Commuting 26 miles in 91 minutes
#26
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
My point ... nothing within walking distance. Most people aren't going to cycle that far.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 259
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Man thats what i was thinking that would be like an average speed of 27-30mph for the 50 min -55 min time and like 450-500 watts average if it was perfectly flat also depending on weight. He must be some ex tour defrance to keep speeds like that.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
The origional distance is doable on a bike however. 26 miles in 91 minutes would be a recreational cruise of under 18 mph.
#29
Prefers Cicero
The considerations were always made for family, job opportunity and security. Transportation mode was never a primary consideration. Though at one point I did hope our society would embrace small motorcycles and scooters like some Asian and Medetrainian countries but it soon became clear our business model was unlikely to ever let that happen.
#30
Prefers Cicero
I paid a lot to buy a house fairly centrally located in a large city so I could take the subway to work, and being able to bike was a happy by-product, triggered by a transit strike. For 20 years I had a 28 minute bike commute. I could have gone much faster, but since my commute in is mostly gently downhill, I found I could coast in at a leisurely pace without sweating on all but a handful of the hottest days. However we were financially strapped early on as a result of the location. A couple of years ago the office moved to a more distant site, now 45 min by bike, and fortunately still mostly downhill. I don’t mind the extra biking, but on days I take public transit, it is now a slightly wasteful 75 minutes. However, I do get to read standing up in the subway, or surf the net or clear work emails on my phone when above ground. It will pick up in a year, when a major disruptive construction project that impedes what should be my best transit route is done, and in two years, at age 65, I plan to start working part-time at home and doing more weeks of northern consulting, so I'll go to the downtown office maybe 30% less.
So my initial choice gave me the option to be car-light, or even maybe car-free if my wife had been okay with it, but it came with a big cost, and when the job moved, i was lucky I could still manage.
So my initial choice gave me the option to be car-light, or even maybe car-free if my wife had been okay with it, but it came with a big cost, and when the job moved, i was lucky I could still manage.
#31
Sophomoric Member
Or if you happen to be able to acquire a place for a reasonable price near your employment. Downtown areas, where a large number of jobs are located, are usually very pricey ... and industrial parks, where a large number of jobs are located, often don't have housing nearby.
I live less than two miles from downtown, which has huge office buildings as well as hospitals, major insurance companies and one of GM's largest auto assembly plants. But my rent is very reasonable. You need to look around to find good bargains and be realistic about what you will find in a given area. For some people who want short non-car commutes, the answer might be changing jobs rather than changing houses. As in any city, there are thousands of housing units within easy cycling distance of work, and hundreds within easy walking distance. It's just a matter of doing a little legwork to find them.
I think it's good to always be exploring your city on bike or on foot, so that you have good knowledge of the neighborhoods and the housing stock. You notice these things a lot more if you're walking or cycling, rather than zipping by in a car or looking at internet listings. On recent walks, I have seen more than a dozen nice looking rentals and houses for sale that were advertised only by a little sign on the porch. I probably never would have seen them if I had been driving, and they weren't listed on the internet.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 08-28-15 at 08:46 AM.
#32
Senior Member
- I lived in a town and my job was 6mi away. I did the bike commute every so often, but did not make a habit of it. In retrospect, I should have, but it just was not on my mind at the time. Point is, very doable to have gone car-lite at that point in my life, even though I was married, two drivers, two cars. +Motorcycles.
- That company moved the office from town to a major city 75mi away. We had just built a house in town. Commute time via car was 1.5-2hrs; 2+ hrs if I parked at mile 10, took a bus to the city, and walked a mile on the other end, which became my commute method of choice.
- Life changes happened, and I moved to the city where a 7mi commute took 45 min by car, 40 min utilizing the subway, or 25 min by bike. So I started bike commuting on a regular basis.
- More life changes, and I moved back out of the city even further than previous -- instead of increasing my commute, I took a lower paying job I could bike to.
While bike commuting from a suburb, I thought I was really putting one over on most other people living in the city. Far enough out not to be paying downtown urban rent, close enough to bike, bike commute shorter than all other modes. Could not comprehend why more people didn't do it, but was not complaining about the lack of bike commuters -- if everyone started bike commuting, would we appreciated the resulting cycling congestion...? How would we deal with cycling traffic jams?
I think emphasizing the economy of bike commuting would go a long way toward getting more people doing it, but it will still be an uphill battle against cultural norms of the day.
#33
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 596 Times
in
329 Posts
In many (most) cities the most expensive housing is downtown ... that's just common knowledge. And yes, of course it was the case with me.
It's great if you're the rare person who can live within easy walking distance of everything, but the fact of the matter is ... most people can't. And it is a bit glib and flippant to suggest that people should just move to be in a convenient location so that they can become car free. That's a change that people often can't make for a whole lot of reasons.
Think about it ... can you just pack up and move to a different place? Suppose you were transferred to a hospital on the far side of Toledo ... would you be able to pack things up and go there? Or would it be more convenient and cost-effective for you to stay where you are, at least for the time being.
Sure, if you care about being car-free or car-light, you will of course make every attempt to select the best possible place (seems to me, I started a thread about that: https://www.bikeforums.net/living-car...lace-live.html ) ... but even then, it may not be possible for a family to select the perfect place because, again, the fact of the matter is that people don't necessarily all work in the same location.
I am much more supportive of less dramatic changes ... the small steps we can take. Encouraging people to walk to their local grocery stores once in a while instead of driving all the time. Encouraging people to park in one location and walk to all the shops around, rather than driving to each and every one, and trying to find parking outside the front door. Encouraging people to use public transportation where available.
It's great if you're the rare person who can live within easy walking distance of everything, but the fact of the matter is ... most people can't. And it is a bit glib and flippant to suggest that people should just move to be in a convenient location so that they can become car free. That's a change that people often can't make for a whole lot of reasons.
Think about it ... can you just pack up and move to a different place? Suppose you were transferred to a hospital on the far side of Toledo ... would you be able to pack things up and go there? Or would it be more convenient and cost-effective for you to stay where you are, at least for the time being.
Sure, if you care about being car-free or car-light, you will of course make every attempt to select the best possible place (seems to me, I started a thread about that: https://www.bikeforums.net/living-car...lace-live.html ) ... but even then, it may not be possible for a family to select the perfect place because, again, the fact of the matter is that people don't necessarily all work in the same location.
I am much more supportive of less dramatic changes ... the small steps we can take. Encouraging people to walk to their local grocery stores once in a while instead of driving all the time. Encouraging people to park in one location and walk to all the shops around, rather than driving to each and every one, and trying to find parking outside the front door. Encouraging people to use public transportation where available.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Last edited by Machka; 08-28-15 at 09:17 AM.
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
I'm not sure exactly what benefit it would have to denote wage levels in this way but it would create an incentive for shortening commutes. Of course, it could also create an incentive to drive instead of biking or walking in situations where doing so would take less time, but if commuting by walking or biking could be reclassified as a fitness/leisure activity, then it would shorten people's commuting time to bike/walk closer to the official starting point of their commute, which would be where their bike ride or walk/jog/hike ends.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,355
Mentioned: 90 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8084 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
13 Posts
I think emphasizing the economy of bike commuting would go a long way toward getting more people doing it, but it will still be an uphill battle against cultural norms of the day.
"Free your mind, and the rest will follow" - En Vogue 1992
#36
Sophomoric Member
In many (most) cities the most expensive housing is downtown ... that's just common knowledge. And yes, of course it was the case with me.
It's great if you're the rare person who can live within easy walking distance of everything, but the fact of the matter is ... most people can't. And it is a bit glib and flippant to suggest that people should just move to be in a convenient location so that they can become car free. That's a change that people often can't make for a whole lot of reasons.
Think about it ... can you just pack up and move to a different place? Suppose you were transferred to a hospital on the far side of Toledo ... would you be able to pack things up and go there? Or would it be more convenient and cost-effective for you to stay where you are, at least for the time being.
Sure, if you care about being car-free or car-light, you will of course make every attempt to select the best possible place (seems to me, I started a thread about that: https://www.bikeforums.net/living-car...lace-live.html ) ... but even then, it may not be possible for a family to select the perfect place because, again, the fact of the matter is that people don't necessarily all work in the same location.
I am much more supportive of less dramatic changes ... the small steps we can take. Encouraging people to walk to their local grocery stores once in a while instead of driving all the time. Encouraging people to park in one location and walk to all the shops around, rather than driving to each and every one, and trying to find parking outside the front door. Encouraging people to use public transportation where available.
It's great if you're the rare person who can live within easy walking distance of everything, but the fact of the matter is ... most people can't. And it is a bit glib and flippant to suggest that people should just move to be in a convenient location so that they can become car free. That's a change that people often can't make for a whole lot of reasons.
Think about it ... can you just pack up and move to a different place? Suppose you were transferred to a hospital on the far side of Toledo ... would you be able to pack things up and go there? Or would it be more convenient and cost-effective for you to stay where you are, at least for the time being.
Sure, if you care about being car-free or car-light, you will of course make every attempt to select the best possible place (seems to me, I started a thread about that: https://www.bikeforums.net/living-car...lace-live.html ) ... but even then, it may not be possible for a family to select the perfect place because, again, the fact of the matter is that people don't necessarily all work in the same location.
I am much more supportive of less dramatic changes ... the small steps we can take. Encouraging people to walk to their local grocery stores once in a while instead of driving all the time. Encouraging people to park in one location and walk to all the shops around, rather than driving to each and every one, and trying to find parking outside the front door. Encouraging people to use public transportation where available.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#37
Senior Member
Uh-huh. And how do we commence with eradicating corporately-funded media influence on socio-cultural norms...?
#38
Senior Member
Funny, for years my commute was 25 miles and it never took more than 70 minutes, and usually took something like 50-55 minutes door to door by bike. Of course, it was inter-city with few traffic controls. My neighbors who did the same commute took about the same amount of time, so it wasn't at all out of the ordinary to ride at such speeds. (One of them did 'cheat" by using a tandem to drop his wife off on the way.")
These distances are just fine by bike. In fact, in many places the roads have become so congested that it is just as fast to commute 25 miles by bike as it is to do so by car, as long as there is reasonable bike parking at the office. The fact that most (almost all?) Americans choose to sit in traffic doesn't mean that riding isn't feasible, it just means that Americans are either lazy or stupid.
These distances are just fine by bike. In fact, in many places the roads have become so congested that it is just as fast to commute 25 miles by bike as it is to do so by car, as long as there is reasonable bike parking at the office. The fact that most (almost all?) Americans choose to sit in traffic doesn't mean that riding isn't feasible, it just means that Americans are either lazy or stupid.
I'm guessing this was your neighbor?
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scalarville
Posts: 1,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Except on the 41, 25 miles is 50 minutes is not really believable. The fastest TT'er in our group can do 40k (25 mi) in 52 min or so with 1 turnaround. IIRC that's like 360W sustained for him.. I'm in my 50's and somewhat overweight and can do 40k in a little over an hour in a TT (but I have a very fast recumbent). Commuting? With traffic? Maybe 18-20 mph if I were pushing it. Add in stops, hills etc, or riding a road bike, and the average goes down of course.
Here, there's a lot of reverse commuting (live in the city, work in the 'burbs). So the commute is bad both ways.
Here, there's a lot of reverse commuting (live in the city, work in the 'burbs). So the commute is bad both ways.
Last edited by delcrossv; 08-28-15 at 12:39 PM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex
Posts: 5,058
Bikes: 2013 Haro FL Comp 29er MTB.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1470 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
Cooker:
I was talking business model in dress and social functions for the higher paying positions. I stopped riding a bicycle when I moved into an office position that had a dress code and close contact with fellow workers and customers.
I stopped riding my motorcycles when I got in mid management and the dress code required a tie.
At that point not only were there office appropriate wardrobes but standards for meetings and customer presentations.
Customers do not expect you to arrive for a meeting or for a business lunch on a scooter even if in some countries it would be acceptable.
For several years one company even provided some managers with cars or at least paid for the gas. But they wouldn't provide a scooter or motorcycle. They did pay well however.
I was talking business model in dress and social functions for the higher paying positions. I stopped riding a bicycle when I moved into an office position that had a dress code and close contact with fellow workers and customers.
I stopped riding my motorcycles when I got in mid management and the dress code required a tie.
At that point not only were there office appropriate wardrobes but standards for meetings and customer presentations.
Customers do not expect you to arrive for a meeting or for a business lunch on a scooter even if in some countries it would be acceptable.
For several years one company even provided some managers with cars or at least paid for the gas. But they wouldn't provide a scooter or motorcycle. They did pay well however.
#41
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I cycle-commuted 29 miles each way for a year or so. It was a slightly hilly route. It typically took me 1 hour and 40 minutes, I could get it under 1:35 if I pushed it a bit. My workplace had showers and facilities to store a change of clothes, which made it practicable
I've probably never been fitter than I was that year, and I really enjoyed it. But the fact is that most people couldn't accommodate that, it's physically very demanding to ride 300 miles per week at a decent pace. And whatever one's mode of transport, spending well over three hours per day commuting is a big chunk of time.
I've probably never been fitter than I was that year, and I really enjoyed it. But the fact is that most people couldn't accommodate that, it's physically very demanding to ride 300 miles per week at a decent pace. And whatever one's mode of transport, spending well over three hours per day commuting is a big chunk of time.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
Quite frankly, I don’t care because I’m sleeping for 1.0 hour! Let me tell you, it really makes a huge difference once I arrive I’m refreshed. I may have had a bad night sleeping but that extra hour of sleep on the bus really makes a difference. I also take another 15 minute subway ride and guess what I’m doing? Sleeping! LOL
By the time I arrive at work, I had an extra 1.20 hour of sleep. Now if I had to drive or ride a bicycle, that time would have to be spent totally focused on the road. Having been a bike commuter I prefer the way things are today.