Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Living Car Free
Reload this Page >

The Inalienable Right to Drive

Notices
Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

The Inalienable Right to Drive

Old 02-09-11, 07:01 AM
  #1  
Pedaled too far.
Thread Starter
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
The Inalienable Right to Drive

Georgia state Rep. Bobby Franklin, R-Marietta, has introduced a bill that would do away with drivers' licenses, arguing that they “are a throw back to oppressive times.”

In his bill, Franklin states, "free people have a common law and constitutional right to travel on the roads and highways that are provided by their government for that purpose. Licensing of drivers cannot be required of free people, because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of an inalienable right."

Well, we bicyclists have been saying all along that we have a right to travel on the road.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 09:35 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: wa
Posts: 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I appreciate the right being recognized, I dont want people with even less education driving.
busted knuckles is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:08 AM
  #3  
Bike addict, dreamer
 
AdamDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 5,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is he on f***ng drugs?!? Since when driving is a "right"?!? WHY DO WE HAVE RET**DS FOR POLITICIANS?!?!
AdamDZ is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:30 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
JayButros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 212

Bikes: 1983 Mirage

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
"Driving is a privilege, not a right"

...this was repeated to me about 1000 times before I was able to get a license.
JayButros is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:34 AM
  #5  
On a Mission from God
 
FunkyStickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thibodaux, LA
Posts: 2,010

Bikes: '10 Surly LHT, Rat-rod Klunker, '82 Peugeot PH12 Centennial

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
Is he on f***ng drugs?!? Since when driving is a "right"?!? WHY DO WE HAVE RET**DS FOR POLITICIANS?!?!
Cause we elected them... LOL.

Truthfully, driver's liceses hardly mean anything anymore. The driver's ed classes are a joke, and there are people driving around with licenses they got 60 years ago, before most of the current traffic laws were written.

I think they should make it even harder to get a license. They should re-test every year, they should limit the max speed of your car based on your driving skill and car's condition (like they do in Germany) and they should be able to revoke someone's license indefinitely if they abuse it.
FunkyStickman is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 11:12 AM
  #6  
Full Member
 
ezdoesit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 313

Bikes: Fuji Touring 2008

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
Is he on f***ng drugs?!? Since when driving is a "right"?!? WHY DO WE HAVE RET**DS FOR POLITICIANS?!?!
+1
ezdoesit is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 11:58 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Smallwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I'm in Helena Montana again.
Posts: 1,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I agree with the sentiment of the representative but the implementation would be difficult. If there were a way to identify the people with drunk driving convictions and keep them off the roads permanently then I'd be for his bill. If there were stringent testing and standards in place that would take into account elderly people, crazy people, epileptics and people with other medical conditions, then such a system might be able to work.

Everybody would need to carry an identification card. There would be no prohibitions for letting citizens drive and no regular license renewals. Upon being convicted of an offense the courts could require the stamping of the ID with whatever restrictions were necessary according to the offense. If the person was caught breaking the law or not obeying the restrictions such person would face arrest and jail.

As it is now drunk drivers usually continue doing it even after their first conviction. The ID system wouldn't be any different. It would just eliminate the licensing process. The drunks would again be caught and brought before a judge. Until they are taken off the road for the first conviction and jailed for the second I see no change in this area of driving.

Recently I got a commercial driver license. The DMV testing was on a computer and driving around. I can parallel park a bus. My company only required fifteen hours of behind the wheel training but I got one week. I completed over seventy hours of in class training. With so little on road experience I was let loose driving a bus load of passengers. I'm still learning and improving but I was allowed on the roads.

People are allowed to drive cars with very little training. It's amazing that there aren't more crashes.
Smallwheels is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 07:51 PM
  #8  
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,565

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
If you every run into a bunch of people who've lost their license due to drunk driving, you'll see that people believe they have an "inalienable" right to drive.

God, maybe it's times for the alien invasion.
gerv is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 08:02 PM
  #9  
Bike addict, dreamer
 
AdamDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 5,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gerv
If you every run into a bunch of people who've lost their license due to drunk driving, you'll see that people believe they have an "inalienable" right to drive.

God, maybe it's times for the alien invasion.
Aliens are most likely not interested. I bet there are better planets to invade, with intelligent lifeforms on them...
AdamDZ is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:02 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 64

Bikes: Jamis Coda, Trek 950 Single Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was talking with a friend recently about flying cars. They were supposed to be here by now. Every now and then you hear that some company has a prototype and it may happen soon. My friend pointed out that to operate one of those you would basically need a simple version of a pilots license with training. This would actually make driving (at least the flying cars) limited only to those smart enough to get the pilots license. Everyone else would use the mass transit piloted by someone with the license.

At least then if you were driving a flying car, you would know that most the people flying one near you had to be at least smarter than the people driving regular cars.
musikguy is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:37 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You know, I can get behind the idea that we all have a right to travel on the roads. Operating a motor vehicle on said roads is an entirely different issue.
CarFreeFam4 is offline  
Old 02-09-11, 10:43 PM
  #12  
Single-serving poster
 
electrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,098
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Stevie wonder is gonna love that law! Too bad we won't!

... coarse language

Will the state be covering your insurance bill?
electrik is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 12:52 AM
  #13  
nashcommguy
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: nashville, tn
Posts: 2,499

Bikes: Commuters: Fuji Delray road, Fuji Discovery mtb...Touring: Softride Traveler...Road: C-dale SR300

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is a ridiculous grab for some extended attention by a career politician who knows damn well his proposal is going to be tabled. Takes up the taxpayers' valuabletime/money w/this stupidity. Why don't these people work on meaningful legislative issues pertaining to their local district? One hopes this idiot is at the state level and not actually in Congress.

But, then again as stated many times here on BF 26th District NY State Representative Christopher Lee shows us all: This thread's no good without pictures!
nashcommguy is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 01:01 AM
  #14  
Lost Again
 
gitarzan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Columbus, Oh!
Posts: 1,044

Bikes: Soma Saga, 1991 Sirrus, Specialized Secteur Elite, Miele Umbria Elite.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nashcommguy
This is a ridiculous grab for some extended attention by a career politician who knows damn well his proposal is going to be tabled. Takes up the taxpayers' valuabletime/money w/this stupidity. Why don't these people work on meaningful legislative issues pertaining to their local district? One hopes this idiot is at the state level and not actually in Congress.

But, then again as stated many times here on BF 26th District NY State Representative Christopher Lee shows us all: This thread's no good without pictures!
+1000

Showboating for a stupid constituency.
gitarzan is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 02:50 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
zeppinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,016

Bikes: Giant FCR3, Surly LHT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CarFreeFam4
You know, I can get behind the idea that we all have a right to travel on the roads. Operating a motor vehicle on said roads is an entirely different issue.
+1
zeppinger is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 09:59 AM
  #16  
Pedaled too far.
Thread Starter
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
Aliens are most likely not interested. I bet there are better planets to invade, with intelligent lifeforms on them...
Not that we know of.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 10:30 AM
  #17  
Bike addict, dreamer
 
AdamDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 5,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Artkansas
Not that we know of.
That may be because we're not intelligent enough to find them Spending most of our resources on weapons and killing each other and destroying our own planet rather than on peaceful research and advancement probably puts us outside of the definition of "intelligent life".
AdamDZ is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 12:35 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 64

Bikes: Jamis Coda, Trek 950 Single Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I know this is getting off topic but this sub topic is really interesting too. I'll mention bikes to keep it relevant by saying that it would be interesting if aliens had all their superior knowledge and technology but did so without ever going the route of the wheel. They may find our bikes to be the most interesting thing they have ever found in the universe!

Back to the subtopic at hand: finding them or them finding us may be futile. Someone once framed it by asking what if a blind cave fish ever wanted to find the mythical human and make contact. Generations ago another fish swears he heard human voices in the cave. They feel like they are making progress and they may make contact any day now. They wonder why we haven't made contact with them yet.

We, like the blind cave fish, may be waiting a long time for first contact.
musikguy is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 12:52 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991

Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by musikguy
I know this is getting off topic but this sub topic is really interesting too. I'll mention bikes to keep it relevant by saying that it would be interesting if aliens had all their superior knowledge and technology but did so without ever going the route of the wheel. They may find our bikes to be the most interesting thing they have ever found in the universe!

Back to the subtopic at hand: finding them or them finding us may be futile. Someone once framed it by asking what if a blind cave fish ever wanted to find the mythical human and make contact. Generations ago another fish swears he heard human voices in the cave. They feel like they are making progress and they may make contact any day now. They wonder why we haven't made contact with them yet.

We, like the blind cave fish, may be waiting a long time for first contact.
It's starting to look like planets are extremely common in our galaxy. Since we've seen no evidence of other intelligent life, the Drake equation would seem to suggest that the average lifetime of technological civilizations is much shorter than we'd like it to be. They might either destroy themselves or run out of resources -- we've gone far enough down that path so we can see how that scenario might play out.
Platy is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 02:05 PM
  #20  
Bike addict, dreamer
 
AdamDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 5,165
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Platy
It's starting to look like planets are extremely common in our galaxy.
But since distances are measured in tens and hundreds of light years it's very hard to knock on the neighbor's door. We might eventually receive radio signals from a civilization only to find out that it's long gone since it took a few hundred years for the signal to reach us.

And seriously, we waste too much resources on wars to have any real chance to break away from our solar system. Until the planet unifies and ends wars the progress of individual nations will remain too slow to enable space exploration on a large scale.

I mean, NASA is back to rockets and parachutes from space shuttles. And until we burn chemicals we won't get anywhere anyway. Nations would have to put togehether all they have to have a shot at developing meaningful propulsion technology and spacecraft capable of carrying a large number of people and cargo across significant distances. And even that will require gazillion of other accompanying technologies to make the space travel possible: materials, life support systems, communication, navigation, energy storage and conservation, food processing and storage, health and emergency medicine, psychology, etc. None of these are at the level that will enable a large crew to travel across interplanetary space. Sending 4 people on a 4-year trip in a 10' wide can, hoping they won't freak out and eat one another, to bring back some rocks from Mars is not "space exploration".
AdamDZ is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 02:55 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Spur TX
Posts: 1,991

Bikes: Schwinn folder; SixThreeZero EvryJourney

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
I mean, NASA is back to rockets and parachutes from space shuttles.
Exactly so. It's not for lack of know-how or ideas. They could do better if they had the resources. But they don't.
Platy is offline  
Old 02-10-11, 03:14 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 64

Bikes: Jamis Coda, Trek 950 Single Track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting. And I have no argument for any of the above opinions. My point was that if they are far enough ahead of us in intelligence, then an attempt at contact (from either side) won't do any good. It would be like us trying to make contact with a cockroach.
musikguy is offline  
Old 02-23-11, 09:57 AM
  #23  
Pedaled too far.
Thread Starter
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
But since distances are measured in tens and hundreds of light years it's very hard to knock on the neighbor's door. We might eventually receive radio signals from a civilization only to find out that it's long gone since it took a few hundred years for the signal to reach us.

And seriously, we waste too much resources on wars to have any real chance to break away from our solar system. Until the planet unifies and ends wars the progress of individual nations will remain too slow to enable space exploration on a large scale.
Well it's yes and no about space exploration and warfare. The original impetus for the space programs was warfare. The German V2 was the granddaddy of both the American and Russian big rockets, and both space programs were cold-war programs. But it was Johnson who de-emphasized space, to help pay for the Vietnam war, allowing the Apollo program to wind down during Nixon's term.

Searching for life is a stupid reason to go into space. And I agree with Stephen Hawking, that we don't really want to go advertising ourselves because anyone who comes looking is likely to be more advanced than ourselves, but probably not so advanced that they have evolved beyond war. (Of course we have been broadcasting radio and TV for over a century and the cat is out of the bag) So as musikguy notes, it's wise for us cockroaches to avoid looking for trouble.

Though I think that by the time we do meet other intelligent life, we will be ready. Michael Alcubierre has already come up with an idea that should make faster than light travel possible. That's kind of like Da Vinci's drawings of a bicycle. On the right path, but still far from feasible. If we don't kill ourselves, an amazing future awaits.

It's demand for resources that will propel us into space. Right now the only ones we can tap are communication, looking at the Earth to understand it better, looking at the Sun to understand why it does what it does and giving Billionaires something new to spend their Billions on and play one upsmanship. All good causes.

The trick is to get the few people we send up, to have a substantial ROI, send goodies back to Earth and have babies so we don't have to send more people into space. Once people are in space, delivering goods back to Earth is easy.

I think that inhabiting the Moon will be the next phase of the space race. Again, China, India, Japan, Europe and hopefully the U.S. will be there. As Robert Heinlein demonstrated, militarily, the Moon is the most powerful place on Earth.

But I suspect the winner in this race will not be any particular country, but rather a current underdog; the corporations. They are already winning really. They own the communications satellites and the tourist buses. They are going after the low hanging fruit. It is much like the U.S. whaling industry which quickly went from rescuing carcasses on New England beaches to spanning the globe in the search for whale oil. I don't think we've found the "gold" yet that will spark the rush. But I have faith that we will.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.

Last edited by Artkansas; 02-23-11 at 10:11 AM.
Artkansas is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 06:28 AM
  #24  
Membership Not Required
 
wahoonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the road-USA
Posts: 16,855

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by musikguy
Interesting. And I have no argument for any of the above opinions. My point was that if they are far enough ahead of us in intelligence, then an attempt at contact (from either side) won't do any good. It would be like us trying to make contact with a cockroach.
I am sometimes convinced that the cockroaches are a higher form of life that most people give them credit for!

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Old 02-24-11, 08:09 AM
  #25  
Pedaled too far.
Thread Starter
 
Artkansas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Petite Roche
Posts: 12,851
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by wahoonc
I am sometimes convinced that the cockroaches are a higher form of life that most people give them credit for!
God must love them, as he's kept them around for so long.
__________________
"He who serves all, best serves himself" Jack London

Originally Posted by Bjforrestal
I don't care if you are on a unicycle, as long as you're not using a motor to get places you get props from me. We're here to support each other. Share ideas, and motivate one another to actually keep doing it.
Artkansas is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.