7.2 FX are basically completely equal bikes other than the pedals.
squatchout is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM.