Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    meep! legot73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    My Bikes
    2006 Kona Jake, 2005 Giant Lite Xtracycle, 2004 Trek L200, 1997 Specialized RockHopper FS, 1989 Trek 950
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Want to save the planet, off yourself?

    I understand the naive academic observation, but the bicycle element is aggrevating. A treadmill might be a better illustration since bicycling is often a productive substitute for burning fossil fuels:

    And such a good school, too.

    http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archiv...ycling_de.html
    Nothing says "in good times and in bad" like a good pair of fenders

  2. #2
    Dare to be weird!
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Austin TX
    My Bikes
    Hybridized 1970s Coppi road bike; Townie city cruiser
    Posts
    1,990
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I looked at the professor's paper.

    Like physicist Wolfgang Pauli once said, "This isn't right, it isn't even wrong."

    However, it does make one environmentally significant point. Reduction of per capita resource requirements doesn't solve problems that are fundamentally caused by overpopulation.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5,361
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    yup, ever look at a world population growth chart? its scary to say the least, then factor in how many resources we americans use and just try to imagine the rest of world doing the same !!!!!!! not physically possible

  4. #4
    Old fart redden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    02 Specialized Allez, Cannondale M700
    Posts
    611
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He's probably a member of this church

    http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/

  5. #5
    meep! legot73's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    My Bikes
    2006 Kona Jake, 2005 Giant Lite Xtracycle, 2004 Trek L200, 1997 Specialized RockHopper FS, 1989 Trek 950
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with the overpopulation issue, but I think its a stretch to tie it to cycling. Why not advances in health care, new drugs, mismanaged welfare, anitquated views on birth control by religious groups, or something more relevant.

    Not to be morbid, but I don't see any consideration for a "cycling related deaths" adjustment for this long-living population of cyclists. I just view the cycling link as reckless conjecture, but coming from Wharton, some relatively intelligent people might just buy it.

    I'm just venting.
    Nothing says "in good times and in bad" like a good pair of fenders

  6. #6
    Old fart redden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    02 Specialized Allez, Cannondale M700
    Posts
    611
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He's probably a member of this church

    http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/

  7. #7
    gwd
    gwd is offline
    Biker gwd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    DC
    My Bikes
    one Recumbent and one Utility Bike
    Posts
    1,917
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Platy
    I looked at the professor's paper.

    Like physicist Wolfgang Pauli once said, "This isn't right, it isn't even wrong."

    However, it does make one environmentally significant point. Reduction of per capita resource requirements doesn't solve problems that are fundamentally caused by overpopulation.
    The paper came up earlier in the "Bikes and Health" thread. His results are sensitive to his assumptions and it looks like he assumes you own a car, if you
    don't own a car or some of his other numbers are off he would get other results. Also, he's making assumptions about energy use decades in the future without any discounting. He's counting certain energy savings today against uncertain expenditures in the future. As a professor at Wharton he should know better. If the peak oil people are right or even close most car owners today won't be able to burn energy at the same rate 40 years from now.

    Overpoplulation will correct itself of course, it would be nice if we came up with a more pleasant way to do it than war, disease, starvation or pollution.

  8. #8
    Mad scientist w/a wrench
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chucktown
    My Bikes
    none working atm
    Posts
    760
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm getting sick of this "old age causes overpopulation" crap. Did anyon ever take a demography (sociology of populations) class?

    The population boom wasn't just caused by the added longevity that resulted from the across-the-board drop in mortality thanks to germ-theory and modern medicine. it was caused by the LACK of a drop in birth-rate. wanna know why the US and europe import guest workers? among other reasons its because our native populations are all decreasing because of the decreased birthrates that have happened because of widespread education and sex-ed. we know for a fact that when you properly educate a population, the overpopulation problem begins to correct itself.

    so get it straight...overpopulation isn't caused by living longer, its caused by a a lag between the decrease of mortality rates and the resultant decrease of birth rates.

    the pleasant solution qwd is looking for is simple: birth control. (and I don't mean abstinence...)
    Proudly wearing kit that doesn't match my frame color (or itself) since 2006.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •