Living plane free...
#1
Senior Citizen
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2
Crankenstein
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Apologies if this is a repost, but it's just too kool fer skool.
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I'd hoped this was going to be a discussion of practical alternates to air travel. I've traveled by Amtrak when flying was more convenient simply because train travel is supposed to be 'greener.' That and I can move around on a train, rather than be strapped into an uncomfortable seat.
#5
Senior Citizen
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: no
Posts: 1,346
Bikes: yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Feel free to start a convo regarding all that if ya like... It's a fluff thread so just start typing, no worries.
#6
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Apologies if this is a repost, but it's just too kool fer skool.
As for me, I'm not plane-free. It might be nicer to take the train, and I have between San Diego and Seattle. But my employer would not approve of taking 2-3 days to go from Little Rock to Santa Cruz.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991
Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd hoped this was going to be a discussion of practical alternates to air travel. I've traveled by Amtrak when flying was more convenient simply because train travel is supposed to be 'greener.' That and I can move around on a train, rather than be strapped into an uncomfortable seat.
Amtrak, the U.S. passenger rail service, is a very comfortable riding experience. The coach seats are enormous and you can easily get up and walk around.
However, outside the Northeast region, Amtrak doesn't run on schedule. The trains are late about half the time. 3 hours late is typical. On the longer routes being a full day behind schedule is not uncommon. The only way to make Amtrak work is to constantly check for updated arrival information by telephone and to have a comfortable place to wait which is not too far from the rail station.
Greyhound, the major U.S. intercity bus service, runs on schedule but it's as uncomfortable as an airplane. A good sense of humor helps a lot. In general, Greyhound doesn't even come up to the level of comfort you experience with Mexican intercity bus services.
#8
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada eh
Posts: 136
Bikes: lots trust me too much to mention
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd hoped this was going to be a discussion of practical alternates to air travel. I've traveled by Amtrak when flying was more convenient simply because train travel is supposed to be 'greener.' That and I can move around on a train, rather than be strapped into an uncomfortable seat.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Service and trains were fine. Schedule was horrible. Philadelphia to Cleveland put me at The Mistake on The Lake at 4:00 AM. There's no daylight service to the city.
#10
Biscuit Boy
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Speeenard 'laska
Posts: 1,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Living in south central AK it's hard or impossible to find alternatives to the jets and planes. But on the plus side a bush plane requires vastly less infrastructure than a motor vehicle or train, and leaves little or no trace behind.
#11
jim anchower
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow the humanity! That's pretty cool.
Unfortunately outside the NE most people who travel by train, (like my mom,) make the train their actual destination, with the city as an equal or secondary destination.
I won't use Amtrak. My vacation time is valuable and I won't spend unknown hours and days sitting in the middle of nowhere. (For the same reason I'll pay more money to avoid an airline connection/potential delay) Maybe someday I'll do the Surfliner up California, but again that will be a trip in itself.
Unfortunately living out west if I'm traveling beyond the mountains for a weekend jaunt to Santa Fe or somewhere relatively close (again out west) planes are MY only option.
Maybe someday, (I can dream) cities like L.A. / S.F., Vegas, L.A. will be connected with rail. Or a good example Chicago to midwest cities. Fly to Chicago, take rail to Grand Rapids or Detroit.
But I'll vote for and support anyone who proposes to build me a U.S. version of this:
Unfortunately outside the NE most people who travel by train, (like my mom,) make the train their actual destination, with the city as an equal or secondary destination.
I won't use Amtrak. My vacation time is valuable and I won't spend unknown hours and days sitting in the middle of nowhere. (For the same reason I'll pay more money to avoid an airline connection/potential delay) Maybe someday I'll do the Surfliner up California, but again that will be a trip in itself.
Unfortunately living out west if I'm traveling beyond the mountains for a weekend jaunt to Santa Fe or somewhere relatively close (again out west) planes are MY only option.
Maybe someday, (I can dream) cities like L.A. / S.F., Vegas, L.A. will be connected with rail. Or a good example Chicago to midwest cities. Fly to Chicago, take rail to Grand Rapids or Detroit.
But I'll vote for and support anyone who proposes to build me a U.S. version of this:
#12
Lanky Lass
An interesting concept here! I keep thinking it would be nice to visit the relatives in San Jose, and I would like to take the Coast Starlight. However (bearing in mind that this information is from Wikipedia):
"In recent years, the train has gained the nickname Coast Starlate due to its abysmal on-time record. From October 2005 through August 2006 the train delivered its passengers on-time only 2% of the time, with trains consistently running 5 to 11 hours behind schedule."
Unfortunately, I can attest to that miserable performance, by having met my brother and his older son at King Street Station over three hours late on the one time he got here by Amtrak.
But, if I'm not in a hurry, do I really care?
East Hill
"In recent years, the train has gained the nickname Coast Starlate due to its abysmal on-time record. From October 2005 through August 2006 the train delivered its passengers on-time only 2% of the time, with trains consistently running 5 to 11 hours behind schedule."
Unfortunately, I can attest to that miserable performance, by having met my brother and his older son at King Street Station over three hours late on the one time he got here by Amtrak.
But, if I'm not in a hurry, do I really care?
East Hill
__________________
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
___________________________________________________
TRY EMPATHY & HAVE LOVE IN YOUR HEART, PERHAPS I'LL SEE YOU ON THE ROAD...
#14
Pedaled too far.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I suspect that if there was enough demand that the situation could be reversed.
#16
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
10 Posts
The New York MTA costs the city hundreds of millions in losses. There's no way the government would pay for such a costly system. Amtrak can't afford to run those money losing lines out west if your state does not want to invest in building tracks.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
I forgot out west, there is an Amtrak line that runs very well. How did they do it? The cities and states PAY for their service! That's the only way you're going to get good service is to pay for it.
The New York MTA costs the city hundreds of millions in losses. There's no way the government would pay for such a costly system. Amtrak can't afford to run those money losing lines out west if your state does not want to invest in building tracks.
The New York MTA costs the city hundreds of millions in losses. There's no way the government would pay for such a costly system. Amtrak can't afford to run those money losing lines out west if your state does not want to invest in building tracks.
#20
Senior Member
Just make sure they allow bikes on board, the Deutsche Bahn's InterCityExpress high-speed trains do not have space for bikes on board. The normal trains do however, and it makes for great bike touring.
#21
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Deleted
#22
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: st. pete, fla
Posts: 278
Bikes: royce union (univega) full susp mtb, work trike, assorted extra bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AllenG Not the very same ship; bit of comparing row boats to aircraft carriers. Also Santos-Dumont's ship was not coated in aluminum oxide.
"Same ship was displayed in my two pictures. Was your "row boat" filled with Hydrogen? "
it was the aluminum oxide that burned............jet fuel
"Same ship was displayed in my two pictures. Was your "row boat" filled with Hydrogen? "
it was the aluminum oxide that burned............jet fuel
#24
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by AllenG Not the very same ship; bit of comparing row boats to aircraft carriers. Also Santos-Dumont's ship was not coated in aluminum oxide.
"Same ship was displayed in my two pictures. Was your "row boat" filled with Hydrogen? "
it was the aluminum oxide that burned............jet fuel
"Same ship was displayed in my two pictures. Was your "row boat" filled with Hydrogen? "
it was the aluminum oxide that burned............jet fuel