Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member donrhummy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Uh....Dumb Prize?

    Wouldn't the Tesla Roadster already beat this prize's requirements?

    http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2...e.html?ref=rss

  2. #2
    pj7
    pj7 is offline
    On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I believe that "practical " is the key word here, and a $100,000.00 car is not very practical.
    I am a sig Virus. Please put me in your sig so that I can continue to replicate.

  3. #3
    bicyclist LandLuger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    383
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Funny. . .I'm starting to feel like a broken record, but here goes. If someone were to build such a vehicle and it seated four adults then it would be lucky to get 100watt/hours per mile per person. My crappy homemade ebike gets 10-20 watt/hours per person without pedaling at all. Just another sad example of the intention to promote the car culture to the bitter end.

  4. #4
    Senior Member donrhummy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LandLuger
    Funny. . .I'm starting to feel like a broken record, but here goes. If someone were to build such a vehicle and it seated four adults then it would be lucky to get 100watt/hours per mile per person. My crappy homemade ebike gets 10-20 watt/hours per person without pedaling at all. Just another sad example of the intention to promote the car culture to the bitter end.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Roadster

  5. #5
    bicyclist LandLuger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    383
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Let me clarify. If someone were to build a four seater that got 100 miles on a gallon of gasoline that would be 34.6 MJ equivalent of gasoline per person. Divide this by 100 miles. Covert to watts. And you get a figure approaching 100watt/hours per mile per person. No, the Tesla wouldn't count because it's fueled on electrical potential and oil is king; didn't you know?

  6. #6
    Senior Member donrhummy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LandLuger
    Let me clarify. If someone were to build a four seater that got 100 miles on a gallon of gasoline that would be 34.6 MJ equivalent of gasoline per person. Divide this by 100 miles. Covert to watts. And you get a figure approaching 100watt/hours per mile per person. No, the Tesla wouldn't count because it's fueled on electrical potential and oil is king; didn't you know?
    Yes, I know, but many electricity sources are oil/gas.

    Aside from that, I believe this guy proves you're wrong.
    http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/showt...7923#post17923

    If he can get 70+ mpg with a crappy old 1992 Honda Civic, then they can get a modern car to get 100 mpg with 4 people in it.

  7. #7
    bicyclist LandLuger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    383
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You missed my point. I'm agreeing with you of course; the prize is total BS.

    "The guidelines specify that the car must be appealing to buyers. . ." Who the heck came up with that one?

    The only thing that would "appeal" to buyers in my neck of the woods is a 400 HP duelly pickup truck that gets 100MPG.

  8. #8
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    16,262
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LandLuger
    You missed my point. I'm agreeing with you of course; the prize is total BS.

    "The guidelines specify that the car must be appealing to buyers. . ." Who the heck came up with that one?

    The only thing that would "appeal" to buyers in my neck of the woods is a 400 HP duelly pickup truck that gets 100MPG.
    Build it an they will come? I dunno the ones around here like to brag about how much it costs to fill up

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

  9. #9
    Senior Member wahoonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    On the road-USA
    My Bikes
    Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG
    Posts
    16,262
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was thinking about this thread on the way into work today...(dangerous, I know) I can recall many cars I have had over the years that got 40+ mpg and could hold 4 plus people. It seems to me with today's technology it should be feasible to double that number. Problem is with marketing leading people to think they need heated seats, 250hp, V-6, etc, etc. I think if the auto manufacturers really put a economy car on the market and marketed it the way they do the 400hp trucks and SUV's they would eventually sell. Three cars that came to mind as being very economical were our late 60's Fiat Multipla, 1967 Renault R-10 and my 1978 Honda Civic 1200. All were awesome cars in their own way and got highway mileage in excess of 40mph at 55mpg. The Fiat was a electrical nightmare to work on, but I got by with a multi meter and a pair of wire cutters The Renault was an odd car, but very comfortable for the long haul if you weren't in a hurry. The Honda was a fantastic little city car, but not the best choice for longer trips due to it's short wheel base.

    Aaron
    Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

    ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

    "Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
    RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
    _Nicodemus

    "Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
    Aluminum: barely a hundred
    Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
    _krazygluon

  10. #10
    not a role model JeffS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donrhummy
    If he can get 70+ mpg with a crappy old 1992 Honda Civic, then they can get a modern car to get 100 mpg with 4 people in it.
    While the car looks beatup now, there was nothing "crappy" about that generation Civic. The VX model of the same period got even better mileage than this CX.

    We have generally taken a step backwards in gas mileage - primarily because of safety requirements. This civic weighed in at a little over 2000 lbs. A current-generation civic is approaching 3000. We're so obsessed with crash testing and how many airbags and cupholders we can cram in a car, that we're going the wrong way with fuel efficiency.

    Fifteen to twenty years ago, we could get 40+mpg from a compact car with ease. Now, with the exception of the Corolla, a car has to be a hybrid to get into that territory. - speaking of US market cars only. The state of the US auto industry is embarassing and socially and environmentally irresponsible. I honestly believe we would be much better off if "the big three" were to go away tomorrow.

  11. #11
    bicyclist LandLuger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    383
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffS
    We have generally taken a step backwards in gas mileage - primarily because of safety requirements. This civic weighed in at a little over 2000 lbs. A current-generation civic is approaching 3000. We're so obsessed with crash testing and how many airbags and cupholders we can cram in a car, that we're going the wrong way with fuel efficiency.
    Yeah, I know what you mean. Imagine my surprise when I looked up the curb weight of the wife's late model Nissan--almost 2,800lbs But can you blame the designers? They are just trying to make these compacts survivable in a land ruled by huge, lumbering, metal dinosaurs with distracted soccer moms at the helm.

  12. #12
    Pedaled too far. Artkansas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    La Petite Roche
    Posts
    12,251
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pj7
    I believe that "practical " is the key word here, and a $100,000.00 car is not very practical.

    Volume is the key. They cost $100,000.00 because there aren't many made. Make a million and watch the price go way down.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •